Polydisperse smooth and spherical biocolloidal particles were suspended in aqueous media and allowed to consolidate via evaporation-induced self-assembly. The stratification of the particles at the solid-air interface was markedly influenced, but not monotonically, by the drying rate. Cross-sectional imaging via electron microscopy indicated a structured coating morphology that was distinctive from that obtained by using particles with a mono- or bimodal distribution. Segregation patterns were found to derive from the interplay of particle diffusion, interparticle forces, and settling dynamics. Supporting our experimental findings, computer simulations showed an optimal drying rate for achieving maximum segregation. Overall, stratified coatings comprising nano- and microparticles derived from lignin are expected to open opportunities for multifunctional structures that can be designed and predicted on the basis of experimental Péclet numbers and computational order.
Polydisperse smooth and spherical biocolloidal particles were suspended in aqueous media and allowed to consolidate via evaporation-induced self-assembly. The stratification of the particles at the solid-air interface was markedly influenced, but not monotonically, by the drying rate. Cross-sectional imaging via electron microscopy indicated a structured coating morphology that was distinctive from that obtained by using particles with a mono- or bimodal distribution. Segregation patterns were found to derive from the interplay of particle diffusion, interparticle forces, and settling dynamics. Supporting our experimental findings, computer simulations showed an optimal drying rate for achieving maximum segregation. Overall, stratified coatings comprising nano- and microparticles derived from lignin are expected to open opportunities for multifunctional structures that can be designed and predicted on the basis of experimental Péclet numbers and computational order.
The structure of dried, consolidated film
containing particles
depends on several parameters such as those inherent to the particles
(morphology, electrostatic charge, concentration, and glass transition
temperature, Tg), the medium (rheology
of the continuous system), and the drying conditions. Particle stratification
can be useful in multifunctional coatings whose surface properties
may differ from those of the layers located underneath, neighboring
the solid support. Film formation effects are of paramount importance
in applications such as layered coatings for adhesives, inks, paints,
cosmetics, flexible electronics, and advanced materials. However,
gaining control on the detailed structure of the dried films is the
only way to facilitate the development of property spaces, for example,
to adjust porosity and tortuosity, roughness and friction, plasmonic
and optical performance, and permeability as well as conductivity
(fluid, sound, or thermal).The fundamentals of latex film formation
have been thoroughly addressed
by Keddie and Routh,[1] who identified the
main steps involved in the transformation of a dispersion into a continuous
film. In brief, such process starts from a stable dispersion that
consolidates under drying into a structure of given packing, depending
on the deformation, interdiffusion, and coalescence. The deformation
of the particles is driven by a combination of capillary, osmotic,
and surface forces that may overcome the elastic modulus of the polymeric
particles.[2] For hard particles that are
not subjected to deformation, the resulting films are expected to
crack if the temperature at which they form is below the particle’s Tg.The drying mechanisms of colloidal
dispersions have been discussed
in recent reports.[1,3−7] Typically, particulate films tend to dry nonhomogeneously,
leading to horizontal and vertical drying profiles, which are often
investigated independent of each other. Experimentally, it has been
observed that upon drying, the in-plane (horizontal) front may cause
movement and flow of the particles in the same direction. However,
their movement can be neglected in films formed with large lateral
dimensions.[8] Significant to our work is
the observation that in such cases, out-of-plane or vertical stratification
determines the microstructure of the resulting film.The vertical
distribution of particles involves a balance of the
time scales for evaporation, diffusion, and sedimentation. The sedimentation
can be neglected if the size of the particles is in the colloidal
range. In this case, evaporation and Brownian diffusion become the
two main competing processes. As the surface of the drying film recedes,
the Brownian diffusion tends to distribute the particles evenly in
the film, along the height, whereas the descending fluid front, i.e.,
via evaporation, places the system out of equilibrium. The time scales
for diffusion and evaporation are H2/Do and H/Ė, respectively, where H is the film height (m), Do is the diffusion coefficient (m2/s), and Ė is the evaporation rate (m/s),
related to the receding rate of the fluid front. The two time scales
can be grouped in the dimensionless Péclet number (Pe)where η is the viscosity of the solvent, R is the particle radius, k is the Boltzman’s
constant, and T is the temperature.[6] For Pe ≫ 1, particle diffusion
is weak compared to evaporation, and a nonuniform particle distribution
is expected, tending to form a close-packed structure on top of the
film. For Pe ≪ 1, diffusion is faster than
evaporation, and the particles tend to remain uniformly dispersed;
thus, a homogeneous film will be formed.Various experimental
methods have been used to tune particle stratification,
for example, by adjusting the values of the variables in the Péclet
number, most simply, by changing the particle size and the drying
rate. Trueman et al.[8] used bimodal dispersions
of latex particles to study the stratification and the structure of
the formed films. Stratification of colloidal blends of large and
small latex particles leading to Pe ≫ 1 were
studied by Fortini et al.[4] The experiments
were combined with computational modeling to identify a gradient of
osmotic pressure as the driving force that caused stratification.
In other reports, stratified coatings were developed using pH-responsive
polymethacrylic acid-modified colloids, which could be switched to
homogeneous structures upon pH change.[9] Besides experimental analyses, particulate stratification has also
been thoroughly studied using mathematical modeling and simulation
of evaporation-, diffusion-, and sedimentation-driven systems.[5,7,10−13] The evaporation-induced self-assembly
(EISA) of hybrid systems containing mixtures of organic/inorganic
particles is a field of interest in the scientific community. In the
work by Luo et al.,[14] some few processing
variables were relevant to the formation of coatings comprising bimodal
silica/latex dispersions. Cryo-scanning electron microscopy (SEM)
images of the cross sections of drying films revealed the formation
sequence in the coating microstructure. Finally, radiation-assisted
evaporation of blends of gold and polymer nanoparticles was used to
obtain two-dimensional nanogrids with photonic and plasmonic effects.[15]Lateral effects that emerge upon drying
can also be relevant in
the arrangement of particles. For example, uneven drying conditions,
along a given area in a coating layer, may generate a lateral flow
that is effective in assembling nanoparticles into directed architectures.
