| Literature DB >> 29719530 |
Eleonora Mastrorilli1, Daniele Pietrucci2, Lisa Barco1, Serena Ammendola2, Sara Petrin1, Alessandra Longo1, Claudio Mantovani3, Andrea Battistoni2, Antonia Ricci1, Alessandro Desideri2, Carmen Losasso1.
Abstract
Over the past decades, Salmonella 4,[5],12:i:- has rapidly emerged and it is isolated with high frequency in the swine food chain. Although many studies have documented the epidemiological success of this serovar, few investigations have tried to explain this phenomenon from a genetic perspective. Here a comparative whole-genome analysis of 50 epidemiologically unrelated S. 4,[5],12:i:-, isolated in Italy from 2010 to 2016 was performed, characterizing them in terms of genetic elements potentially conferring resistance, tolerance and persistence characteristics. Phylogenetic analyses indicated interesting distinctions among the investigated isolates. The most striking genetic trait characterizing the analyzed isolates is the widespread presence of heavy metals tolerance gene cassettes: most of the strains possess genes expected to confer resistance to copper and silver, whereas about half of the isolates also contain the mercury tolerance gene merA. A functional assay showed that these genes might be useful for preventing the toxic effects of metals, thus supporting the hypothesis that they can contribute to the success of S. 4,[5],12:i:- in farming environments. In addition, the analysis of the distribution of type II toxin-antitoxin families indicated that these elements are abundant in this serovar, suggesting that this is another factor that might favor its successful spread.Entities:
Keywords: Salmonella; antimicrobial resistance; swine foodchain; tolerance to heavy metals; toxin-antitoxin
Year: 2018 PMID: 29719530 PMCID: PMC5913373 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00715
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Figure 1Summary infographic of strains. From outer to inner circle: strain name and source of origin; year of isolation (before/after 2011); HMT profile, color coded; TA profile, color coded; AMR profile, color coded (splitted into two circles for readability); replicon profile, color coded (splitted into five circles for readability); phylogenetic tree derived from core genome analysis. Strain clustering is highlighted (red: cluster 1; light-blue: cluster 2; green: cluster 3). Atypical MVST are highlighted with green circles. All 50 the analyzed strains and the two reference genomes (LN999997 and LT2) are included.
Sample description.
| CATTLE | PIG | POULTRY | NA | HUMAN | HERON | |
| 5 (3) | 37 (3) | 5 (1) | 1 (1) | 1 (1) | 1 (1) | |
| 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2015 | |||
| 2 | 20 (8) | 3 (2) | 25 | |||
| ST-19 | ST-34 | ST-99 | ||||
| 2 (2) | 46 (6) | 2 (2) | ||||
Samples description in term of source, year of isolation and in-silico MLST. Numbers in brackets refer to the number of atypical MVST in the group.
Sample description by genotype.
