RATIONALE: To evaluate the efficacy of radiofrequency ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation targeting complete late potential (LP) activity. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixty-four consecutive patients (pts) with recurrent VTs and coronary artery disease or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy were evaluated. Fifty patients (47 male; 66.2 ± 10.1 years) had LPs at electroanatomical mapping; 35 patients had at least 1 VT inducible at basal programmed stimulation. After substrate mapping, radiofrequency ablation was performed with the endpoint of all LPs abolition. LPs could not be abolished in 5 patients despite extensive ablation, in 1 patient because of localization near an apical thrombus, and in 2 patients because of possible phrenic nerve injury. At the end of procedure, prevention of VT inducibility was achieved in 25 of 35 patients (71.4%) with previously inducible VT; VT was still inducible in 5 of 8 patients with incomplete LP abolition; and in 5 of 42 patients (16.1%) with complete LP abolition (P < 0.01). After a follow-up of 13.4 ± 4.0 months, 10 patients (20.0%) had VT recurrences and one of them died after surgical VT ablation; VT recurrence was 9.5% in patients with LPs abolition (4/42 pts) and 75.0% (6/8 pts) in those with incomplete abolition [positive predictive value (PPV): 75%, negative predictive value (NPV): 90.4%, sensibility: 60.0%, and specificity: 95.0%, P < 0.0001); although it was 12.5% (5/40 pts) in patients without inducibility VT after the ablation, and 50% (5/10 pts) in those with inducible VT (PPV: 50%, NPV: 87.5%, sensitivity: 50.0%, and specificity: 87.5%, P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: LP abolition is an effective endpoint of VT ablation and its prognostic value compares favorably to that achieved by programmed electrical stimulation.
RATIONALE: To evaluate the efficacy of radiofrequency ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation targeting complete late potential (LP) activity. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixty-four consecutive patients (pts) with recurrent VTs and coronary artery disease or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy were evaluated. Fifty patients (47 male; 66.2 ± 10.1 years) had LPs at electroanatomical mapping; 35 patients had at least 1 VT inducible at basal programmed stimulation. After substrate mapping, radiofrequency ablation was performed with the endpoint of all LPs abolition. LPs could not be abolished in 5 patients despite extensive ablation, in 1 patient because of localization near an apical thrombus, and in 2 patients because of possible phrenic nerve injury. At the end of procedure, prevention of VT inducibility was achieved in 25 of 35 patients (71.4%) with previously inducible VT; VT was still inducible in 5 of 8 patients with incomplete LP abolition; and in 5 of 42 patients (16.1%) with complete LP abolition (P < 0.01). After a follow-up of 13.4 ± 4.0 months, 10 patients (20.0%) had VT recurrences and one of them died after surgical VT ablation; VT recurrence was 9.5% in patients with LPs abolition (4/42 pts) and 75.0% (6/8 pts) in those with incomplete abolition [positive predictive value (PPV): 75%, negative predictive value (NPV): 90.4%, sensibility: 60.0%, and specificity: 95.0%, P < 0.0001); although it was 12.5% (5/40 pts) in patients without inducibility VT after the ablation, and 50% (5/10 pts) in those with inducible VT (PPV: 50%, NPV: 87.5%, sensitivity: 50.0%, and specificity: 87.5%, P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS:LP abolition is an effective endpoint of VT ablation and its prognostic value compares favorably to that achieved by programmed electrical stimulation.
Authors: Edmond M Cronin; Frank M Bogun; Philippe Maury; Petr Peichl; Minglong Chen; Narayanan Namboodiri; Luis Aguinaga; Luiz Roberto Leite; Sana M Al-Khatib; Elad Anter; Antonio Berruezo; David J Callans; Mina K Chung; Phillip Cuculich; Andre d'Avila; Barbara J Deal; Paolo Della Bella; Thomas Deneke; Timm-Michael Dickfeld; Claudio Hadid; Haris M Haqqani; G Neal Kay; Rakesh Latchamsetty; Francis Marchlinski; John M Miller; Akihiko Nogami; Akash R Patel; Rajeev Kumar Pathak; Luis C Saenz Morales; Pasquale Santangeli; John L Sapp; Andrea Sarkozy; Kyoko Soejima; William G Stevenson; Usha B Tedrow; Wendy S Tzou; Niraj Varma; Katja Zeppenfeld Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2020-10 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Sean D Pokorney; Daniel J Friedman; Hugh Calkins; David J Callans; Emile G Daoud; Paolo Della-Bella; Kevin P Jackson; Kalyanam Shivkumar; Samir Saba; John Sapp; William G Stevenson; Sana M Al-Khatib Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2016-04-02 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Toby Rogers; Srijoy Mahapatra; Steven Kim; Michael A Eckhaus; William H Schenke; Jonathan R Mazal; Adrienne Campbell-Washburn; Merdim Sonmez; Anthony Z Faranesh; Kanishka Ratnayaka; Robert J Lederman Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2016-04
Authors: Pasquale Vergara; Wendy S Tzou; Roderick Tung; Chiara Brombin; Alessandro Nonis; Marmar Vaseghi; David S Frankel; Luigi Di Biase; Usha Tedrow; Nilesh Mathuria; Shiro Nakahara; Venkat Tholakanahalli; T Jared Bunch; J Peter Weiss; Timm Dickfeld; Dhanunjaya Lakireddy; J David Burkhardt; Pasquale Santangeli; David Callans; Andrea Natale; Francis Marchlinski; William G Stevenson; Kalyanam Shivkumar; William H Sauer; Paolo Della Bella Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2018-12
Authors: Roderick Tung; Marmar Vaseghi; David S Frankel; Pasquale Vergara; Luigi Di Biase; Koichi Nagashima; Ricky Yu; Sitaram Vangala; Chi-Hong Tseng; Eue-Keun Choi; Shaan Khurshid; Mehul Patel; Nilesh Mathuria; Shiro Nakahara; Wendy S Tzou; William H Sauer; Kairav Vakil; Usha Tedrow; J David Burkhardt; Venkatakrishna N Tholakanahalli; Anastasios Saliaris; Timm Dickfeld; J Peter Weiss; T Jared Bunch; Madhu Reddy; Arun Kanmanthareddy; David J Callans; Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy; Andrea Natale; Francis Marchlinski; William G Stevenson; Paolo Della Bella; Kalyanam Shivkumar Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2015-05-30 Impact factor: 6.343