Literature DB >> 29720086

CLICK: one-step generation of conditional knockout mice.

Yoshiki Miyasaka1, Yoshihiro Uno1, Kazuto Yoshimi2,3, Yayoi Kunihiro1, Takuji Yoshimura1, Tomohiro Tanaka4, Harumi Ishikubo5, Yuichi Hiraoka5,6, Norihiko Takemoto7, Takao Tanaka8, Yoshihiro Ooguchi8, Paul Skehel9, Tomomi Aida5,6,10, Junji Takeda11, Tomoji Mashimo12,13.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: CRISPR/Cas9 enables the targeting of genes in zygotes; however, efficient approaches to create loxP-flanked (floxed) alleles remain elusive.
RESULTS: Here, we show that the electroporation of Cas9, two gRNAs, and long single-stranded DNA (lssDNA) into zygotes, termed CLICK (CRISPR with lssDNA inducing conditional knockout alleles), enables the quick generation of floxed alleles in mice and rats.
CONCLUSIONS: The high efficiency of CLICK provides homozygous knock-ins in oocytes carrying tissue-specific Cre, which allows the one-step generation of conditional knockouts in founder (F0) mice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CLICK; CRISPR/Cas9; Cre-loxP system; Long single-stranded DNA; Zygote electroporation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29720086      PMCID: PMC5930688          DOI: 10.1186/s12864-018-4713-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Genomics        ISSN: 1471-2164            Impact factor:   3.969


Background

The Cre/loxP system is one of the most valuable tools for genome engineering. In this system, Cre recombinase efficiently catalyzes recombination between two 34-bp consensus loxP sequences in any cellular environment, enabling the conditional transgenesis or knockout of genes in mice to study gene functions in specific tissues or at specific time points during development [1, 2]. Within ten years, the high-throughput generation of conditional alleles for virtually all mouse genes in embryonic stem (ES) cells has been achieved by the International Knockout Mouse Consortium [3, 4]. However, more than 10% of mouse ES genes have still not been modified because of targeting problems. Furthermore, the substitution of alternative exons or specific DNA fragments, such as promoters or enhancers, requires the generation of new targeting alleles. Recently, the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR associated (Cas) system has enabled the knockout of genes in zygotes via non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) with unprecedented simplicity and speed [5-7]. Regarding conditional alleles, targeted insertions of two loxP sites have been generated by genome editing tools with two loxP-containing single-stranded oligodeoxynucleotides (ssODNs) [8, 9] or with a single double-stranded DNA template, containing flanking homology arms (HA) via homology-directed repair (HDR) [6, 10]. However, the efficiency of these methods is not optimal in zygotes because of the lower rate of HDR compared with NHEJ. In addition, when only one of two loxP sites, or two loxP in trans are inserted at the targeted site, it is very difficult to obtain recombination between the two sites by further crossing. In this study, we have developed a one-step generation method for floxed mice using the CRISPR/Cas system with a long single-stranded DNA (lssDNA) composed of a targeted exon flanked by two loxP sites, which was constructed using a simple method using nicking endonucleases as we previously reported [11] (Additional file 1: Figure S1).

Results

Microinjection of CRISPR/Cas9 with lssDNA to generate a floxed allele

The proof of concept experiment started with the design of two gRNAs targeting introns on either side of exon 4 of the serine peptidase inhibitor clade A member 3 N (Serpina3n) gene, and lssDNA, which contains exon 4 flanked by two loxP sequences with a 60-bp 3′ HA and an extended 300-bp 5′ HA to avoid the effect of possible 5′ exonuclease activity, as previously described [11] (Fig. 1a and Additional file 2: Figure S2). To increase Cas9 endonuclease activity, we also used Cas9-polyA plasmids (RIKEN BRC: RDB13130), which appended an 81-bp polyadenine tail to the transcription terminator [11]. Microinjection (MI) of two gRNAs (25 ng/μl each), Cas9-polyA mRNA (50 ng/l), and lssDNA (25 ng/μl) into 371 fertilized eggs from C57BL/6 mice resulted in 56 live births delivered from foster ICR mice (Table 1). PCR analysis of their tail tips using external primers outside HA sequences (Additional file 2: Figure S2) showed multiple bands, which appeared as mosaicism (more than three bands) in pups (Fig. 1b). Direct sequencing analysis of the PCR products demonstrated various insertions or deletions (indels) as well as large deletions (LDs) or inversions between the two cutting sites (Fig. 1c and Additional file 3: Figure S3). We found 16 pups carried loxP sequences, of which nine had two loxP sites floxing exon 4 (Table 1 and Fig. 1c). Among the 9 floxed mice (F0), 5 carried either homozygous floxed alleles or were heterozygous floxed with LD alleles, indicated as ‘Conditional’ knockouts in Table 1.
Fig. 1

