David J Foreman1, Eric T Dziekonski2, Scott A McLuckey3. 1. Department of Chemistry, Purdue University, 560 Oval Drive, West Lafayette, IN, 47907-2084, USA. 2. SCIEX, Concord, ON, L4K 4V8, Canada. 3. Department of Chemistry, Purdue University, 560 Oval Drive, West Lafayette, IN, 47907-2084, USA. mcluckey@purdue.edu.
Abstract
A new approach for the identification of intact proteins has been developed that relies on the generation of relatively few abundant products from specific cleavage sites. This strategy is intended to complement standard approaches that seek to generate many fragments relatively non-selectively. Specifically, this strategy seeks to maximize selective cleavage at aspartic acid and proline residues via collisional activation of precursor ions formed via electrospray ionization (ESI) under denaturing conditions. A statistical analysis of the SWISS-PROT database was used to predict the number of arginine residues for a given intact protein mass and predict a m/z range where the protein carries a similar charge to the number of arginine residues thereby enhancing cleavage at aspartic acid residues by limiting proton mobility. Cleavage at aspartic acid residues is predicted to be most favorable in the m/z range of 1500-2500, a range higher than that normally generated by ESI at low pH. Gas-phase proton transfer ion/ion reactions are therefore used for precursor ion concentration from relatively high charge states followed by ion isolation and subsequent generation of precursor ions within the optimal m/z range via a second proton transfer reaction step. It is shown that the majority of product ion abundance is concentrated into cleavages C-terminal to aspartic acid residues and N-terminal to proline residues for ions generated by this process. Implementation of a scoring system that weights both ion fragment type and ion fragment area demonstrated identification of standard proteins, ranging in mass from 8.5 to 29.0 kDa. Graphical Abstract ᅟ.
A new approach for the identification of intn class="Chemical">act proteins has been developed that relies on the generation of relatively few abundant products from specific cleavage sites. This strategy is intended to complement standard approaches that seek to generate many fragments relatively non-selectively. Specifically, this strategy seeks to maximize selective cleavage at aspartic acid and proline residues via collisional activation of precursor ions formed via electrospray ionization (ESI) under denaturing conditions. A statistical analysis of the SWISS-PROT database was used to predict the number of arginine residues for a given intact protein mass and predict a m/z range where the protein carries a similar charge to the number of arginine residues thereby enhancing cleavage at aspartic acid residues by limiting proton mobility. Cleavage at aspartic acid residues is predicted to be most favorable in the m/z range of 1500-2500, a range higher than that normally generated by ESI at low pH. Gas-phase proton transfer ion/ion reactions are therefore used for precursor ion concentration from relatively high charge states followed by ion isolation and subsequent generation of precursor ions within the optimal m/z range via a second proton transfer reaction step. It is shown that the majority of product ion abundance is concentrated into cleavages C-terminal to aspartic acid residues and N-terminal to proline residues for ions generated by this process. Implementation of a scoring system that weights both ion fragment type and ion fragment area demonstrated identification of standard proteins, ranging in mass from 8.5 to 29.0 kDa. Graphical Abstract ᅟ.
Entities:
Keywords:
Intact protein identification; Ion/ion reactions; Selective fragmentation; Top-down
Authors: Yu Xia; Paul A Chrisman; David E Erickson; Jian Liu; Xiaorong Liang; Frank A Londry; Min J Yang; Scott A McLuckey Journal: Anal Chem Date: 2006-06-15 Impact factor: 6.986
Authors: Leah V Schaffer; Michael R Shortreed; Anthony J Cesnik; Brian L Frey; Stefan K Solntsev; Mark Scalf; Lloyd M Smith Journal: Anal Chem Date: 2017-12-22 Impact factor: 6.986
Authors: Ashley N Ives; Taojunfeng Su; Kenneth R Durbin; Bryan P Early; Henrique Dos Santos Seckler; Ryan T Fellers; Richard D LeDuc; Luis F Schachner; Steven M Patrie; Neil L Kelleher Journal: J Am Soc Mass Spectrom Date: 2020-06-24 Impact factor: 3.109
Authors: Leah V Schaffer; Robert J Millikin; Rachel M Miller; Lissa C Anderson; Ryan T Fellers; Ying Ge; Neil L Kelleher; Richard D LeDuc; Xiaowen Liu; Samuel H Payne; Liangliang Sun; Paul M Thomas; Trisha Tucholski; Zhe Wang; Si Wu; Zhijie Wu; Dahang Yu; Michael R Shortreed; Lloyd M Smith Journal: Proteomics Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 3.984
Authors: Scott A Ugrin; A Michelle English; John E P Syka; Dina L Bai; Lissa C Anderson; Jeffrey Shabanowitz; Donald F Hunt Journal: J Am Soc Mass Spectrom Date: 2019-08-07 Impact factor: 3.109