Literature DB >> 29712637

Efficacy of non-fovea-sparing ILM peeling for symptomatic myopic foveoschisis with and without macular hole.

Amer Hamad Al-Badawi1, Mohamad Amr Salah Eddin Abdelhakim2, Tamer Ahmed Macky1, Hassan Aly Mortada1.   

Abstract

AIM: To study anatomical and visual outcomes of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with non-fovea-sparing (entire) internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling in eyes with myopic foveoschisis (MF).
METHODS: Prospective interventional case series of eyes undergoing PPV with entire ILM peeling for symptomatic MF. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Preoperative spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) epiretinal membrane, anomalous posterior vitreous detachment, vitreoschisis and postoperative changes in SD-OCT central foveal thickness (CFT), ellipsoid zone defect, foveal detachment (FD), macular hole (MH) diameter (if present) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR).
RESULTS: This study included 21 eyes (21 patients) with mean age 60.4±13.1, 15 females (71.4%). All patients achieved complete postoperative reattachment by SD-OCT (no FD) 6 months post vitrectomy, with no iatrogenic intraoperative or postoperative MH, and with significant improvement in final BCVA from 1.6±0.30 to1.0±0.2 logMAR, and in CFT from 918.2±311.4 to182.3±33.1 µm. Patients were subdivided into subgroup A: 11 eyes without MH; and subgroup B: 10 eyes with MH, the latter had significant improvement in MH diameter (p=0.005). Preoperative BCVA was a significant risk factor for visual gain, while preoperative FD and CFT were significant for CFT change.
CONCLUSION: Vitrectomy with non-fovea-sparing (entire) ILM peeling resulted in a significant functional and anatomical improvement in eyes with MF with/without MH with no reported complications. Results are comparable to fovea-sparing ILM peeling. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Myopic foveoschisis; SD-OCT; foveal detachment; myopic macular hole; non-fovea sparing ILM peeling

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29712637     DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-311775

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  4 in total

1.  Morphologic and functional outcomes of different optical coherence tomography patterns of myopic foveoschisis after vitrectomy and inner limiting membrane peeling.

Authors:  Giancarlo Sborgia; Francesco Boscia; Alfredo Niro; Ermete Giancipoli; Giuseppe D'Amico Ricci; Alessandra Sborgia; Luigi Sborgia; Nicola Recchimurzo; Mario R Romano; Giuseppe Addabbo; Giovanni Alessio
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling and gas tamponade for myopic foveoschisis.

Authors:  Jingyi Zhang; Yanping Yu; Dongshu Dai; Wu Liu
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 2.086

3.  FOVEA-SPARING VERSUS COMPLETE INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE PEELING IN VITRECTOMY FOR VITREOMACULAR INTERFACE DISEASES: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yuelin Wang; Xinyu Zhao; Wenfei Zhang; Jingyuan Yang; Youxin Chen
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 4.256

4.  Vitrectomy with or without internal limiting membrane peeling for myopic foveoschisis.

Authors:  Junmin Gui; Ling Ai; Ting Huang
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 2.209

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.