| – | 5 (4) |
| 3 (2) | |
| 23 (4) | |
| 20 (0) | |
| 1 (0) | |
| 28 (4) | |
| 6 (1) | |
| – | 5 (2) |
| 2 (0) | |
| 1 (0) | |
| 1 (0) | |
| 1 (1) | |
| 1 (1) | |
| 1 (1) | |
| 1 (0) | |
| 1 (0) | |
| 1 (0) | |
| 1 (0) | |
| 1 (0) | |
| 1 (0) | |
| Col(BS512),Col(VCM04),IncQ1,ColpVC,ColRNAI | 1 (0) |
| Col(VCM04),ColRNAI | 1 (0) |
| Col(VCM04),IncQ1,ColRNAI | 1 (0) |
| Col(VCM04),IncQ1,ColRNAI,IncFIB(AP001918),IncFIC(FII),IncHI2A,IncHI2 | 1 (0) |
| ColpVC | 1 (0) |
| ColpVC,ColRNAI,Col156 | 1 (0) |
| ColRNAI | 1 (0) |
| ColRNAI,Col156,ColE10,IncFIC(FII),IncI1,IncFIB(pB171) | 1 (1) |
| IncFIA,IncFIB(AP001918) | 1 (1) |
| IncFIB(S),IncFII(S) | 1 (0) |
| IncFIB(S),IncFII(S),IncFII | 1 (1) |
| IncFIB(S),IncFII(S),IncX4,IncFII | 1 (1) |
| IncQ1 | 8 (1) |
| IncQ1,ColRNAI | 13 (2) |
| IncQ1,ColRNAI,Col156 | 6 (0) |
| IncQ1,ColRNAI,Col156,Col8282 | 1 (0) |
| IncQ1,ColRNAI,Col156,IncI1 | 1 (0) |
| IncQ1,ColRNAI,ColE10 | 1 (0) |
| IncQ1,ColRNAI,IncFIB(S),IncFII(S),IncFII | 1 (1) |
| IncQ1,ColRNAI,IncFII | 1 (0) |
| IncQ1,ColRNAI,IncI1 | 1 (1) |
| IncQ1,IncI1 | 2 (0) |
| IncQ1,IncN | 1 (1) |
| IncQ1,IncX1 | 1 (0) |
| p0111 | 1 (0) |
| – | 2 (0) |
| 46 (6) | |
| 2 (1) | |
| 3 (3) | |
| 1 (0) | |
Heavy metal tolerance (HMT) profile, replicon profile, antimicrobial resistance (AMR) profile, toxin-antitoxin (TA) profile and the corresponding number of strains in which they were found. Numbers in brackets refer to the number of atypical monophasic variants in the group. All 50 the analyzed strains and the two reference genomes (LN999997 and LT2) are included.
Figure 2Location of pcoA, pcoD, silA, and silE in the identified genomic region. SilP and cusS are also represented in gray, since they were searched after functional annotation highlighted them as conserved in all samples carrying the pcoA-pcoD-silA-silE HMTG profile.
Frequency of the heavy metal tolerance profile by year of strain isolation.
| none or | 7 | 1 |
| 12 | 11 | |
| 4 | 17 | |
“+1” indicates the presence of another HMTG (merA or terF). All 50 the analyzed strains and the two reference genomes (LN999997 and LT2) are included.
Figure 3Phylogenetic tree obtained from SNP based phylogeny when LN999997 is used as reference strain; LT2 set as root; green circles highlight atypical MVST. Red: cluster 1; light-blue: cluster 2; green: cluster 3.
Figure 4Phylogenetic tree obtained from core genome alignment phylogeny; LT2 set as root; green circles highlight atypical MVST. Red: cluster 1; light-blue: cluster 2; green: cluster 3.
Figure 5Hierarchical clustering with Manhattan distance and UPGMA over accessory genome presence/absence gene profile. All 50 the analyzed strains and the two reference genomes (LN999997 and LT2) are included.
Figure 6(A) Group representation on the first two dimensions for MFA on the whole dataset. (B) Individuals plot on the first two dimensions for MFA on the whole dataset. Color scales according to sample clustering in the phylogenetic analysis. (C) Group representation on the first two dimensions for MFA on the reduced dataset, after outliers removal. (D) Individuals plot on the first two dimensions for MFA on the reduced dataset, after outliers removal. Color scales according to sample clustering in the phylogenetic analysis. All 50 the analyzed strains and the two reference genomes (LN999997 and LT2) are included.
Figure 7(A) Swimming motility in CuSO4 supplemented plates of Salmonella strains carrying the copper resistance cluster (blue bars) or not (red bars). Each percentage was calculated taking as 100% of motility the halo diameters in plates without CuSO4 supplementation. Statistical difference in motility between the two groups of samples was assessed by the Mann-Withney U test. (B) representative picture showing differences in swimming motility between strains carrying (ISZ-17) or lacking (DTU2016-1040) the copper resistance cluster. At high copper concentration (4 mM) motility is inhibited in both strains. The effect of copper on the motility of the biphasic strain ATCC 14018, which lacks the metal resistance gene cluster, in included for comparison.