Literature DB >> 29717412

Visual recognition of mirrored letters and the right hemisphere advantage for mirror-invariant object recognition.

Matthew T Harrison1, Lars Strother2.   

Abstract

Unlike most objects, letter recognition is closely tied to orientation and mirroring, which in some cases (e.g., b and d), defines letter identity altogether. We combined a divided field paradigm with a negative priming procedure to examine the relationship between mirror generalization, its suppression during letter recognition, and language-related visual processing in the left hemisphere. In our main experiment, observers performed a centrally viewed letter-recognition task, followed by an object-recognition task performed in either the right or the left visual hemifield. The results show clear evidence of inhibition of mirror generalization for objects viewed in either hemifield but a right hemisphere advantage for visual recognition of mirrored and repeated objects. Our findings are consistent with an opponent relationship between symmetry-related visual processing in the right hemisphere and neurally recycled mechanisms in the left hemisphere used for visual processing of written language stimuli.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cerebral laterality; Mirror generalization; Object recognition; Symmetry perception; Visual perception

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29717412      PMCID: PMC6501580          DOI: 10.3758/s13423-018-1472-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  27 in total

1.  Viewpoint-invariant and viewpoint-dependent object recognition in dissociable neural subsystems.

Authors:  E D Burgund; C J Marsolek
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-09

2.  Multiple levels of visual object constancy revealed by event-related fMRI of repetition priming.

Authors:  P Vuilleumier; R N Henson; J Driver; R J Dolan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Breaking the symmetry: mirror discrimination for single letters but not for pictures in the Visual Word Form Area.

Authors:  Felipe Pegado; Kimihiro Nakamura; Laurent Cohen; Stanislas Dehaene
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 4.  The neural code for written words: a proposal.

Authors:  Stanislas Dehaene; Laurent Cohen; Mariano Sigman; Fabien Vinckier
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  The divided visual field paradigm: methodological considerations.

Authors:  Victoria J Bourne
Journal:  Laterality       Date:  2006-07

6.  Symmetry activates extrastriate visual cortex in human and nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Yuka Sasaki; Wim Vanduffel; Tamara Knutsen; Christopher Tyler; Roger Tootell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-02-14       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Why do children make mirror errors in reading? Neural correlates of mirror invariance in the visual word form area.

Authors:  Stanislas Dehaene; Kimihiro Nakamura; Antoinette Jobert; Chihiro Kuroki; Seiji Ogawa; Laurent Cohen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-09-19       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

9.  Is inhibitory control involved in discriminating pseudowords that contain the reversible letters b and d?

Authors:  Lorie-Marlène Brault Foisy; Emmanuel Ahr; Steve Masson; Olivier Houdé; Grégoire Borst
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2017-06-20

10.  The Occipital Face Area Is Causally Involved in Facial Viewpoint Perception.

Authors:  Tim C Kietzmann; Sonia Poltoratski; Peter König; Randolph Blake; Frank Tong; Sam Ling
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.