| Literature DB >> 29710842 |
Maha S Almutairi1, Azza S Zakaria2, Reem I Al-Wabli3, I Hubert Joe4, Ali S Abdelhameed5, Mohamed I Attia6,7.
Abstract
N-(2-{[2-(1H-Indol-2-ylcarbonyl)hydrazinyl](oxo)acetyl}phenyl)acetamides (5a⁻h) and N-[2-(2-{[2-(acetylamino)phenyl](oxo)acetyl}hydrazinyl)-2-oxoethyl]-1H-indole-2-carboxamides (5i⁻l) were synthesized and characterized with different analytical tools. N-Acetylisatines 4a⁻d were subjected to ring opening at their C2 carbons with the aid of different indole-bearing hydrazides 3a,b and 7 to afford the respective glyoxylamides 5a⁻l. The antimicrobial activity of the target compounds 5a⁻l was assessed with the aid of Diameter of the Inhibition Zone (DIZ) and Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) assays against a panel of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and certain fungal strains. The antimicrobial screening revealed that Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Candida albicans are the most sensitive microorganisms towards the synthesized compounds 5a⁻l. In addition, compounds 5c and 5h emerged as the most active congeners towards Staphylococcus aureus and Candida albicans, respectively. Molecular docking studies revealed the possible binding mode of compounds 5c and 5h to their target proteins.Entities:
Keywords: N-Acetylisatins; antimicrobial; glyoxylamides; indole; ring opening
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29710842 PMCID: PMC6102541 DOI: 10.3390/molecules23051043
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Scheme 1Synthesis of the target compounds 5a–h. Reagents and conditions: (i) Methanol, drops of H2SO4, reflux, 4 h; (ii) Methanol, H2N-NH2.H2O, reflux, 2 h; and (iii) Acetonitrile, reflux 2 h.
Scheme 2Synthesis of the target compounds 5i–l. Reagents and conditions: (i) Tetrahydrofuran, ethyl glycinate hydrochloride, carbonyldiimidazole, rt, 18 h; (ii) Methanol, H2N-NH2.H2O, reflux, 2 h; and (iii) Acetonitrile, reflux 2 h.
Diameter of the Inhibition Zone (DIZ) of the title compounds 5a–l, AMP, and FLC against Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria, and fungi.
| Compound No. | DIZ in mm ± S.D.* | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strain | ||||||||||||
| Gram-Positive Bacteria | Gram-Negative Bacteria | Fungi | ||||||||||
| MRSA | ||||||||||||
| 9 ± 0.0 | 9 ± 1.0 | 9 ± 0.0 | 19 ± 0.0 | 13 ± 0.9 | −ve | −ve | 13 ± 0.4 | 9 ± 0.0 | 8 ± 0.0 | 11 ± 0.4 | 15 ± 0.1 | |
| 15 ± 1.0 | 9 ± 0.0 | −ve | 19 ± 0.0 | 19 ± 1.1 | 11 ± 0.6 | −ve | 14 ± 0.3 | 9 ± 0.0 | 8 ± 0.0 | 10 ± 0.3 | 15 ± 0.7 | |
