Literature DB >> 17956965

A systematic review of beliefs involved in the use of complementary and alternative medicine.

Felicity L Bishop1, Lucy Yardley, George T Lewith.   

Abstract

People might be attracted to and use complementary and alternative medicines (CAM) because they hold beliefs that are congruent with CAM. This article collates, examines and synthesizes the evidence surrounding this hypothesis. Most studies are cross-sectional and focus on a limited number of beliefs. Multivariate studies suggest that beliefs related to control and participation, perceptions of illness, holism and natural treatments, and general philosophies of life predict CAM use when controlling for demographic and clinical factors. Further research should examine the robustness of these relationships in different illness groups and the prospective relationships among beliefs and CAM use over time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17956965     DOI: 10.1177/1359105307082447

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Psychol        ISSN: 1359-1053


  78 in total

1.  Integrated medicine in the management of chronic illness: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Sarah B Brien; Felicity L Bishop; Kirsty Riggs; David Stevenson; Victoria Freire; George Lewith
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Use and acceptance of complementary and alternative medicine among the general population and medical personnel: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michael Frass; Robert Paul Strassl; Helmut Friehs; Michael Müllner; Michael Kundi; Alan D Kaye
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2012

Review 3.  Views on traditional Chinese medicine amongst Chinese population: a systematic review of qualitative and quantitative studies.

Authors:  Vincent C H Chung; Polly H X Ma; Chun Hong Lau; Samuel Y S Wong; Eng Kiong Yeoh; Sian M Griffiths
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Measuring differential beliefs in complementary therapy research: an exploration of the Complementary and Alternative Medicine Beliefs Inventory (CAMBI).

Authors:  Joseph G Grzywacz; Rebecca Neiberg; Sara A Quandt; Wei Lang; Ronny A Bell; Thomas A Arcury
Journal:  Complement Ther Med       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 2.446

5.  Changes among male and female visitors to practitioners of complementary and alternative medicine in a large adult Norwegian population from 1997 to 2008 (The HUNT studies).

Authors:  Aslak Steinsbekk; Marit B Rise; Roar Johnsen
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 3.659

6.  Use of complementary and alternative medicine in a large sample of anxiety patients.

Authors:  Alexander Bystritsky; Sarit Hovav; Cathy Sherbourne; Murray B Stein; Raphael D Rose; Laura Campbell-Sills; Daniela Golinelli; Greer Sullivan; Michelle G Craske; Peter P Roy-Byrne
Journal:  Psychosomatics       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 2.386

7.  Room for improvement: complementary therapy users and the Australian health system.

Authors:  Vivian Lin; Rachel Canaway; Bronwyn Carter; Lenore Manderson
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  A survey investigating the associations between self-management practices and quality of life in cancer survivors.

Authors:  C Shneerson; T Taskila; S Greenfield; N Gale
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Attitudes toward antiretroviral therapy and complementary and alternative medicine in Chinese patients infected with HIV.

Authors:  Wei-Ti Chen; Cheng-Shi Shiu; Jane Simoni; Karen Fredriksen-Goldsen; Fujie Zhang; Helene Starks; Hongxin Zhao
Journal:  J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.354

10.  Implicit Reasons for Disclosure of the Use of Complementary Health Approaches (CHA): a Consumer Commitment Perspective.

Authors:  Fuschia M Sirois; Helene Riess; Dawn M Upchurch
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2017-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.