Mouse floxed alleles generated by microinjection of two gRNA, Cas9 mRNA and lssDNA into zygotes. a An approach to generate Serpina3n floxed alleles using the CRISPR/Cas system with long single-stranded DNA (lssDNA) composed of the targeted exon flanked by two loxP sites (Additional file 2: Figure S2). b PCR analysis of representative delivered mouse pups (#1–15) showing different types of mutations, indels, LD, and floxed alleles (black arrow) at the targeted Serpina3n locus. The primer sets (‘small’ in Additional file 2: Figure S2) were used for PCR and sequence analysis. Asterisks indicate pups used for testing germline transmission (Additional file 15: Table S1). M: 100 bp DNA ladder marker. c Representative examples of the targeted Serpina3n loci generated by the microinjection of two gRNA (gRNA-1 and gRNA-2), Cas9 mRNA and lssDNA into B6 mouse zygotes (Additional file 3: Figure S3)

Table 1

CRISPR/Cas-mediated insertion of loxP sequences at targeted sites in mice and rats

SpeciesStrainTarget genelssDNA size (bp)Transfer methodEmbryos injected (n)Embryos transferred (%)Live births (%)F0 animals
LD (%)loxP (%)flox (%)Conditional (%)
MouseC57B6 Serpina3n 708MI371255 (68.7)56 (22.0)28 (50.0)7 (12.5)9 (16.1)5 (8.9)
C57B6 Tyr 892MI222149 (67.1)17 (11.4)2 (11.8)4 (23.5)3 (17.6)
C57B6 mKIAA1322 1429MI166134 (80.7)5 (3.7)1 (20.0)4 (80.0)2 (40.0)
C57B6 Serpina3n 708EL180160 (88.9)18 (11.3)9 (50.0)2 (11.1)2 (11.1)2b (11.1)
C57B6 Mct4 1095EL134130 (97.0)21 (16.2)11 (52.4)3 (14.3)2 (9.5)1 (4.7)
RatF344 Vapb 674EL16077 (48.1)6 (7.8)2 (33.3)1 (16.6)3a (50.0)1 (16.6)
MouseEmx1-cre Serpina3n 708MI15074 (49.3)8 (10.8)4 (50.0)1 (12.5)1 (12.5)
Emx1-cre Serpina3n 708EL150113 (75.3)27 (23.9)10 (37.0)1 (3.7)5 (18.5)3c (11.1)

Transfer method: gRNA/Cas9 and long single-stranded DNA (lssDNA) transferred by microinjection (MI) or electroporation (EL). Embryos transferred: two-cell embryos were transferred into a surrogate mother. LD: large fragments deleted between two gRNA targeting sites. loxP and flox: positive for either one or two loxP sites, respectively

aAll three rats carried a missense mutation, P56S, together with floxed alleles. Conditional: conditional knockouts by homozygous floxed alleles or heterozygous floxed with LD alleles in F0 animals

bSite-specific recombination confirmed by crossing with Cre-driver mice

cSite-specific recombination confirmed in Cre-expressing tissues of F0 mice

- not identified

Mouse floxed alleles generated by microinjection of two gRNA, Cas9 mRNA and lssDNA into zygotes. a An approach to generate Serpina3n floxed alleles using the CRISPR/Cas system with long single-stranded DNA (lssDNA) composed of the targeted exon flanked by two loxP sites (Additional file 2: Figure S2). b PCR analysis of representative delivered mouse pups (#1–15) showing different types of mutations, indels, LD, and floxed alleles (black arrow) at the targeted Serpina3n locus. The primer sets (‘small’ in Additional file 2: Figure S2) were used for PCR and sequence analysis. Asterisks indicate pups used for testing germline transmission (Additional file 15: Table S1). M: 100 bp DNA ladder marker. c Representative examples of the targeted Serpina3n loci generated by the microinjection of two gRNA (gRNA-1 and gRNA-2), Cas9 mRNA and lssDNA into B6 mouse zygotes (Additional file 3: Figure S3) CRISPR/Cas-mediated insertion of loxP sequences at targeted sites in mice and rats Transfer method: gRNA/Cas9 and long single-stranded DNA (lssDNA) transferred by microinjection (MI) or electroporation (EL). Embryos transferred: two-cell embryos were transferred into a surrogate mother. LD: large fragments deleted between two gRNA targeting sites. loxP and flox: positive for either one or two loxP sites, respectively aAll three rats carried a missense mutation, P56S, together with floxed alleles. Conditional: conditional knockouts by homozygous floxed alleles or heterozygous floxed with LD alleles in F0 animals bSite-specific recombination confirmed by crossing with Cre-driver mice cSite-specific recombination confirmed in Cre-expressing tissues of F0 mice - not identified This method was repeated for exon 2 of the Tyrosinase (Tyr) gene and for exon 3 of the mKIAA1322 gene, which resulted in 3 mice carrying a floxed allele among 17 live births and 4 mice carrying a floxed allele among 5 live births, respectively (Table 1, Additional file 4: Figure S4, Additional file 5: Figure S5, Additional file 6: Figure S6, and Additional file 7: Figure S7). Crossing several F0 mice (#3, #22, #23 for floxed allele and #15, #20, #28 for single loxP-allele) with B6 mice confirmed the germline transmission of the floxed alleles into the next generation (Additional file 8: Figure 8). We observed no insertions or deletions at any off-target site for gRNAs targeting Serpina3n and Tyr genes across the whole genome in the F0 mice (Additional file 9: Figure 9).

