Literature DB >> 29714681

Prevalence and Distribution of Atherosclerosis in a Low- to Intermediate-Risk Population: Assessment with Whole-Body MR Angiography.

Matthew A Lambert1, Jonathan R Weir-McCall1, Marco Salsano1, Stephen J Gandy1, Daniel Levin1, Ian Cavin1, Roberta Littleford1, Jennifer A MacFarlane1, Shona Z Matthew1, Richard S Nicholas1, Allan D Struthers1, Frank Sullivan1, Shelley A Henderson1, Richard D White1, Jill J F Belch1, J Graeme Houston1.   

Abstract

Purpose To quantify the burden and distribution of asymptomatic atherosclerosis in a population with a low to intermediate risk of cardiovascular disease. Materials and Methods Between June 2008 and February 2013, 1528 participants with 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease less than 20% were prospectively enrolled. They underwent whole-body magnetic resonance (MR) angiography at 3.0 T by using a two-injection, four-station acquisition technique. Thirty-one arterial segments were scored according to maximum stenosis. Scores were summed and normalized for the number of assessable arterial segments to provide a standardized atheroma score (SAS). Multiple linear regression was performed to assess effects of risk factors on atheroma burden. Results A total of 1513 participants (577 [37.9%] men; median age, 53.5 years; range, 40-83 years) completed the study protocol. Among 46 903 potentially analyzable segments, 46 601 (99.4%) were interpretable. Among these, 2468 segments (5%) demonstrated stenoses, of which 1649 (3.5%) showed stenosis less than 50% and 484 (1.0%) showed stenosis greater than or equal to 50%. Vascular stenoses were distributed throughout the body with no localized distribution. Seven hundred forty-seven (49.4%) participants had at least one stenotic vessel, and 408 (27.0%) participants had multiple stenotic vessels. At multivariable linear regression, SAS correlated with age (B = 3.4; 95% confidence interval: 2.61, 4.20), heart rate (B = 1.23; 95% confidence interval: 0.51, 1.95), systolic blood pressure (B = 0.02; 95% confidence interval: 0.01, 0.03), smoking status (B = 0.79; 95% confidence interval: 0.44, 1.15), and socioeconomic status (B = -0.06; 95% confidence interval: -0.10, -0.02) (P < .01 for all). Conclusion Whole-body MR angiography identifies early vascular disease at a population level. Although disease prevalence is low on a per-vessel level, vascular disease is common on a per-participant level, even in this low- to intermediate-risk cohort. © RSNA, 2018 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29714681      PMCID: PMC5979784          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2018171609

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   29.146


  30 in total

1.  Diabetes mellitus: long-term prognostic value of whole-body MR imaging for the occurrence of cardiac and cerebrovascular events.

Authors:  Fabian Bamberg; Klaus G Parhofer; Elena Lochner; Roy P Marcus; Daniel Theisen; Hannes M Findeisen; Udo Hoffmann; Stefan O Schönberg; Christopher L Schlett; Maximilian F Reiser; Sabine Weckbach
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Whole-body three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography with parallel imaging techniques on a multichannel MR system for the detection of various systemic arterial diseases.

Authors:  Jiang Lin; Bin Chen; Jian-Hua Wang; Meng-Su Zeng; Yi-Xiang Wang
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2006-11-27       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Whole-body MR angiography using a novel 32-receiving-channel MR system with surface coil technology: first clinical experience.

Authors:  Michael Fenchel; Martin Requardt; Katrin Tomaschko; Ulrich Kramer; Norbert I Stauder; Thomas Naegele; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Claus D Claussen; Stephan Miller
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Whole body MR angiography screening.

Authors:  Stefan G Ruehm; Susanne C Goehde; Mathias Goyen
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Comparative determinants of 4-year cardiovascular event rates in stable outpatients at risk of or with atherothrombosis.

Authors:  Deepak L Bhatt; Kim A Eagle; E Magnus Ohman; Alan T Hirsch; Shinya Goto; Elizabeth M Mahoney; Peter W F Wilson; Mark J Alberts; Ralph D'Agostino; Chiau-Suong Liau; Jean-Louis Mas; Joachim Röther; Sidney C Smith; Geneviève Salette; Charles F Contant; Joseph M Massaro; Ph Gabriel Steg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Technical assessment of whole body angiography and cardiac function within a single MRI examination.

Authors:  S J Gandy; M Lambert; J J F Belch; I D Cavin; E Crowe; R Littleford; J A Macfarlane; S Z Matthew; P Martin; R S Nicholas; A D Struthers; F Sullivan; S A Waugh; R D White; J R Weir-McCall; J G Houston
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 2.350

7.  Prediction of coronary artery disease by a systemic atherosclerosis score index derived from whole-body MR angiography.

Authors:  Stephanie Lehrke; Benjamin Egenlauf; Henning Steen; Dirk Lossnitzer; Grigorius Korosoglou; Constanze Merten; Boris T Ivandic; Evangelos Giannitsis; Hugo A Katus
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 5.364

8.  Imaging in population science: cardiovascular magnetic resonance in 100,000 participants of UK Biobank - rationale, challenges and approaches.

Authors:  Steffen E Petersen; Paul M Matthews; Fabian Bamberg; David A Bluemke; Jane M Francis; Matthias G Friedrich; Paul Leeson; Eike Nagel; Sven Plein; Frank E Rademakers; Alistair A Young; Steve Garratt; Tim Peakman; Jonathan Sellors; Rory Collins; Stefan Neubauer
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 5.364

9.  Cohort comparison study of cardiac disease and atherosclerotic burden in type 2 diabetic adults using whole body cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Suzanne L Duce; Jonathan R Weir-McCall; Stephen J Gandy; Shona Z Matthew; Deirdre B Cassidy; Lynne McCormick; Petra Rauchhaus; Helen Looker; Helen M Colhoun; J Graeme Houston
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 9.951

10.  Prevalence of unrecognized myocardial infarction in a low-intermediate risk asymptomatic cohort and its relation to systemic atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Jonathan R Weir-McCall; Kerrie Fitzgerald; Carla J Papagiorcopulo; Stephen J Gandy; Matthew Lambert; Jill J F Belch; Ian Cavin; Roberta Littleford; Jennifer A Macfarlane; Shona Z Matthew; R Stephen Nicholas; Allan D Struthers; Frank M Sullivan; Shelley A Waugh; Richard D White; J Graeme Houston
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 6.875

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Diversity of Lipid Function in Atherogenesis: A Focus on Endothelial Mechanobiology.

Authors:  Stanislav Kotlyarov
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 5.923

2.  Differential Biological Effects of Dietary Lipids and Irradiation on the Aorta, Aortic Valve, and the Mitral Valve.

Authors:  Nathalie Donis; Zheshen Jiang; Céline D'Emal; Alexia Hulin; Margaux Debuisson; Raluca Dulgheru; Mai-Linh Nguyen; Adriana Postolache; François Lallemand; Philippe Coucke; Philippe Martinive; Marielle Herzog; Dorian Pamart; Jason Terrell; Joel Pincemail; Pierre Drion; Philippe Delvenne; Alain Nchimi; Patrizio Lancellotti; Cécile Oury
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-02-28

3.  Association between multi-site atherosclerotic plaques and systemic arteriosclerosis: results from the BEST study (Beijing Vascular Disease Patients Evaluation Study).

Authors:  Huan Liu; Jinbo Liu; Wei Huang; Hongwei Zhao; Na Zhao; Hongyu Wang
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 2.062

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.