Such effects can be attained by using a heat-generating element (for
example, an infrared lamp) and a mask, known as infrared-assisted
evaporative lithography. This method has been used by several authors
do develop topographically patterned coatings.[16,17]The study of the out-of-plane or vertical particle distribution
in the films, especially when using soft latex particles, requires
“freezing” the structure at the desired stages of drying.
This enables the imaging of particle distribution before film deformation
and consolidation. Atomic force microscopy is commonly used to access
the final, dried films. However, this technique only provides surface
information and, in the case of films consolidated from latex, the
particles may not be visible. Thus, GARField NMR is an attractive
option because it provides indirect information on the film structure
by quantification of the unbound water remaining throughout the height
of the film.[18] This technique allows identifying
“skin” effects in the drying film, but it cannot provide
the morphological information, such as particle size distribution
and film porosity.Although bimodal and trimodal particle systems
have been used in
some of the few efforts cited previously, the case of polydisperse
systems has remained unexplored. This is surprising because most of
the industrial powders and particles in common use, for example, inks,
paints, and coatings, are inherently polydisperse, i.e., exhibit a
broad distribution of sizes. Therefore, it is essential to investigate,
by means of experimental, computational, and analytical methods, the
stratification involved in such polydisperse systems. Of further interest
is the fact that work reported during the last several decades has
considered stratification effects only for latexes, acrylic copolymers,
metal (gold and silica), and other inorganic materials. However, self-assembly
and stratification of particles comprising biopolymers have been neglected
even though they provide enticing possibilities in the production
processes and in products, especially if they are renewable and biodegradable.
In this regard, lignin particles (LPs), which have emerged recently
as interesting biocolloids, can bring truly unique opportunities.
Indeed, lignin is present in plant cell walls as a complex, amorphous
polymer of phenylpropane units linked by a large number of bond types.
Lignin has several functions in plants, including structural functions.
Over the years, the traditional industrial processes that convert
lignocellulosic materials into goods have treated lignin as a byproduct
for energy recovery. However, the advent of biorefineries for cellulosic
biomass conversion into value-added streams has triggered the development
of new sugar and polymer constructs as well as bioproducts. This has
raised the prospects of lignin given its expected availability. Nowadays,
lignin is used as a dispersant, adhesive, and binder, which are still
niche applications. However, lignin represents an interesting source
for the development of advanced materials. This is achieved by taking
advantage of its antioxidant, UV-blocking, antimicrobial, and other
properties. For example, when incorporated in composites, it can provide
increased mechanical, thermal, and barrier effects.[19]Recently, an increased interest has been observed
in structuring
lignin in the form of spherical micro- and nanoparticles.[20,21] Spherical lignin particles can bring several advantages compared
to the amorphous counterparts, for example, in coatings, emulsions,
and composite materials. Among the advantages of using nanosized,
spherical particles, one can cite (a) achieving large surface area-to-volume
ratio, which improves the solubility and boost given properties, such
as antioxidant activity; (b) making materials stronger while often
being lighter; (c) increasing light absorption; and (d) enabling faster
reactions, useful in catalysis.[22] These
interesting properties have stimulated the demonstration of lignin
particles for Pickering emulsions[20,23] and as fillers
to improve the mechanical properties of polymer blends.[24,25] However, to our knowledge, the synthesis of films and coatings from
lignin particles have not been attempted so far.Here, we used
experimental and computational approaches to investigate
the polydisperse lignin particles (LPs) undergoing evaporation-induced
self-assembly. The results offer, for the first time, a discussion
about effects relevant to LP stratification and consolidation, upon
drying, on solid supports. The results demonstrate particulate lignin
systems with tunable structure and porosity. We show that the drying
rate is a controlling factor that defines the coating structure. Our
findings are expected to open new applications for LP in coatings,
paintings, and advanced catalysts.
Experimental
and Computational Methods
Synthesis of the Lignin Particles (LPs)
The lignin
particles were produced with an aerosol-flow reactor according to
our recently reported method.[20] Briefly,
kraft lignin was dissolved in dimethylformamide and used as precursor
solution. The lignin particles were synthesized using a collison-type
jet atomizer with nitrogen gas as carrier. The generated droplets
were suspended at a nitrogen gas flow rate of 3 L/min and carried
to a heated laminar flow stainless steel tube with an inner diameter
and length of 30 and 80 mm, respectively, and kept at 153 °C.
During flow-through, the droplets were dried into solid particles,
which were subsequently cooled and diluted at the reactor downstream
with a turbulent air flow volume of 30 L/min before collection.
EISA of the Lignin Particles
The obtained particles
were used to produce coatings on solid supports. The LPs were casted
with a micropipette on silica substrates. The initial volume fraction
of the LP suspension was 4%. To prepare the suspensions, the given
amount of LP and double distilled water were mixed in plastic vials
under a vortex agitator for a minute. Thereafter, the mixture was
submitted to ultrasound treatment in a bath for a minute. Before casting,
the silica wafers used as solid supports were thoroughly rinsed with
acetone and Milli-Q water, dried with nitrogen, and final UV–O3 exposure for 20 min to eliminate any contamination.To ensure reproducibility and identical coverage, the films were
casted over a circular area of 177 mm2. A well was built
onto the silica surface using a plastic laminate, using a wade punch
to cut a hole in the adhesive laminate, which was subsequently applied
onto the cleaned silica. The coatings were dried under different temperature
conditions (20, 50, 80, and 110 °C) using a Full-Sight Glass
Door Memmert oven equipped with a glass window to monitor the evaporation
process. The fast evaporation at 110 °C produced no bubbles.
The coatings were removed from the oven just after complete evaporation.
To measure the drying rate, separate coatings were casted and placed
into a moisture analyzer equipped with an infrared lamp, whose intensity
was adjusted automatically to heat the sample at different temperatures.
The weight loss upon film evaporation was monitored continuously until
constant weight. The weight was translated into height values using
the area of the films (1.77 cm2) and the density of the
casting suspension (ρS), which was calculated fromwhere ρP and ρL are the densities of the particles
and that of the dispersing
liquid, respectively, and c is the particle concentration
% (w/w).