Floxed alleles generated by zygote electroporation in mice and rats

We have previously reported the easy and efficient generation of knockout (KO) or knock-in (KI) mice using the CRISPR/Cas9 system with zygote electroporation (EL) instead of MI [12, 13]. For KI of floxed alleles, we used lssDNA with CRISPR/Cas9 for the transfer into embryos by electroporation. The zygote EL of two gRNAs (100 ng/μl each), Cas9 mRNA (400 ng/μl), and lssDNA (40 ng/μl) for Serpina3n or Monocarboxylate transporter 4 (Mct4) genes into 180 and 134 fertilized eggs resulted in 18 and 21 live births, respectively (Table 1). PCR and sequence analysis demonstrated carriers with various mutations, indels, LDs, and floxed alleles (Additional file 10: Figure S10, Additional file 11: Figure S11 and Additional file 12: Figure S12). The live birth rate, indel mutation rate, and loxP insertion efficiency were similar to those of MI, except for the higher survival rates of two-cell embryos (80–90%) by EL, as previously reported [12, 13] (Table 1). Moreover, crossing the floxed mice with Cre-driver mice (B6.Cg-Tg(CAG-Cre)CZ-MO2Osb: RBRC01828) provided site-specific recombination events between the two loxP sites, which confirmed that the floxed alleles were functional (Additional file 13: Figure S13). Therefore, we named this method CLICK: CRISPR with lssDNA inducing conditional knockout alleles (Fig. 2a).
Fig. 2

Rat floxed alleles generated by zygote electroporation. a Schematic representation of CLICK: CRISPR with lssDNA inducing conditional knockout alleles. b Schematic approach to generate rat Vapb floxed alleles using the CRISPR/Cas system with lssDNA composed of the targeted exon flanked by two loxP sites (Additional file 11: Figure S11). c PCR analysis of rat pups (#1–6) generated by CLICK, showing different types of mutations, indels, LD (via NHEJ), inversions, and floxed alleles (via HDR) (black arrow). The primer sets were used for PCR and sequence analysis (Additional file 2: Figure S2). M: 100 bp DNA ladder marker. d Sequence analysis of 6 pups showing a variety of mutations, indels, inversion or LD indicated by red letters, and loxP insertions and flox indicated by orange letters. All pups were used for testing germline transmission (Additional file 15: Table S1). Asterisks indicate pups used for testing the Cre-loxP system (Additional file 17: Table S3)

Rat floxed alleles generated by zygote electroporation. a Schematic representation of CLICK: CRISPR with lssDNA inducing conditional knockout alleles. b Schematic approach to generate rat Vapb floxed alleles using the CRISPR/Cas system with lssDNA composed of the targeted exon flanked by two loxP sites (Additional file 11: Figure S11). c PCR analysis of rat pups (#1–6) generated by CLICK, showing different types of mutations, indels, LD (via NHEJ), inversions, and floxed alleles (via HDR) (black arrow). The primer sets were used for PCR and sequence analysis (Additional file 2: Figure S2). M: 100 bp DNA ladder marker. d Sequence analysis of 6 pups showing a variety of mutations, indels, inversion or LD indicated by red letters, and loxP insertions and flox indicated by orange letters. All pups were used for testing germline transmission (Additional file 15: Table S1). Asterisks indicate pups used for testing the Cre-loxP system (Additional file 17: Table S3) To test whether CLICK can be applied to other species such as rats, we designed lssDNA including two loxP sequences floxing exon 2 of the rat vesicle-associated membrane protein-associated protein B/C (Vapb) gene with a P56S mutation, which is associated with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in humans [14] (Fig. 2b and Additional file 14: Figure S14). EL of the lssDNA and CRISPR components into rat zygotes resulted in the birth of six pups, which contained indels, LD, and inversion mutations between the cut sites (Table 1, Fig. 2c and d). Rats #1, #2, and #6 showed floxed alleles with the P56S mutation. Crossing these F0 rats with F344 rats or Cre-driver rats (W-Tg(CAG-cre)81Jmsk (NBRP-Rat No.0283)) provided the transmission of the floxed alleles or site-specific recombination that removed exon 2, respectively (Additional file 8: Figure S8 and Additional file 13: Figure S13).

