| Literature DB >> 32131776 |
Junmin Gui1, Ling Ai2, Ting Huang2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the anatomical and visual outcomes of vitrectomy with or without internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling for symptomatic myopic foveoschisis (MF).Entities:
Keywords: Indocyanine green; Internal limiting membrane; Myopic foveoschisis; Vitrectomy
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32131776 PMCID: PMC7055105 DOI: 10.1186/s12886-020-01354-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Ophthalmol ISSN: 1471-2415 Impact factor: 2.209
Clinical characteristics of patients (pre-operative)
| Parameter | Cohort (retrospectively grouped) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| No ILMP ( | ILMP ( | ||
| 63.2 ± 7.4 | 61.8 ± 7.5 | 0.676 | |
| −13.1 ± 8.2 | −11.1 ± 4.9 | 0.388 | |
| 4/11 (36.3%) | 11/21 (52.3%) | 0.472 | |
| 4/11 (36.4%) | 4/21 (19.0%) | 0.397 | |
| 8/11(72.7%) | 18/21(85.7%) | 0.390 | |
| 16.6 ± 11.2 | 18.7 ± 13.9 | 0.658 | |
Continuous variables are given as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Binary variables are given as fraction (percentage in brackets)
*P-value of there being a difference between the no-ILMP and ILMP cohort (Mann–Whitney U-test for continuous variables and Chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test for binary variables)
Anatomical and visual outcomes of vitrectomy
| Parameter | Cohort (retrospectively grouped) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| No ILMP ( | ILMP ( | ||
| Preoperative | 1.27 ± 0.63 | 1.25 ± 0.51 | 0.904* |
| Postoperative (final) | 0.73 ± 0.55 | 0.98 ± 0.57 | 0.340* |
| 0.012 | 0.143 | – | |
| 0.072§ | |||
| Improved | 10 (90.9%) | 12 (57.1%) | – |
| Unchanged | 0 (0.0%) | 4 (19.1%) | |
| Worsened | 1 (9.1%) | 5 (23.8%) | – |
| Preoperative | 469 ± 203 | 495 ± 178 | 0.592* |
| Postoperative | 253 ± 56 | 244 ± 63 | 0.111* |
| 0.003 | < 0.001 | – | |
| Full thickness macular hole | 0 | 1 (5.6%) | |
| Retinal detachment | 0 | 2 (11.1%) | |
Numerical variables are given as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Categorical variables are given as count (percentage in brackets)
*, P-value between no-ILMP and ILMP cohort (Mann-Whitney U-test). †, p-value between preoperative and postoperative values (Wilcoxon paired signed-rank test). ‡ An improvement or worsening of visual acuity was defined as a change 0.2 logMAR units. §, p-value between Non-peel and ILM peel group (Kruskal–Wallis test)
Fig. 1OCT imaging of myopic foveoschisis (MF) before and after vitrectomy without ILM peeling. (a) Preoperative image of the eye of a 72-year-old female with MF; AXL 26.1 mm and BCVA 0.2. (b) Two months postoperatively, MF partially resolved. (c) 40 months postoperatively, MF completely resolved; BCVA improved to 0.6. (d) Preoperative image of the eye of a 51-year-old female with MF, a macular hole and foveal detachment; AXL 32.2 mm, BCVA 0.05. (e) Two months postoperatively, foveal detachment partially resolved. (f) 19 months postoperatively, MF completely resolved; BCVA improved to 0.2 OCT, optical coherence tomography; AXL, axial length; BCVA, best corrected visual acuity.
Fig. 2OCT imaging of myopic foveoschisis (MF) before and after vitrectomy with ILM peeling. (a) Preoperative image of the eye of a 51-year-old female with MF, a macular hole and foveal detachment; AXL 26.0 mm and BCVA CF/50 cm. (b) Two months postoperatively, the macular hole was closed. (c) Twelve months postoperatively, the foveal contour was stable; BCVA remained unchanged. (d) Preoperative image of the eye of a 64-year-old female with foveal detachment; AXL 26.3 mm and BCVA CF/15 cm. (e) Two month postoperatively, foveal detachment unchanged. (f) Nine months postoperatively, schisis and foveal detachment resolved completely; BCVA improved to 0.12. OCT, optical coherence tomography; AXL, axial length; BCVA, best corrected visual acuity; CF, counting finger