SEM Analyses
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images
of the cross section and the surface of the coatings were obtained
using a Zeiss Sigma VP, Germany, with an acceleration voltage of 2
kV. Before imaging, the samples were sputtered with a 3 nm platinum
layer. To study the cross section, the coatings were fractured and
the images were taken in the central third of the fracture to avoid
edge artifacts.
Image Analysis of the Cross Sections
The cross sections
of the coatings were analyzed using ImageJ software by using three
areas, namely, bottom, middle, and top. The size of the particles
present in each layer was measured. For the void area determination,
the images of the cross sections were thresholded to obtain binary
images in which the pixels accounted for the RGB values corresponding
to 0, 0, 0 (black) and 255, 255, 255 (white), which could be identified
and quantified over a given area of A × B pixels (where A and B are arbitrary values) to obtain the void area in %.
Computational
Methods
For additional insights into
the EISA response, we modeled the effect of drying rate on a ternary
mixture of colloidal, spherical particles with diameters dL = 230 nm, dM = 130 nm, and dS = 70 nm, where the subscript refers to large
(L), medium (M), or small (S) sizes. Although in the experimental
system, the particle diameters were between 50 and 2000 nm, we used
a ternary set of particle sizes to simplify the computational effort.
The sizes were assumed to correspond to the purely colloidal fraction
of the systems (particles with diameter < 300 nm).The modeling
system consisted of initially randomly distributed particles that
were confined to a simulation box with dimensions L. The coordinates
were set so that the colloidal coating formed along the xy-plane and the z-axis was perpendicular to it. As
the model described a large area, periodic boundary conditions were
applied in the x- and y-directions.
In the z-direction, the volume available to the particles
was capped by a model substrate at one end and by the air–water
interface at the other end. The model substrate plane was at z = 0 throughout the simulation, and the air–water
interface moved from an initial position (at z =
61.4 μm) to z = 4.0 μm at a constant
rate. The moving of the interface was taken to model the drying of
the EISA coating layer. The range covered by the air–water
interface motion (film thickness change upon drying) was set to match
in proportion the change in the drying water droplet height in the
experiments. The system size in the xy-direction
was L = L = 2.0 μm throughout the simulation. The system was set up
so that particles were of equal density ρ = 1.39 g/cm3, matching bulk lignin. The initial volume fraction of the simulation
box filled by the particles was 0.04, and each of the three particle
populations made 1/3 of the total particle volume in the system. This
corresponds to 514 large, 2848 medium, and 18 241 small particles.
The consistency of the response and the effect of finite size effects
were assessed using a system twice as large. Whereas the sediment
thicknesses and sedimentation strength varied, qualitatively, the
response persisted for the larger system.The interaction between
particles was modeled by a short-range
repulsive Yukawa interaction, i.e., the particles were modeled as
screened charged particles that interacted pairwise viawhen r < rc and 0 otherwise. Here, r is the center-of-mass distance
between particles i and j, d and d are the particle diameters, and is their
effective radius following the
Derjaguin approximation. The relative permittivity of the medium εr = 80, the colloidal particle surface potential ϕ =
25 mV, the inverse screening parameter κ–1 = 5 nm, and ε0 is the permittivity of the vacuum.
The colloidal particle surface potential and the screening parameter
were thus chosen to ensure a stable, nonsettling colloidal system
with physically reasonable characteristics. The Yukawa potential was
cutoff at a distance corresponding to 1% of the contact energy.The air–water interface was modeled as a harmonic wall Uw(rw) = k(rw – d)2, when rw < d and 0 otherwise. Here, rw is the distance
of the center of mass of the particle to the wall and k = 40ϵd2 a harmonic force constant. The interaction with the substrate followed
numerically the purely repulsive Lennard-Jones potentialwhere rs is the
distance of the center of mass of the particle to the substrate, the
parameter σ = 100 nm, and the energy scale ϵ converted
to SI units ϵ = 1.39 × 10–19 J.A note of caution is that our approach did not consider evaporation-induced
particle segregation at the air–water interface. The effects
associated with surface tension and liquid evaporation from the interior
of the film were also neglected. In fact, owing to the simplicity
of our model, the contributions of van der Waals, capillary forces,
and structure formation at the air–water-particle interfaces
were omitted. However, they are most relevant to the latter stages
of drying and, therefore, critical for any description of adhesive
interactions between particles or cracking stresses in coatings. Obviously,
a model to accurately capture such factors would be extremely complex.
Despite these issues, we believe that the validity of our model in
describing the experimental observations is justified because the
simulations ended before the effects mentioned above became dominant.
Moreover, their influence on the large-scale, bulk segregation of
particles is limited relative to those represented by our evaporation
model.We assumed that colloidal particles followed Langevin
dynamics[26]where m is particle mass, a⃗ is the acceleration, and U is
the internal energy of the colloidal particles comprising of the pairwise
Yukawa potential Up and possible interactions
with the air–water interface Uw or the substrate Us. r⃗ is the position of particle i, v⃗ is the velocity, and is a
random force that follows a Gaussian
distribution of width . Here, kB is
the Boltzmann constant and T = 0.03ϵ/kb is the temperature. The reduced unit temperature
was set to correspond to approximately room temperature (the experimental
measurement temperature). The friction coefficient ξ = 3πηd was set by the solution viscosity
η. Here, a value of η = 0.89 mPa s, corresponding to water
at room temperature, was employed. Langevin dynamics captures the
Brownian diffusion of the particles but neglects the dynamic contributions
that originate from the hydrodynamic flow.[26]The ordering of the particles was measured in the simulations
by
an order parameter Q6(27)Here, ⟨Y⟩
= ⟨Y(θ(r⃗), φ(r⃗))⟩ is the
mean of the spherical harmonic functions of degree l = 6 and order m is calculated over the
standard spherical coordinate angles θ and φ, corresponding
to the position vectors to the neighboring same-sized particles r⃗ for each particle i. Here, the asterisk denotes complex conjugation. A neighboring
particle was defined as a particle of the same size and residing within
a cutoff rcut = 1.3d,
where d is the particle diameter. The cutoff was
chosen so to capture effectively the nearest neighbors but to exclude
the second nearest neighbors in a close-packed structure. The reported
order parameter value was an average over all the particles of that
size ⟨Q6⟩.