One-step generation of conditional knockout animals in the founder generation

Finally, we applied the CLICK method to in vitro fertilized eggs of B6 mice with the sperm of Cre-driver mice (Emx1-cre: RBRC00808) expressing Cre in the cortical neurons and glia [15] (Fig. 3a). Among 8 and 27 live births by MI and EL, respectively, 6 mice carried floxed alleles for exon 2 of the Serpina3n gene (Table 1, Fig. 3b and Additional file 15: Table S1). Interestingly, 3 floxed mice, #14, #16, and #24, carried homozygous floxed alleles or heterozygous floxed with LD alleles in addition to the Emx1-Cre allele. PCR analysis of multiple tissues of #14 indicated a brain-specific recombination that removed exon 2 of the Serpina3n gene in this animal (Fig. 3c). These results indicate that CLICK can be used for the one-step generation of conditional knockout mice (F0) without further crossing, using fertilized eggs expressing tissue-specific Cre (Fig. 3d and Additional file 16: Table S2).
Fig. 3

One-step generation of conditional knockout animals (F0) by CLICK. a Schematic representation of applying CLICK in oocytes for in vitro fertilization (IVF) with Cre-driver mice, Emx1-cre, resulting in brain-specific recombination at the targeted floxed alleles. b PCR analysis of representative delivered mouse pups by microinjection (#1–8) or electroporation (#9–15) showing different types of mutations, indels, LD, and floxed alleles (black arrow) at the targeted Serpina3n locus. The primer sets (‘small’ in Additional file 2: Figure S2) were used for PCR and sequence analysis. c Genotyping in several tissues: cerebrum (Cr), cerebellum (Cl), heart (H), liver (L), spleen (S), and testis (Ts), indicating recombination (red arrow) by brain-specific Cre expression in #14 mouse carrying heterozygous floxed with LD alleles. M: 100 bp DNA ladder marker. d Time-schedule comparisons of targeting methods using ES cells by CRISPR in B6 oocytes, and CLICK in Cre oocytes. CLICK saves about 6 months of crossing and reduces breeding costs during the study period (Additional file 13: Figure S13)

One-step generation of conditional knockout animals (F0) by CLICK. a Schematic representation of applying CLICK in oocytes for in vitro fertilization (IVF) with Cre-driver mice, Emx1-cre, resulting in brain-specific recombination at the targeted floxed alleles. b PCR analysis of representative delivered mouse pups by microinjection (#1–8) or electroporation (#9–15) showing different types of mutations, indels, LD, and floxed alleles (black arrow) at the targeted Serpina3n locus. The primer sets (‘small’ in Additional file 2: Figure S2) were used for PCR and sequence analysis. c Genotyping in several tissues: cerebrum (Cr), cerebellum (Cl), heart (H), liver (L), spleen (S), and testis (Ts), indicating recombination (red arrow) by brain-specific Cre expression in #14 mouse carrying heterozygous floxed with LD alleles. M: 100 bp DNA ladder marker. d Time-schedule comparisons of targeting methods using ES cells by CRISPR in B6 oocytes, and CLICK in Cre oocytes. CLICK saves about 6 months of crossing and reduces breeding costs during the study period (Additional file 13: Figure S13)

Discussion

Compared with MI, CLICK with EL was less time-consuming, easier to prepare, and highly efficient at targeting the generation of floxed alleles in zygotes. lssDNA was easily prepared from custom-made plasmids within one day (Additional file 1: Figure S1). Zygote EL does not require expensive micromanipulator systems with special injection skills, allowing this approach to be used in numerous non-specialized laboratories (Fig. 2a). Frozen embryos or in vitro fertilized eggs are also available for zygote EL, facilitating the high throughput gene targeting of multiple genes with low costs (Fig. 3a). F0 mice generated by CLICK showed both homozygous floxed alleles and heterozygous or mosaic alleles, which in most cases were passed to the offspring (Additional file 15: Table S1). In principal, two gRNA and Cas9 transferred into zygotes provided double-strand breaks (DSBs) on each targeted site (Fig. 4). These DSBs were repaired by NHEJ, causing indel mutations at each site or a LD mutation. DSBs repaired by HDR using the lssDNA elicited a single loxP insertion or a floxed allele. Our data indicated a positive correlation between the observed number of large deletions and the occurrence of floxed alleles. To generate more LDs, three or four gRNAs may be used as previously reported [16, 17].
Fig. 4

Schematic representation of various mutations generated by CLICK. Two gRNAs and Cas9 formed double-strand breaks (DSB) on each targeted site or a large deletion between the two sites. DSBs repaired by NHEJ caused indel mutations or LD. DSBs elicited a single loxP insertion or floxed allele by HDR repair

