Literature DB >> 25058916

Correlating particle deformation with water concentration profiles during latex film formation: reasons that softer latex films take longer to dry.

Farai T Carter1, Radoslaw M Kowalczyk, Ian Millichamp, Malcolm Chainey, Joseph L Keddie.   

Abstract

During the past two decades, an improved understanding of the operative particle deformation mechanisms during latex film formation has been gained. For a particular colloidal dispersion, the Routh-Russel deformation maps predict the dominant mechanism for particle deformation under a particular set of conditions (evaporation rate, temperature, and initial film thickness). Although qualitative tests of the Routh-Russel model have been reported previously, a systematic study of the relationship between the film-formation conditions and the resulting water concentration profiles is lacking. Here, the water distributions during the film formation of a series of acrylic copolymer latexes with varying glass-transition temperatures, Tg (values of -22, -11, 4, and 19 °C), have been obtained using GARField nuclear magnetic resonance profiling. A significant reduction in the rate of water loss from the latex copolymer with the lowest Tg was found, which is explained by its relatively low polymer viscosity enabling the growth of a coalesced skin layer. The set of processing parameters where the drying first becomes impeded occurs at the boundary between the capillary deformation and the wet sintering regimes of the Routh-Russel model, which provides strong confirmation of the model's validity. An inverse correlation between the model's dimensionless control parameter and the dimensionless drying time is discovered, which is useful for the design of fast-drying waterborne films.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 25058916     DOI: 10.1021/la5023505

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langmuir        ISSN: 0743-7463            Impact factor:   3.882


  7 in total

1.  How Particle Deformability Influences the Surfactant Distribution in Colloidal Polymer Films.

Authors:  Toby R Palmer; Hanne M van der Kooij; Rohani Abu Bakar; Mathis Duewel; Katja Greiner; Callum D McAleese; Pierre Couture; Matthew K Sharpe; Richard W Smith; Joseph L Keddie
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 4.331

2.  Chemical vs. mechanical microstructure evolution in drying colloid and polymer coatings.

Authors:  Thitiporn Kaewpetch; James F Gilchrist
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Integrating optical coherence tomography with gravimetric and video analysis (OCT-Gravimetry-Video method) for studying the drying process of polystyrene latex system.

Authors:  Hao Huang; Yongyang Huang; Willie Lau; H Daniel Ou-Yang; Chao Zhou; Mohamed S El-Aasser
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Film Formation of High Tg Latex Using Hydroplasticization: Explanations from NMR Relaxometry.

Authors:  Benjamin Voogt; Hendrik P Huinink; Sebastiaan J F Erich; Jurgen Scheerder; Paul Venema; Joseph L Keddie; Olaf C G Adan
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 3.882

5.  NMR Profiling of Reaction and Transport in Thin Layers: A Review.

Authors:  Ruben Nicasy; Henk Huinink; Bart Erich; Adan Olaf
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 4.329

6.  Hydroxyethyl sulfone based reactive coalescing agents for low-VOC waterborne coatings.

Authors:  Jagjit Kaur; Ranganathan Krishnan; Balamurugan Ramalingam; Satyasankar Jana
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 3.361

7.  Particulate Coatings via Evaporation-Induced Self-Assembly of Polydisperse Colloidal Lignin on Solid Interfaces.

Authors:  Oriol Cusola; Samu Kivistö; Sampsa Vierros; Piotr Batys; Mariko Ago; Blaise L Tardy; Luiz G Greca; M Blanca Roncero; Maria Sammalkorpi; Orlando J Rojas
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 3.882

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.