Results
and Discussion
LP Coatings and Morphology
Lignin
particles (LPs) were
casted and dried under controlled conditions. Once dried, smooth and
homogeneous coatings were observed macroscopically (Figure a). The coating layers were
fractured and imaged (SEM) to study particulate stratification along
the out-of-plane direction of the coating, which were divided into
three equidistant layers for analysis: bottom (B), middle (M), and
top (T), Figure b.
The particle size profile was identified in each layer via image analysis
and a polydispersity index of 1.2 was determined from the Sauter diameter d32 (volume-to-surface area) distribution from
23 kiloparticles (kps) counted. As the histogram in Figure c shows, the particles in the
150–300 nm size range were the most abundant; the cumulative
analysis indicated that the median particle size was 250 nm, which
was used as the threshold value to classify the “small”
and “large” size fractions.
Figure 1
Coatings comprising lignin
particles assembled on silica wafers
before and after drying from a dispersion with 4% volume fraction
(a). A representative cross section of the coating is shown in (b)
and divided for image analysis in three sections in the out-of-plane
direction (bottom, middle, and top). The histogram showing the particle
size distribution, by number %, is shown in (c) for a particulate
population of 23 000 units (23 kps) (c). The critical particle
size setting the boundaries of colloidal stability is shown as a function
of drying temperature, indicating a linear relationship (R2 = 0.982) (d).
Coatings comprising lignin
particles assembled on silica wafers
before and after drying from a dispersion with 4% volume fraction
(a). A representative cross section of the coating is shown in (b)
and divided for image analysis in three sections in the out-of-plane
direction (bottom, middle, and top). The histogram showing the particle
size distribution, by number %, is shown in (c) for a particulate
population of 23 000 units (23 kps) (c). The critical particle
size setting the boundaries of colloidal stability is shown as a function
of drying temperature, indicating a linear relationship (R2 = 0.982) (d).The stratification by the size of the particles is evident
in Figure b, but the
polydispersity
of the sample adds a high degree of complexity, and the limit between
particles of true “colloidal” size and those that settle
under gravity is not obvious; this is especially relevant in the case
of particles of low density, such as LP, where the size threshold
for colloidal behavior may be larger compared to that for metal or
inorganic particles. Therefore, before studying the stratification
effects, we identified the size threshold for LP colloidal stability.The particle motion characteristic of colloidal dispersions (constant
and erratic Brownian motion) can hold small particles fully suspended
for an indefinite time. As the particle size is increased, the effects
of Brownian motion become more limited and large particles tend to
settle under gravity if their density (ρP) and that
of the dispersing liquid (ρL) are different enough
(ρP > ρL). Transport processes
fix
the lower limits of colloidal stability in a gravitational field.
Therefore, the critical (or lowest) particle size for which Brownian
motion remains dominant can be obtained by equating the shift produced
by Brownian motion to that produced by the gravity-induced sedimentation.
In a polydisperse system, such limiting particle size allows identifying
threshold value for particles behaving as “colloids”
or as settling units.[28−30] Einstein derived the translational motion of particles
undergoing Brownian diffusion aswhere x̅ is the shift
due to Brownian motion at a certain time t and D is the Einstein’s diffusion coefficient. In the
case of spheres, and under laminar flow, particles diffuse according
to the Stokes–Einstein equationwhere kB is the
Boltzman’s constant (1.38 × 10–16 g
cm2/s2 K), T is the temperature
in K, η is the viscosity of the medium, and R is the radius of the particles. On the other hand, the Stokes’
law of sedimentation gives the distance traveled by spherical particles
upon sedimentation in the period of constant velocity fallwhere h is the distance traveled
by the spherical particles in time t and g is the acceleration of the gravity. Combining eqs –10, we obtainwhich gives the critical particle
size for
which the shift produced by Brownian motion equals the distance traveled
due to sedimentation. In the present work, we considered four drying
conditions and, as can be seen from eq , the critical size depends on T,
the viscosity η, and density of the medium (water) ρL. The critical particle size was calculated for the different
drying temperatures assuming a density of 1.4 g/cm3 for
the lignin particles,[31] and as Figure d shows, a linear
correlation was apparent between the critical size and the drying
temperature.
Particle Stratification
The cross
sections of the coatings
dried under different conditions are shown in Figure , and to ensure proper discrimination of
the colloidal fractions, we used the calculated ∼315 nm as
the lower limit for the critical size for particles dried at 20 °C
(Figure d). The limit
size for colloidal behavior was set at 300 nm, i.e., particles with
sizes <300 nm were assumed to behave as colloids. Noting that there
is a distribution of colloidal particles in the range below 300 nm,
different Péclet numbers (eq ) can be calculated, corresponding to different behaviors
upon drying. Theoretically, all the particles with sizes larger than
the critical value would experience settling. However, in polydisperse
systems, convective effects and hindered settling phenomena, make
it difficult for any effort to set the boundaries for colloidal behavior.
For instance, it is not certain if the particles with sizes slightly
higher than 300 nm behave either as colloids or not; to simplify,
we removed the particles in the 300–800 nm size range from
the analysis. Thus, the stratification effects were identified by
grouping the particles into two bins or fractions, namely, those between
0 and 300 nm (colloids) and >800 nm (settling particles), and we
investigated
how drying affects the particles contained in these fractions, as
a whole.
Figure 2
From top to bottom: SEM cross sections, coating layer thickness,
and number distribution by particle size for the bottom, middle, and
top layers of the particulate assemblies formed under different drying
conditions (temperatures). In all cases, the initial volume fraction
of LPs was the same (same number of particles). For simplicity and
comparison purposes, the particles were divided into 2 bins or fractions,
namely, colloidal (<300 nm) and “settling” particles
(>800 nm). The layer thickness (out-of-plane direction) was divided
into three equidistant zones, bottom, middle, and top, identified
with different colors as a guide to the eyes.