Schematic representation of various mutations generated by CLICK. Two gRNAs and Cas9 formed double-strand breaks (DSB) on each targeted site or a large deletion between the two sites. DSBs repaired by NHEJ caused indel mutations or LD. DSBs elicited a single loxP insertion or floxed allele by HDR repair Although random integrations of single-stranded DNA are an infrequent event in contrast to those of double-stranded DNA, NHEJ-mediated mutations or DNA insertions at off-target sites may eventually occur. In the F0 founders we tested, no off-target insertion of the lssDNA donors was observed or determined by checking the heritability of the targeted floxed alleles in F1 mice. However, further backcrossing to wild-type animals might segregate such off-target integrations if detected. We previously reported lssDNA, formerly named lsODN, for CRISPR-mediated efficient KIs of GFP-coding sequences in rat zygotes [11]. CLICK with lssDNA including Cre-coding sequences in mouse zygotes also provided efficient KIs of Cre alleles at an endogenous targeted gene (T Mashimo, pers. comm.). Recently, Quadros et al. reported highly efficient KIs of Cre or floxed alleles (about 10–100%) using the microinjection of Cas9 protein with lssDNA into mouse embryos [18, 19]. However, Remy et al. reported no integration of a GFP reporter cassette with lssDNA by zygote electroporation, although the large DNA fragment was transferred into embryos [20]. The three different protocols used for the preparation of lssDNAs [11, 19, 20] might result in the different efficiency of KIs. According to our reports [11] and a previous report [19], lssDNA generally provides more efficient KIs of approximately 10–50% in zygotes compared with double stranded DNA that normally provides less than 10%. In addition, Cas9 protein rather than Cas9 mRNA provides more efficient KIs with short or long ssDNAs. The limitations of the current lssDNA approaches are the maximal length of the synthetic lssDNA is up to 3 kb, although this size is sufficient to generate floxed alleles for a single exon of most genes. The novel aspect of this study was the zygote electroporation of lssDNA from 600 to 1.5 kb to generate floxed alleles. In addition, CLICK in oocytes carrying tissue-specific Cre allowed the one-step generation of ‘conditional knockouts’ in F0 founder mice. In this study, F0 floxed mice showed brain-specific recombination that removed exon 2 of the Serpina3n gene (Fig. 3c). Immunostaining of brains with an anti-Serpina3n antibody showed the reduced expression of Serpina3n protein in F0 mice compared with wild-type mice (Additional file 17: Table S3). To the best of our knowledge, this one-step generation of conditional knockout mice has not been reported previously. This method could be used to generate conditional knockout mice routinely. However, the potential risk of mosaicism should be characterized in F0 mice. The conditional knockout phenotypes must be reconfirmed in the cohorts of the next F1 generation to distinguish tissue specific recombination or the extent of mosaicism. If the germline of F0 mice is not recombined by Cre expression, conditional knockout phenotypes could be easily reconfirmed in the next generation.

Conclusions

In summary, the use of CLICK in the zygote electroporation of two gRNAs, Cas9 and lssDNA, provides the easy and quick generation of floxed alleles in zygotes (Fig. 3d). Furthermore, CLICK in fertilized oocytes expressing tissue-specific Cre enables the one-step generation of conditional knockout mice, skipping two generations for subsequent crossing, which facilitates high-throughput gene targeting in mice and rats.

Methods

Animals

C57BL/6JJcl mice and F344/Jcl rats were obtained from CLEA Japan Inc., Tokyo, Japan. B6.Cg-Tg(CAG-Cre)CZ-MO2Osb (RBRC01828) and Emx1-cre (RBRC00808) mice were provided by RIKEN BRC (www.en.brc.riken.jp), and W-Tg(CAG-cre)81Jmsk (NBRP-Rat No.0283) rats were from the National Bio Resource Project for the Rat in Japan (www.anim.med.kyoto-u.ac.jp/nbr). The animals were kept under conditions of 50% humidity and a 12:12 h light:dark cycle. They were fed a standard pellet diet (MF, Oriental Yeast Co., Tokyo, Japan) and tap water ad libitum.

Preparation of Cas9, gRNA and lssDNAs

We formally constructed pCas9-polyA and deposited it into the Addgene repository (ID #72602; www.addgene.org/CRISPR). mRNA was transcribed in vitro using a mMESSAGE mMACHINE T7 Ultra Kit (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) from linearized plasmids and was purified using a MEGAClear kit (Life Technologies). To design gRNAs, software tools (www.crispr.genome-engineering.org) predicting unique target sites throughout the mouse and rat genome were used. gRNAs were transcribed in vitro using a MEGAshortscript T7 Transcription Kit (Life Technologies) from synthetic double-strand DNAs obtained from IDT (Integrated DNA Technologies, IA, USA) or Life Technologies. lssDNAs were prepared by a simple method using nicking endonucleases as we previously reported [11] (Additional file 1: Figure S1). Briefly, double-stranded DNA plasmids comprising of a floxed allele, homology arms, and two nicking endonuclease sites were obtained from Thermo Fisher Scientific (MA, USA) as GeneArt® Gene Synthesis. For digestion, 100 μg of the purified plasmid DNA was incubated at an optimum temperature for 2 to 3 h with nicking endonucleases, such as Nt.BspQI and Nb.BbvCI (New England Biolabs Inc., MA, USA). After purification by ethanol precipitation, the DNAs were denatured with 3-fold amounts of formamide (Nacalai Tesque, Inc., Tokyo, Japan) at 80 °C for 10 min, and then subjected to agarose gel electrophoresis with DynaMarker®Prestain Marker for RNA High concentrations (Biodynamics Laboratory Inc., Tokyo, Japan). Bands corresponding to a single-strand DNA fragment were extracted using NucleoSpin® Gel and PCR Clean-up (Takara Bio, Shiga, Japan). Finally, 2–4 μg of lssDNA was obtained with this method.

