| Literature DB >> 29716709 |
B Hygriv Rao1, Mohammed Sadiq Azam2, Geetesh Manik3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This is a case series of consecutive patients with past myocardial infarction presenting with Electrical Storm (ES) of unstable ventricular tachycardia (VT) treated by a protocol directed algorithm.Entities:
Keywords: Catheter ablation; Electrical storm; Electro anatomic mapping; Substrate modification; Ventricular tachycardia
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29716709 PMCID: PMC5993910 DOI: 10.1016/j.ihj.2017.07.011
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian Heart J ISSN: 0019-4832
Fig. 1Panel A: LV Voltage map in sinus rhythm of a patient in AP view showing areas of scar (denoted in red, with voltage of <0.5 mV) and normal myocardium (denoted in pink, with voltage of >1.5 mV). The areas between the scar and the normal myocardium are low voltage corridors containing abnormal electrograms. The fine white dots indicate the points mapped. Each abnormal electrogram is tagged with a different colour (blue: double potentials; yellow/orange: late potentials; white: fractionated signals; pink: continuous electrical activity) which are targets for ablation.
Panel B: shows a substrate map of the LV in LAO view where voltage thresholds have been adjusted to identify low voltage channels (multicoloured zones seen between pink areas) within the scar. The figure shows a late potential within a channel (blue tag and arrow) that was targeted for ablation.
Panel C: shows abnormal electrograms targeted for ablation. QRS complex in ECG lead V1, and corresponding LV electrogram on mapping catheter are shown. 1 to 3 are examples of isolated late potentials (ILPs), 1 is an ILP that is identified as a high frequency discrete potential separated from the ventricular electrogram by 50 msec, 2 shows an ILP which is fractionated,3 is a double-component or fractionated late potential that is formed by the almost fusion of two late potentials. 4 is a double potential having two component electrograms of low voltage separated by an isoelectric interval. 5shows low voltage pluricomponent signals without intervening isoelectric intervals that appears as continuous electrical activity (CEA).
Baseline characteristics.
| Characteristic | Range (Mean ± SD) |
|---|---|
| Patient population, (M/F) | 12 (10/2) |
| Age in years | 54–69 (61.38 ± 6.48) |
| LV ejection fraction (LVEF) (%) | 25–36 (31.92 ± 4.23) |
| LV End Diastolic Diameter (cm) | 5.7–7.3 (6.5 ± 0.8) |
| • Anterior wall MI (n = ) | 7 |
| • Inferior wall MI (n = ) | 3 |
| • Inferior + Posterior wall MI (n = ) | 2 |
| Medications (n = ) | |
| • Metoprolol | 12 |
| • Amiodarone | 12 |
| • Lignocaine | 09 |
| • Phenytoin | 01 |
| • Sotalol | 01 |
| Presentation (n = ) | |
| • Recurrent ICD shocks | 05 |
| • Recurrent VT | 07 |
| ICD shocks per patient (n = ) | 4–26 (9. ± 10) |
| External Shocks delivered per patient in ICU (n = ) | 23–98 (23 ± 28) |
Fig. 212 lead ECG recordings of one of the patients who had 4 different morphologies of VT (A to D) during procedure. The cycle length of the VTs was variable 260–300 ms (280.75 ± 19.38). All the VTs were hemodynamically unstable and unmappable.
Characteristics of Electroanatomic mapping and RFA (n = 8).
| Characteristic | Range (Mean ± SD) |
|---|---|
| Morphologies of spontaneous VTs per patient (n = ) | 2–5 (3 ± 2) |
| VT cycle length in milliseconds (ms) | 270–430 (350 ± 79) |
| LV points mapped by EAM (n = ) | 392–1017 (631 ± 212) |
| Scar area (sq cm) | 36.5–92.8 (70.04 ± 17.63) |
| Scar area as percentage of total LV mapped (%) | 18–34.8 (27.04 ± 6.20) |
| RF ablations delivered (n = ) | 49–95 (70 ± 20) |
| Procedure time in minutes | 217–409 (311.75 ± 61.38) |