From top to bottom: SEM cross sections, coating layer thickness,
and number distribution by particle size for the bottom, middle, and
top layers of the particulate assemblies formed under different drying
conditions (temperatures). In all cases, the initial volume fraction
of LPs was the same (same number of particles). For simplicity and
comparison purposes, the particles were divided into 2 bins or fractions,
namely, colloidal (<300 nm) and “settling” particles
(>800 nm). The layer thickness (out-of-plane direction) was divided
into three equidistant zones, bottom, middle, and top, identified
with different colors as a guide to the eyes.The diffusion effects upon drying can be identified in Figure . First, taking into
account the colloidal fraction in the upper layer of the assembled
particles (identified with a blue bar on the side, as a guide), there
is a clear tendency for this layer to increase the number of the small
particles with the drying rate. This is caused by the increasing rate
of the descending liquid–air interface upon drying, so that
the colloids do not have enough time to diffuse to lower regions in
the structure.[4,8,15] Considering
the number of colloids in the middle and bottom layers (shown with
the green and red bars drawn on the side), one would expect a continuous
decrease upon drying. However, the experimental results showed an
initial decrease for the coatings dried at 20 and 50 °C, followed
by an increase for those dried above 50 °C (cases at 80 and 110
°C are shown). This observation may be explained by the contribution
of lateral interactions, which affect specially the colloidal size
fraction. When the particles consolidate into a close-packed solid
near the particulate edge (air–liquid interface), upon evaporation,
a flux of material from the fluid center toward the consolidated edge
makes the particles move in the same direction, propagating the front
of close-packed particles across the system.[1] For slow drying (drying at 20 °C), there was enough time for
the colloids to flow toward the drying edge. On the contrary, for
particle dispersions subjected to fast drying, the consolidation of
the systems is so fast that a large number of colloids remained “locked”
in the middle section of the coating layer. Thus, even if the initial
volume fraction was the same in all the systems, the number density
of small particles in the coatings dried at high temperature (80 and
110 °C) was larger in all the layers of the cross sections. This
effect can be observed clearly in the cross sections shown in Figure . The accumulation
of larger quantities of material in the middle part of the coating
area produced an increased layer thickness, Figure . This is further evidence that lateral effects
cannot be neglected in this system.The LP colloidal diffusion
and distribution along the different
layers in each individual cross section was also strongly dependent
on the drying rate. Thus, when the drying rate was very slow, as for
the system dried at 20 °C, the colloids had enough time to diffuse
away from the moving interface. Indeed, one can even find a larger
number density of colloids in the bottom layer of the cross section
(Figure ). Besides
diffusion, the assembly of the bottom layer was also favored by the
downward dragging effect that the settling particles may cause on
the diffusing colloidal fraction. For simplicity, we considered a
regime in which particles were allowed to diffuse and settle freely,
cognizant that the diffusion and settling may be both hindered by
the surrounding particles as the particle number density increases
upon drying. The phenomenon discussed above is not evident in the
images because the very small colloids cannot be identified at the
magnification used for the cross sections shown in Figure . As the drying rate increased,
the segregation of the colloids along the cross section reversed,
and larger number of colloidal particles assembled in the top layer
of the cross sections of coatings after drying at 50, 80, and 110
°C. The segregation reached a maximum in the coating dried at
50 °C and tended to decrease at higher temperatures (drying rates).
This can be explained by the very fast drying tending to “lock”
the colloids in its initial position along the layer. Therefore, fast
drying promoted the accumulation of colloids on
the receding liquid–air interface, but when the drying was
very fast, the layers tended to form maintaining their initial particle
distribution along the thickness. The lower segregation at higher
temperatures can also be explained by the increased concentration
of colloids in the whole cross section caused by the reduced lateral
flow, as discussed previously.The effects of drying rate on
the settling particles, i.e., those
having a diameter >800 nm, were identified from the histograms
from
the cross sections (Figure ). A clear depletion on the large, settling particles occurred
in the bottom layer with increasing drying rate. This was expected
because the fast evaporation rates did not allow enough time for the
settling particles to reach the bottom of the coating, and they were
locked in the upper layers. Then, one would have expected, with the
increased drying rate, to find a higher number of the large particles
(>800 nm) in the middle and top layers; this was not the case in
the
histograms in Figure . This is explained because of the increased concentration of small
particles in the whole cross section at high temperatures (due to
lateral effects, as explained previously) that prevented the observation
(by SEM) of the large particles due to a “masking” artifact.
Nevertheless, some particles of about 2 μm in diameter were
seen in the top layer of the cross sections images of the coatings
dried at high temperatures; in contrast, this did not hold for the
top layer of the coating dried under 20 °C.The distribution
of particles in coatings was studied by modeling
and also experimentally by Cardinal et al.[3] The behavior of the systems accounting Brownian diffusion,
sedimentation, and evaporation were assessed using drying regime maps
that predicted the development of the coating microstructure. They
observed similar structure formation as in our case, but with a bimodal
silica dispersion containing particles sizes of 1 μm and 200
nm, with a top layer entirely composed of smaller particles and a
bottom one with the small particles dispersed between large particles.
Wu and co-workers[32] also observed the particle
size gradients through the thickness of coatings of polydisperse calcium
carbonate, where the smaller particles accumulated on the surface,
whereas larger particles settled.To inquire further into these
interesting observations, Figure a shows the profiles
corresponding to the displacement of the coating top interface upon
drying at given different temperatures. The profiles fitted linear
equations, whose slope allowed identification of the drying rates.
The obtained drying rates showed an exponential relationship with
temperature, inset in Figure a. With the drying rates, the Péclet numbers were calculated
for the colloidal fraction of the coating formed at the given temperature, Figure b. All the Péclet
numbers were higher than unity, which means that the diffusion of
all the colloidal particles was slow compared to the evaporation rates.