Microinjection and electroporation into mouse and rat embryos

Pronuclear-stage mouse embryos were prepared by thawing frozen embryos (CLEA Japan Inc.), or in vitro fertilized embryos, or fresh embryos collected from naturally mated female mice that were superovulated by injection with pregnant mare serum gonadotropin (PMSG: ASKA Animal Health Co., Tokyo, Japan) and human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG: ASKA Animal Health Co.). Rat embryos were collected from 8 to 12 weeks of age females that were superovulated by the administration of 150 U/kg of PMSG followed by 75 U/kg of HCG. After natural mating, pronuclear-stage embryos were collected from the oviducts of the females and cultured in a modified Krebs–Ringer bicarbonate medium or KSOM medium (ARK Resource, Kumamoto, Japan). In MI, 50 ng/μl Cas9 mRNA, 25 ng/μl gRNA, or 50 ng/μl lssDNA were microinjected into the male pronuclei of embryos using a micromanipulator (Narishige, Tokyo, Japan). In targeting mouse KIAA1322, 30 ng/μl Cas9 protein (PNA Bio, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA) was used instead of Cas9 mRNA [21]. This was cultured in modified Krebs–Ringer bicarbonate or KSOM medium overnight and divided two-cell embryos were transferred into pseudopregnant females. For EL, 50–100 embryos at 1 h after thawing or 3–4 h after collection were placed into a chamber with 40 μl of serum free media (Opti-MEM, Thermo Fisher Scientific) containing 400 ng/μl Cas9 mRNA, 200 ng/μl gRNA, or 40 ng/μl lssDNA. They were electroporated with a 5 mm gap electrode (CUY505P5 or CUY520P5 Nepa Gene, Chiba, Japan) in a NEPA21 Super Electroporator (Nepa Gene, Chiba, Japan).The poring pulses for the electroporation were voltage 225 V, pulse width 1.5 ms for mouse embryos and 2.0 ms for rat embryos, pulse interval 50 ms, and number of pulses 4. The first and second transfer pulses were voltage 20 V, pulse width 50 ms, pulse interval 50 ms, and number of pulses 5. Mouse or rat embryos that developed to the two-cell stage after the introduction of RNA and lssDNA were transferred into the oviducts of female surrogates anesthetized with isoflurane (DS Pharma Animal Health Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan).

Genotyping analysis

Genomic DNA was extracted from the tail tip using the KAPA Express Extract DNA Extraction Kit (Kapa Biosystems, London, UK). For PCR and sequence analysis, we used external primers outside the HA, which amplied the targeted region (Additional file 18: Table S4). PCR was performed in a total volume of 15 μl under the following conditions: 1 cycle of 94 °C for 3 min; 35 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 60 °C for 1 min and 72 °C for 45 s; and 1 cycle of 72 °C for 3 min. The final reaction mixture contained 200 μM dNTPs, 1.0 mM MgCl2, and 0.66 μM of primer. The PCR products were then directly sequenced using the BigDye Terminator v3.1 cycle sequencing mix and the standard protocol for an Applied Biosystems 3130 DNA Sequencer (Life Technologies). To confirm mosaic mutations, we sequenced individual TA clones in some cases. Figure S1. Schematic representation of the protocol to prepare long single-stranded DNA (lssDNA) using nicking endonucleases. (AI 1147 kb) Figure S2. Sequences of two gRNAs and a complementary lssDNA(−) designed to target exon 4 of the mouse Serpina3n locus. (AI 1215 kb) Figure S3. Floxed Serpina3n alleles generated by the microinjection of two gRNA, Cas9 mRNA and lssDNA(−) into B6 mouse zygotes. (AI 1263 kb) Figure S4. Sequences of two gRNAs and lssDNA(−) designed to target exon 2 of the mouse Tyr locus. (AI 1210 kb) Figure S5. Floxed Tyr alleles generated by the microinjection of two gRNA, Cas9 mRNA and lssDNA(−) into B6 mouse zygotes. (AI 1656 kb) Figure S6. Sequences of two gRNAs and lssDNA(−) designed to target exon 3 of the mouse KIAA1322 locus. (AI 1214 kb) Figure S7. Floxed KIAA1322 alleles generated by the microinjection of two gRNA, Cas9 mRNA and lssDNA(−) into B6 mouse zygotes. (AI 2040 kb) Figure S8. Floxed Serpina3n alleles generated by the electroporation of two gRNA, Cas9 mRNA and lssDNA(−) into B6 mouse zygotes. (AI 1569 kb) Figure S9. Sequences of two gRNAs and lssDNA(+) designed to target exon 3 of the mouse Mct4 locus. (AI 1209 kb) Figure S10. Floxed Mct4 alleles generated by the electroporation of two gRNA, Cas9 mRNA and lssDNA(+) into B6 mouse zygotes. (AI 1651 kb) Figure S11. Sequences of two gRNAs and lssDNA(+) designed to target exon 2 of the rat Vapb locus. (AI 1013 kb) Figure S12. Floxed Serpina3n alleles generated by CLICK in oocytes in vitro fertilized with the sperm of Emx1-Cre driver mice. (AI 1260 kb) Figure S13. Schematic representation of the one-step generation of conditional knockout animals (F0) by CLICK. (AI 1315 kb) Figure S14. Expression levels of SERPINA3N protein in the brains of wild-type (WT) and F0 founder mice (#14). (AI 1698 kb) Table S1. Germline transmission of CLICK-mediated mutations in F1 offspring. (XLSX 12 kb) Table S2. Potential off-target sites for CRISPR/Cas targeting on the mouse genome. (XLSX 14 kb) Table S3. Crossing floxed founders with Cre-driver mice. (XLSX 11 kb) Table S4. Primer sets used for PCR and sequencing analysis in this study. (XLSX 10 kb)
  21 in total

