Taeho Greg Rhee1,2, Richard A Marottoli1,3, Peter H Van Ness1, Mary E Tinetti1,3. 1. Section of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut. 2. Yale Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Yale-New Haven Health, Connecticut. 3. Dorothy Adler Geriatric Assessment Center, Yale-New Haven Hospital, Connecticut.
Abstract
Objectives: To examine patterns and perceived benefits of seven major complementary health approaches (CHA) among older adults in the United States. Methods: Data from the 2012 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), which represents non-institutionalized adults aged 65 or older (n = 7,116 unweighted), were used. We elicited seven most common CHA used in older adults, which are acupuncture, herbal therapies, chiropractic, massage, meditation, Tai Chi, and yoga. Survey participants were asked to self-report perceived benefits (eg, maintaining health and stress reduction) in their CHA used. We estimated prevalence and perceived benefits of CHA use. We also investigated socio-demographic and clinical factors associated with the use of any of these seven CHA. Results: Overall, 29.2% of older adults used any of seven CHA in the past year. Most commonly used CHA included herbal therapies (18.1%), chiropractic (8.4%), and massage (5.7%). More than 60% of older CHA users reported that CHA were important for maintaining health and well-being. Other perceived benefits included improving overall health and feeling better (52.3%), giving a better sense of control over health (27.4%), and making it easier to cope with health problems (24.7%). Older adults with higher education and income levels, ≥2 chronic conditions, and functional limitations had greater odds of using CHA (p < .01, respectively). Conclusion: A substantial number of older CHA users reported CHA-related benefits. CHA may play a crucial role in improving health status among older adults. At the population level, further research on the effects of CHA use on bio-psycho-social outcomes is needed to promote healthy aging in older adults.
Objectives: To examine patterns and perceived benefits of seven major complementary health approaches (CHA) among older adults in the United States. Methods: Data from the 2012 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), which represents non-institutionalized adults aged 65 or older (n = 7,116 unweighted), were used. We elicited seven most common CHA used in older adults, which are acupuncture, herbal therapies, chiropractic, massage, meditation, Tai Chi, and yoga. Survey participants were asked to self-report perceived benefits (eg, maintaining health and stress reduction) in their CHA used. We estimated prevalence and perceived benefits of CHA use. We also investigated socio-demographic and clinical factors associated with the use of any of these seven CHA. Results: Overall, 29.2% of older adults used any of seven CHA in the past year. Most commonly used CHA included herbal therapies (18.1%), chiropractic (8.4%), and massage (5.7%). More than 60% of older CHA users reported that CHA were important for maintaining health and well-being. Other perceived benefits included improving overall health and feeling better (52.3%), giving a better sense of control over health (27.4%), and making it easier to cope with health problems (24.7%). Older adults with higher education and income levels, ≥2 chronic conditions, and functional limitations had greater odds of using CHA (p < .01, respectively). Conclusion: A substantial number of older CHA users reported CHA-related benefits. CHA may play a crucial role in improving health status among older adults. At the population level, further research on the effects of CHA use on bio-psycho-social outcomes is needed to promote healthy aging in older adults.
Authors: Roger Chou; Richard Deyo; Janna Friedly; Andrea Skelly; Robin Hashimoto; Melissa Weimer; Rochelle Fu; Tracy Dana; Paul Kraegel; Jessica Griffin; Sara Grusing; Erika D Brodt Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2017-02-14 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Claire D Johnson; Craig S Little; Tamara A Sterling; Scott Gojkovich; Karlos Boghosian; Michael A Ciolfi Journal: J Manipulative Physiol Ther Date: 2020-04-20 Impact factor: 1.437
Authors: Philip R Schalow; Kelly A Kimball; Frederick T Schurger; George R Sooley; Scott P Bales; Roderic P Rochester; Robert T Brooks; Julie M Hunt Journal: J Chiropr Med Date: 2022-04-06