Accordingly, for these Péclet numbers, all the colloids would
accumulate near the descending interface, producing a homogeneous
layer of colloidal material on top of the settled material in the
dried coating. However, given the polydisperse nature of our system,
we observed also stratification within the colloids in the upper layer
of the cross sections, with a tendency for the smaller particles to
locate atop the larger ones (Figure c).
Figure 3
Changes in the receding air–dispersion interface
over time
as a function of drying temperature (a). The inset corresponds to
the evaporation rate as a function of temperature. The relationship
between Péclet number and particle size is illustrated with
the profiles in (b). The inset corresponds to a plot of the Péclet
number as a function of drying temperature for 200 nm LP. The SEM
cross section of a coating or particle assembly after drying at 110
°C is shown in (c) with a detailed view of the distribution of
colloids of size <150 nm, within the top layer. Symbol nomenclature:
◆: 20 °C; ●: 50 °C; ■: 80 °C;
▲: 110 °C.
Changes in the receding air–dispersion interface
over time
as a function of drying temperature (a). The inset corresponds to
the evaporation rate as a function of temperature. The relationship
between Péclet number and particle size is illustrated with
the profiles in (b). The inset corresponds to a plot of the Péclet
number as a function of drying temperature for 200 nm LP. The SEM
cross section of a coating or particle assembly after drying at 110
°C is shown in (c) with a detailed view of the distribution of
colloids of size <150 nm, within the top layer. Symbol nomenclature:
◆: 20 °C; ●: 50 °C; ■: 80 °C;
▲: 110 °C.
Modeling of LP Particulate Coatings
To resolve the
origins of the observed behavior of the LP colloidal fraction and
to gain additional insights into the observed stratification in the
upper layer, we modeled the behavior of the colloidal fraction of
the particles by assuming a ternary mixture of spherical particles
under varying drying rates. Figure includes a summary of the sedimentation response obtained
in the simulations via graphical visualization, analysis of the particle
distribution in terms of occupied volume, the Péclet numbers,
and the time evolution of the Q6 order
parameter for the three particle populations. The simulations indicated
that for the colloidal particle population described here, the strength
of stratification was strongly dependent on the drying rate, as seen
in Figure a,b, which
show both visually and via the calculated particle volume fraction
the dependency for three different drying rates. As expected, slower
drying favored a dominant Brownian motion effect and a mixing of the
particles occurred. However, the data show that the least degree of
mixing of particles sizes in the out-of-plane (z)
direction was obtained with the intermediate drying rate. Also, a
faster rate deteriorated the ordering.
Figure 4
Results from computational
modeling assuming a LP population that
included three different sizes, as shown in different colors (green,
magenta, and white for small, medium, and large colloidal sizes),
respectively. The graphical visualizations of simulated coatings are
shown in (a), whereas the corresponding particle volume fraction distributions
are included in (b). The Péclet numbers for the investigated
drying rates and particle sizes are determined in (c). Q6 order parameter calculated for the coating dried at
a rate 43.7 μm/s (d). The fraction of simulation time τ
is the simulation time normalized by the entire duration of the drying
process.
Results from computational
modeling assuming a LP population that
included three different sizes, as shown in different colors (green,
magenta, and white for small, medium, and large colloidal sizes),
respectively. The graphical visualizations of simulated coatings are
shown in (a), whereas the corresponding particle volume fraction distributions
are included in (b). The Péclet numbers for the investigated
drying rates and particle sizes are determined in (c). Q6 order parameter calculated for the coating dried at
a rate 43.7 μm/s (d). The fraction of simulation time τ
is the simulation time normalized by the entire duration of the drying
process.The simulations were conducted
for drying under three different
rates as measured by the velocity of the receding air–dispersion
interface (8.74, 43.7, or 349 μm/s). These considered drying
rates clearly exceeded those measured in the experiments, with the
exception of the slowest one, which was of the same order. The higher
rates used in the computation, compared to those in the experiments,
were selected for the model system to equilibrate via Brownian motion
at a significantly faster speed to that in the experiments. This is
because (1) the system size was smaller and the formed coating was
thinner and (2) the Péclet number ratio calculated between
the large and small particles in the ternary mixture of the model
system was smaller than measured experimentally, see Figure c for the Péclet numbers
in the simulations. This is due to the smaller relative difference
in the particle size. As a consequence, the modeled rates need to
be significantly higher to capture similar response as in the experimental
system.The response was systematic for drying rates beyond
the presented
one and over small variations of particle sizes in the ternary mixture;
however, quite intuitively, similar particle mixing deteriorated the
ordering. Due to the better mixing of similar-size particles, the
polydisperse experimental system showed, as expected, a gradual change
in the colloid particle concentration as a function of distance from
the interface, as Figure c. An optimal drying rate for a higher degree of stratification
occurred from the combination of diffusion-led mixing of the particles
and glassy particle jamming in the sediment due to a solvent evaporation
that was faster than particle diffusion; at slow drying rates, the
diffusion mixing dominated and at faster rates, particles locked in
the bottom layer. An optimal stratification was obtained somewhere
in the middle, where the particles could diffuse sufficiently to differ
in the degree of settling ordering.Fortini et al.[4] reported similar behavior
for blends of colloids with very different Péclet numbers (PeB = 100 and PeS = 14 for big and small colloids, respectively, PeB/PeS ≈ 7) joined by
other very recent reports.[5,7] Comparing experiments
and simulations, they identified a gradient of osmotic pressure driven
by the descending interface that pushed the larger particles away
from the moving interface faster than it did the smaller ones. Figures b and 4c include the experiments with large difference in Péclet
numbers for the big and small colloids and for the given drying ratios. PeB/PeS was always
∼6 in the experiments for the coatings dried at the various
temperatures. For the simulations, the ratio varied between 2 and
3, but more rapid drying rates were consequently employed. Actually,
the interplay of the Péclet number ratio and the drying rate
drove the segregation of coatings of different particle compositions.To assess the stratification process in the model system, the time
evolution in Figure d of the Q6 order parameter was calculated
for the particles in the coating dried at 43.7 μm/s. Here, τ
= 0 corresponds to the beginning and τ = 1.0 to the end of drying.
