Literature DB >> 29718452

Accuracy of Activity Trackers in Parkinson Disease: Should We Prescribe Them?

Nicholas Wendel1, Chelsea E Macpherson2, Karoline Webber3, Kathryn Hendron4, Tamara DeAngelis5, Cristina Colon-Semenza6, Terry Ellis7.   

Abstract

Background: Wearable, consumer-grade activity trackers have become widely available as a means of monitoring physical activity in the form of step counts. However, step counts may not be accurate in persons with Parkinson disease (PD) due to atypical gait characteristics. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the accuracy of 4 consumer-grade activity trackers in individuals with PD while ambulating during continuous and discontinuous walking tasks. Design: This study used a cross-sectional design.
Methods: Thirty-three persons with PD (Hoehn & Yahr stages 1-3) donned 4 models of activity trackers on the less affected side of their bodies. Participants performed 2 continuous walking tasks (2-minute walk tests at comfortable and fast speeds) and 2 discontinuous walking tasks (a simulated household course and an obstacle negotiation course) in an outpatient setting. Bland-Altman plots and intraclass correlation coefficients [ICC(2,1)] were computed as a measure of agreement between actual steps taken (reference standard: video recording) and steps recorded by each tracker.
Results: The accuracy of the activity trackers varied widely, with ICCs ranging from -0.03 to 0.98. Overall, the most accurate device across all tasks was the Fitbit Zip, and the least accurate was the Jawbone Up Move during the simulated household course. All activity trackers were more accurate for continuous walking tasks compared with discontinuous walking tasks. Waist-mounted devices were more accurate than wrist-mounted devices with continuous tasks. Bland-Altman plots revealed that all activity trackers underestimated step counts. Limitations: All walking tasks were measured over relatively short distances. Conclusions: In persons with mild-to-moderate PD, waist-worn activity trackers may be prescribed to monitor bouts of continuous walking with reasonable accuracy; however, activity trackers have little utility in monitoring discontinuous walking common in household settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29718452     DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzy054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Ther        ISSN: 0031-9023


  12 in total

1.  Accuracy of Step Count Estimations in Parkinson's Disease Can Be Predicted Using Ambulatory Monitoring.

Authors:  Navid Shokouhi; Hamid Khodakarami; Chathurini Fernando; Sarah Osborn; Malcolm Horne
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 5.702

Review 2.  Objective Measurement of Walking Activity Using Wearable Technologies in People with Parkinson Disease: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Mathias Baptiste Correno; Clint Hansen; Thomas Carlin; Nicolas Vuillerme
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 3.847

3.  A Comparison of Activity Monitor Data from Devices Worn on the Wrist and the Waist in People with Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Dong Wook Kim; Leanne M Hassett; Vanessa Nguy; Natalie E Allen
Journal:  Mov Disord Clin Pract       Date:  2019-10-18

4.  Engaging Older Adults With Parkinson's Disease in Physical Activity Using Technology: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Melinda Hermanns; Barbara K Haas; Jerome Lisk
Journal:  Gerontol Geriatr Med       Date:  2019-04-30

5.  Activity monitor use among persons with multiple sclerosis: Report on rate, pattern, and association with physical activity levels.

Authors:  Stephanie L Silveira; Robert W Motl
Journal:  Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin       Date:  2019-11-09

6.  The Views and Needs of People With Parkinson Disease Regarding Wearable Devices for Disease Monitoring: Mixed Methods Exploration.

Authors:  Lorna Kenny; Kevin Moore; Clíona O' Riordan; Siobhan Fox; John Barton; Salvatore Tedesco; Marco Sica; Colum Crowe; Antti Alamäki; Joan Condell; Anna Nordström; Suzanne Timmons
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2022-01-06

Review 7.  EVIDENCE Publication Checklist for Studies Evaluating Connected Sensor Technologies: Explanation and Elaboration.

Authors:  Christine Manta; Nikhil Mahadevan; Jessie Bakker; Simal Ozen Irmak; Elena Izmailova; Siyeon Park; Jiat-Ling Poon; Santosh Shevade; Sarah Valentine; Benjamin Vandendriessche; Courtney Webster; Jennifer C Goldsack
Journal:  Digit Biomark       Date:  2021-05-18

8.  Accuracy and Precision of Three Consumer-Grade Motion Sensors During Overground and Treadmill Walking in People With Parkinson Disease: Cross-Sectional Comparative Study.

Authors:  Byron Lai; Jeffer E Sasaki; Brenda Jeng; Katie L Cederberg; Marcas M Bamman; Robert W Motl
Journal:  JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol       Date:  2020-01-16

9.  Accelerometer output and its association with energy expenditure in persons with mild-to-moderate Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Brenda Jeng; Katie L J Cederberg; Byron Lai; Jeffer E Sasaki; Marcas M Bamman; Robert W Motl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Reliability and Validity of Commercially Available Wearable Devices for Measuring Steps, Energy Expenditure, and Heart Rate: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Daniel Fuller; Emily Colwell; Jonathan Low; Kassia Orychock; Melissa Ann Tobin; Bo Simango; Richard Buote; Desiree Van Heerden; Hui Luan; Kimberley Cullen; Logan Slade; Nathan G A Taylor
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 4.773

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.