Review 1.  Conditional genome alteration in mice.

Authors:  C G Lobe; A Nagy
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.345

2.  Whole-rat conditional gene knockout via genome editing.

Authors:  Andrew J Brown; Daniel A Fisher; Evguenia Kouranova; Aaron McCoy; Kevin Forbes; Yumei Wu; Rachel Henry; Diana Ji; Andre Chambers; Joe Warren; Weiguo Shu; Edward J Weinstein; Xiaoxia Cui
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2013-06-09       Impact factor: 28.547

3.  One-step generation of mice carrying mutations in multiple genes by CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome engineering.

Authors:  Haoyi Wang; Hui Yang; Chikdu S Shivalila; Meelad M Dawlaty; Albert W Cheng; Feng Zhang; Rudolf Jaenisch
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Dorsal telencephalon-specific expression of Cre recombinase in PAC transgenic mice.

Authors:  Takuji Iwasato; Ryochi Nomura; Reiko Ando; Toshio Ikeda; Mika Tanaka; Shigeyoshi Itohara
Journal:  Genesis       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.487

5.  Efficient CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing in Mice by Zygote Electroporation of Nuclease.

Authors:  Wenning Qin; Stephanie L Dion; Peter M Kutny; Yingfan Zhang; Albert W Cheng; Nathaniel L Jillette; Ankit Malhotra; Aron M Geurts; Yi-Guang Chen; Haoyi Wang
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Megabase-scale deletion using CRISPR/Cas9 to generate a fully haploid human cell line.

Authors:  Patrick Essletzbichler; Tomasz Konopka; Federica Santoro; Doris Chen; Bianca V Gapp; Robert Kralovics; Thijn R Brummelkamp; Sebastian M B Nijman; Tilmann Bürckstümmer
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Simple knockout by electroporation of engineered endonucleases into intact rat embryos.

Authors:  Takehito Kaneko; Tetsushi Sakuma; Takashi Yamamoto; Tomoji Mashimo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Insertion of loxP Sites in the Mouse Dock7 Gene Provides an Effective Alternative to Use of Targeted Embryonic Stem Cells.

Authors:  Kathleen A Bishop; Anne Harrington; Evguenia Kouranova; Edward J Weinstein; Clifford J Rosen; Xiaoxia Cui; Lucy Liaw
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 3.154

9.  ssODN-mediated knock-in with CRISPR-Cas for large genomic regions in zygotes.

Authors:  Kazuto Yoshimi; Yayoi Kunihiro; Takehito Kaneko; Hitoshi Nagahora; Birger Voigt; Tomoji Mashimo
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Easi-CRISPR: a robust method for one-step generation of mice carrying conditional and insertion alleles using long ssDNA donors and CRISPR ribonucleoproteins.

Authors:  Rolen M Quadros; Hiromi Miura; Donald W Harms; Hisako Akatsuka; Takehito Sato; Tomomi Aida; Ronald Redder; Guy P Richardson; Yutaka Inagaki; Daisuke Sakai; Shannon M Buckley; Parthasarathy Seshacharyulu; Surinder K Batra; Mark A Behlke; Sarah A Zeiner; Ashley M Jacobi; Yayoi Izu; Wallace B Thoreson; Lisa D Urness; Suzanne L Mansour; Masato Ohtsuka; Channabasavaiah B Gurumurthy
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  29 in total

1.  CRISPR-READI: Efficient Generation of Knockin Mice by CRISPR RNP Electroporation and AAV Donor Infection.

Authors:  Sean Chen; Sabrina Sun; Dewi Moonen; Clancy Lee; Angus Yiu-Fai Lee; David V Schaffer; Lin He
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 9.423

2.  Slow oscillations persist in pancreatic beta cells lacking phosphofructokinase M.

Authors:  Isabella Marinelli; Vishal Parekh; Patrick Fletcher; Benjamin Thompson; Jinhua Ren; Xiaoqing Tang; Thomas L Saunders; Joon Ha; Arthur Sherman; Richard Bertram; Leslie S Satin
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2022-02-05       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  An Optimized Preparation Method for Long ssDNA Donors to Facilitate Quick Knock-In Mouse Generation.