The data show that in the range 0.2–0.8τ, the largest
particles underwent systematically the highest Q6 values, whereas the lowest order parameter value corresponded
to the medium-sized particles. The higher value of Q6 for the large and small particles, in comparison to
the medium-sized ones, is related to the presence of the substrate
and the air/water interface. These limited the mixing of the small
and the large particles. Interestingly, for each particle type, the
profiles exhibited a maximum just before reaching the final thickness
and then dropped significantly. We propose that this decrease in Q6 order parameter at the very last stages of
drying is related to the increased compaction of the coating due to
the moving interface pushing the smaller particles between the larger
ones.Although the Péclet ratio PeB/PeS was constant for all the
drying
conditions, significant differences were observed on the microstructure
of the top surface or layer (Figure ). As shown in the inset of Figure b, for a given particle size, the Péclet
number increased exponentially with drying rate (temperature). Moreover,
the segregation of the particles was more sensitive for low Péclet
numbers, Figure .
Thus, a lower number density of colloidal material was found on the
top layer of the coating dried at the slower rates (Figure a). For faster drying conditions
(Figure b–d),
similar amount of colloidal material was observed on the top layer.
Figure 5
SEM images
of the top surface of coatings dried at different temperatures:
20 °C (a), 50 °C (b), 80 °C (c), and 110 °C (d).
The red arrow in (d) indicates the unusual presence of particles of
the largest size (>2 μm, normally, settling particles) on
the
top layer of the coating formed at the fastest drying rate (110 °C).
The schematic illustration in (e) highlights the differences in the
observed (⌀o) and actual (⌀a)
diameters of the large particles that assemble atop the coating.
SEM images
of the top surface of coatings dried at different temperatures:
20 °C (a), 50 °C (b), 80 °C (c), and 110 °C (d).
The red arrow in (d) indicates the unusual presence of particles of
the largest size (>2 μm, normally, settling particles) on
the
top layer of the coating formed at the fastest drying rate (110 °C).
The schematic illustration in (e) highlights the differences in the
observed (⌀o) and actual (⌀a)
diameters of the large particles that assemble atop the coating.Note that large particles (∼1
μm) were observed on
the surfaces, even if not clearly displayed because of the “burying”
effect in the dried structure that somewhat hid them (see particles
pointed with the red arrow in Figure d). This effect was driven by the colloidally enriched
falling interface, resulting in an embedding of large particles into
the colloidal fraction. As shown in Figure e, when two large particles of given sizes
were embedded in a bed of small particles, the latter ones obscured
the determination of the actual size of the former. The difference
between the exposed and real size of the particles was higher for
the large ones; therefore, for those particles, the sizing error was
larger. Keeping this in mind, large particles, of about 1 μm,
were identified on the surface of coatings obtained at a fast drying
rate. Even larger particles (>2 μm, normally, settling particles)
were observed on the top layer of the coating dried at the fastest
drying conditions (110 °C), which were not seen in the other
cases (red arrows in Figure d). This is explained by the very fast evaporation rate in
these conditions, and in line with our hypothesis to explain the presence
of large particles on the top layer.
Particle Packing Analysis
The dense packing of equal-size
spheres into the so-called cubic close packing or hexagonal close
packing cannot produce a higher packing density than that predicted
by the well-known Kepler conjecture. This states that no packing of
congruent balls in Euclidean three space has a density greater than
that of the face-centered cubic packing with a density of π/√18
≈ 0.74.[33] Then, if smaller particles
are blended with larger ones in the right proportion, the density
of packing can be substantially increased, giving rise to the so-called
second- and third-generational packing.When considering real
polydisperse systems, the particle size distributions, and therefore
the ratio between large and small particles, may not be optimal for
the highest packing density. Santiso et al.[34] studied the packing of polydisperse systems and found that the packing
fraction may be larger than the highest packing assumed for monodisperse
systems, >0.74. In the present work, the areas of the coating layer
devoid of particles were identified in the three layers of the cross
sections by means of image analysis, Figure a. As shown in Figure b, the void area % in all the layers of the
films dried at low rates (20 °C) was higher than those in the
films dried at higher rates. This is indicative that the drying rate
promoted a denser and tightly packed structure. These observations
explain the obtained coating thickness displayed for the same condition
in Figure . Considering
the effect of drying rates within the layers (Figure a), the void area % remained constant except
for the top layer of the coating dried at the fastest rate (110 °C).
It appears that a higher drying rate promoted an increased porosity,
especially for the top layer of the coatings, and this effect may
be related to the higher number of large particles on the top (Figure ). Due to the fast
drying, very large particles assembled on the top, promoting a less-packed
structure.
Figure 6
Void area distribution for the different LP coating layers obtained
after drying at given rates (or temperatures) (a). The coating sections,
bottom, middle, and top, were analyzed via imaging to obtain the profiles
shown on the right. The plot in (b) summarizes the change in void
area for the three layer sections assembled at the given temperature.
The total particle volume fraction in the coating layer as a function
of the drying temperature is shown in (c).
Void area distribution for the different LP coating layers obtained
after drying at given rates (or temperatures) (a). The coating sections,
bottom, middle, and top, were analyzed via imaging to obtain the profiles
shown on the right. The plot in (b) summarizes the change in void
area for the three layer sections assembled at the given temperature.
The total particle volume fraction in the coating layer as a function
of the drying temperature is shown in (c).The particle volume fraction in the coatings was extrapolated
taking
into account the volume of the coating (surface and thickness) and
the LP density (1.4 g/cm3). As depicted in Figure c, the particle volume fraction
ranged between 0.6 and 0.8, which agrees with the postulation of Santiso
et al. for polydisperse systems.[34] The
particle volume fraction tended to increase with increasing drying
rate (temperatures between 20 and 80 °C), but then decreased
drastically at the highest drying rate (110 °C). This is in accordance
with the increased void area % and our image analyses.
Lignin Particle
Coatings and Prospects
Lignin has been
used to produce supported, continuous films to study enzyme and polymer
adsorption[35,36] and also in bicomponent films
of cellulose–lignin to model the action of cellulases and adsorption
of proteins (Figure ).[37,38] Lignin has also been used to produce fibers
in electrospun mats. For example, Ago et al.[39,40] obtained electrospun fibers with lignin as the main component in
aqueous dispersions. They related the bulk composition of the fibers
with the surface distribution of the polymer for tailoring webs for
different applications. In all such efforts, lignin has been dissolved
before the formation of films or fibers. However, lignin utilization
in coatings, in the form of particulate coatings, has remained unexplored
(Figure ). There are
many reasons to use micro- and nanoparticles, and in the case of lignin,
their nanoparticles help preserving its structure, composition, and
colloidal features.[22] The closely related
cellulose, in its native, regenerated, and nanostructured forms have
been used to produce films, alone or in combination with synthetic
polymers. In contrast to monodispersed particle systems, the use of
polydisperse particles is highly relevant and attractive. For example,
to enable high mechanical resistance, as in concrete and hard ceramics,
extremely dense granular packing is needed, which is possible only
if polydisperse systems are used.[41] The
polydispersity also has an influence on the permeation of fluids through
the porous media. For instance, the permeability greatly depends on
the stratification degree and the spatial and size distribution of
the particles.[42] Therefore, the adoption
of polydisperse particulate systems allows tailoring the stratification
and thus fluid transport. Moreover, low viscosities can be achieved
with these systems when dispersed in a liquid medium,[43] increasing the resistance to cracking, enhancing processability,
making synthesis easier, among others. Thus, the results of the present
study provides new insights into the use of lignin particles. While
keeping the advantages of lignin as a macromolecule that forms renewable,
organic particles, the possibility of synthesizing structured films
and coatings self-assembled during drying[44] brings a huge opportunity for the design or modification of novel
material structures.
Figure 7
Different approaches in which lignin can been used to
produce films,
coatings, fibers, and fiber webs. Cellulose, lignin, and synthetic
polymers are represented in green, blue, and orange, respectively.
Given the processing routes to achieve films[35−38] and fibers and webs.[39,40] The case of mono- and polydispersed films and coatings with particulate
lignin systems brings a new dimension in the utilization of such renewable,
widely available and inexpensive bioresource.[20,22]
Different approaches in which lignin can been used to
produce films,
coatings, fibers, and fiber webs. Cellulose, lignin, and synthetic
polymers are represented in green, blue, and orange, respectively.
Given the processing routes to achieve films[35−38] and fibers and webs.[39,40] The case of mono- and polydispersed films and coatings with particulate
lignin systems brings a new dimension in the utilization of such renewable,
widely available and inexpensive bioresource.[20,22]
Conclusions
We
used, for the first time, lignin particles (LPs) to synthesize
structured layers via evaporation-induced self-assembly into coatings
and films. The structure of the LP assemblies correlated with drying
rate, as determined both by experimental and simulation efforts. A
colloidal threshold of 300 nm in size was calculated for the polydisperse
particulate system by using the shift produced by Brownian motion
and that of settling. The particle size measurements along cross-sectional
analyses (SEM) allowed the identification of the diffusion effects
upon drying, and the results revealed a clear increase in the number
density of the particles of small sizes on the top layer formed at
increased drying rates owing to the effects of the receding air–liquid
interface. On the contrary, slow drying and dragging effects led to
a more homogeneous distribution of the colloids in the out-of-plane
direction of the coating. The colloidal segregation within the different
coating layers reached a maximum at intermediate drying rates and
tended to decrease at higher drying rates. A “locking”
effect of the particles in the film dried at fast drying rates was
found to be responsible for (i) lower colloidal segregation; (ii)
accumulation of large particles on the top coating layer; (iii) increased
thickness, and (iv) larger number of colloidal particles in the middle
section of the film. The Péclet number for the colloidal fraction
revealed that the formation of the coating layer was driven by evaporation
rather than diffusion. However, stratification was observed within
the colloids in the upper layers, with the smaller particles on top.
We explored the origins of this observation by simulations and propose
that the colloidal, polydisperse fraction has an optimal drying rate
for maximal particular size segregation. This effect largely depends
on the differences between the particulate Péclet numbers.
The particle packing analysis revealed that by increasing the drying
rates, it is possible to form dense and highly packed structures.
However, extreme rates reverse this effect and promote an increased
porosity, especially in the top layer of the coatings.In sum,
we demonstrated that it is possible to produce LPs coatings
and films whose structure can be tuned by adjusting the drying conditions.
This provides a first insight into the possibilities of using polydisperse
LP-based systems for applications that could include coatings, catalysis,
barrier materials, flexible electronics, drug-release, among others.
Authors: André Utgenannt; Ross Maspero; Andrea Fortini; Rebecca Turner; Marian Florescu; Christopher Jeynes; Antonios G Kanaras; Otto L Muskens; Richard P Sear; Joseph L Keddie Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2016-01-27 Impact factor: 15.881
Authors: Andrea Fortini; Ignacio Martín-Fabiani; Jennifer Lesage De La Haye; Pierre-Yves Dugas; Muriel Lansalot; Franck D'Agosto; Elodie Bourgeat-Lami; Joseph L Keddie; Richard P Sear Journal: Phys Rev Lett Date: 2016-03-18 Impact factor: 9.161
Authors: Farai T Carter; Radoslaw M Kowalczyk; Ian Millichamp; Malcolm Chainey; Joseph L Keddie Journal: Langmuir Date: 2014-08-06 Impact factor: 3.882
Authors: Blaise L Tardy; Bruno D Mattos; Caio G Otoni; Marco Beaumont; Johanna Majoinen; Tero Kämäräinen; Orlando J Rojas Journal: Chem Rev Date: 2021-08-20 Impact factor: 72.087
Authors: J Y Zhu; Umesh P Agarwal; Peter N Ciesielski; Michael E Himmel; Runan Gao; Yulin Deng; Maria Morits; Monika Österberg Journal: Biotechnol Biofuels Date: 2021-05-06 Impact factor: 6.040