Authors:  Yukiko U Inoue; Yuki Morimoto; Mayumi Yamada; Ryosuke Kaneko; Kazumi Shimaoka; Shinji Oki; Mayuko Hotta; Junko Asami; Eriko Koike; Kei Hori; Mikio Hoshino; Itaru Imayoshi; Takayoshi Inoue
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 6.600

4.  Calcium-Free and Cytochalasin B Treatment Inhibits Blastomere Fusion in 2-Cell Stage Embryos for the Generation of Floxed Mice via Sequential Electroporation.

Authors:  Takuro Horii; Ryosuke Kobayashi; Mika Kimura; Sumiyo Morita; Izuho Hatada
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 5.  Orthotopic T-Cell Receptor Replacement-An "Enabler" for TCR-Based Therapies.

Authors:  Kilian Schober; Thomas R Müller; Dirk H Busch
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 6.  How to create state-of-the-art genetic model systems: strategies for optimal CRISPR-mediated genome editing.

Authors:  Yannik Bollen; Jasmin Post; Bon-Kyoung Koo; Hugo J G Snippert
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 7.  Principles of Genetic Engineering.

Authors:  Thomas M Lanigan; Huira C Kopera; Thomas L Saunders
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 4.096

Review 8.  Homology-based repair induced by CRISPR-Cas nucleases in mammalian embryo genome editing.

Authors:  Xiya Zhang; Tao Li; Jianping Ou; Junjiu Huang; Puping Liang
Journal:  Protein Cell       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 14.870

9.  Intra-embryo Gene Cassette Knockin by CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing with Adeno-Associated Viral Vector.

Authors:  Naoaki Mizuno; Eiji Mizutani; Hideyuki Sato; Mariko Kasai; Aki Ogawa; Fabian Suchy; Tomoyuki Yamaguchi; Hiromitsu Nakauchi
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2018-11-02

10.  Reproducibility of CRISPR-Cas9 methods for generation of conditional mouse alleles: a multi-center evaluation.

Authors:  Channabasavaiah B Gurumurthy; Aidan R O'Brien; Rolen M Quadros; John Adams; Pilar Alcaide; Shinya Ayabe; Johnathan Ballard; Surinder K Batra; Marie-Claude Beauchamp; Kathleen A Becker; Guillaume Bernas; David Brough; Francisco Carrillo-Salinas; Wesley Chan; Hanying Chen; Ruby Dawson; Victoria DeMambro; Jinke D'Hont; Katharine M Dibb; James D Eudy; Lin Gan; Jing Gao; Amy Gonzales; Anyonya R Guntur; Huiping Guo; Donald W Harms; Anne Harrington; Kathryn E Hentges; Neil Humphreys; Shiho Imai; Hideshi Ishii; Mizuho Iwama; Eric Jonasch; Michelle Karolak; Bernard Keavney; Nay-Chi Khin; Masamitsu Konno; Yuko Kotani; Yayoi Kunihiro; Imayavaramban Lakshmanan; Catherine Larochelle; Catherine B Lawrence; Lin Li; Volkhard Lindner; Xian-De Liu; Gloria Lopez-Castejon; Andrew Loudon; Jenna Lowe; Loydie A Jerome-Majewska; Taiji Matsusaka; Hiromi Miura; Yoshiki Miyasaka; Benjamin Morpurgo; Katherine Motyl; Yo-Ichi Nabeshima; Koji Nakade; Toshiaki Nakashiba; Kenichi Nakashima; Yuichi Obata; Sanae Ogiwara; Mariette Ouellet; Leif Oxburgh; Sandra Piltz; Ilka Pinz; Moorthy P Ponnusamy; David Ray; Ronald J Redder; Clifford J Rosen; Nikki Ross; Mark T Ruhe; Larisa Ryzhova; Ane M Salvador; Sabrina Shameen Alam; Radislav Sedlacek; Karan Sharma; Chad Smith; Katrien Staes; Lora Starrs; Fumihiro Sugiyama; Satoru Takahashi; Tomohiro Tanaka; Andrew W Trafford; Yoshihiro Uno; Leen Vanhoutte; Frederique Vanrockeghem; Brandon J Willis; Christian S Wright; Yuko Yamauchi; Xin Yi; Kazuto Yoshimi; Xuesong Zhang; Yu Zhang; Masato Ohtsuka; Satyabrata Das; Daniel J Garry; Tino Hochepied; Paul Thomas; Jan Parker-Thornburg; Antony D Adamson; Atsushi Yoshiki; Jean-Francois Schmouth; Andrei Golovko; William R Thompson; K C Kent Lloyd; Joshua A Wood; Mitra Cowan; Tomoji Mashimo; Seiya Mizuno; Hao Zhu; Petr Kasparek; Lucy Liaw; Joseph M Miano; Gaetan Burgio
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 13.583

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.