| 15 ± 0.8 | 9 ± 0.0 | 11 ± 0.4 | 21 ± 0.7 | 13 ± 0.3 | −ve | −ve | 9 ± 0.0 | 9 ± 0.0 | 17 ± 0.4 | 8 ± 0.0 | 18 ± 0.3 | |
| 16 ± 0.2 | 18 ± 1.3 | 11 ± 0.0 | 14 ± 0.3 | 14 ± 0.8 | 11 ± 0.3 | −ve | 11 ± 0.3 | 9 ± 0.0 | 8 ± 0.0 | 14 ± 0.2 | 8 ± 0.0 | |
| 11 ± 0.8 | 11 ± 0.0 | −ve | −ve | 13 ± 0.44 | −ve | −ve | 9 ± 0.2 | 9 ± 0.0 | 15 ± 0.7 | 14 ± 1.1 | 9 ± 0.5 | |
| 9 ± 0.0 | 11 ± 0.6 | 13 ± 1.6 | 16 ± 0.5 | 14 ± 0.0 | −ve | −ve | 18 ± 0.5 | 15 ± 0.7 | 8 ± 0.0 | 18 ± 0.0 | 15 ± 1.6 | |
| 9 ± 0.4 | 9 ± 0.5 | 11 ± 0.0 | 14 ± 0.4 | 15 ± 1.0 | −ve | −ve | 9 ± 0.0 | 9 ± 0.0 | 17 ± 0.1 | 18 ± 0.0 | 14 ± 1.0 | |
| 22 ± 1.6 | 14 ± 0.3 | 11 ± 0.5 | 14 ± 0.4 | 14 ± 0.3 | −ve | 11 ± 0.7 | 11 ± 0.6 | 9 ± 0.0 | 11 ± 0.1 | 25 ± 1.6 | 16 ± 0.5 | |
| 13 ± 0.6 | 12 ± 0.9 | −ve | 19 ± 0.0 | 17 ± 0.6 | −ve | −ve | 14 ± 0.5 | 16 ± 0.2 | 8 ± 0.0 | 11 ± 0.2 | 18 ± 1.2 | |
| 12 ± 0.6 | 11 ± 0.2 | −ve | 9 ± 0.2 | 13 ± 0.2 | −ve | 11 ± 0.2 | 9 ± 0.7 | 9 ± 0.0 | 16 ± 0.5 | 13 ± 0.3 | 14 ± 0.5 | |
| 14 ± 0.4 | 11 ± 0.5 | −ve | 9 ± 0.0 | 14 ± 0.0 | −ve | −ve | 9 ± 0.6 | 9 ± 0.1 | 8 ± 0.0 | 13 ± 1.0 | 16 ± 0.4 | |
| 15 ± 0.4 | 9 ± 0.8 | −ve | 9 ± 0.0 | 14 ± 0.0 | −ve | −ve | 12 ± 0.8 | 9 ± 0.0 | 8 ± 0.0 | 15 ± 0.7 | 14 ± 0.5 | |
| 30 ± 0.0 | −ve | 36 ± 0.7 | −ve | 45 ± 1.0 | 32 ± 0.4 | 18 ± 0.4 | 35 ± 1.0 | 30 ± 0.5 | ND | ND | ND | |
| ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 21 ± 0.5 | 16 ± 0.8 | 15 ± 0.0 | |
Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MICs) of the title compounds 5a–l, AMP, and FLC against Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria, and fungi.
| MIC Values (μg/mL) | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compound No. | Strain Name | ||||||||||||
| Gram-Positive Bacteria | Gram-Negative Bacteria | Fungi | |||||||||||
| MRSA | |||||||||||||
| 500 | 500 | 500 | 125 | 125 | 500 | 250 | 125 | 500 | 250 | 250 | 125 | ||
| 125 | 500 | 500 | 62.5 | 125 | 500 | 250 | 250 | 250 | 62.5 | 250 | 250 | ||
| 250 | 500 | 500 | 3.9 | 125 | 500 | 250 | 125 | 125 | 250 | 250 | 250 | ||
| 250 | 250 | >1000 | 31.25 | 125 | 500 | 250 | 62.5 | 250 | 15.6 | 62.5 | 62.5 | ||
| 250 | 500 | 500 | 500 | 125 | 500 | 250 | 250 | 250 | 250 | 125 | 125 | ||
| 250 | 500 | 500 | 250 | 125 | 500 | 250 | 250 | 500 | 250 | 125 | 250 | ||
| 250 | 500 | 500 | 250 | 125 | 500 | 250 | 250 | 250 | 125 | 31.25 | 125 | ||
| 62.5 | 125 | 500 | 250 | 250 | 500 | 250 | 250 | 500 | 31.25 | 7.8 | 62.5 | ||
| 500 | 1000 | 500 | 62.5 | 62.5 | 500 | 250 | 125 | 125 | 125 | 250 | 250 | ||
| 500 | 500 | 500 | 500 | 125 | 500 | 250 | 125 | 500 | 125 | 250 | 250 | ||
| 500 | 500 | 500 | 500 | 62.5 | 500 | 1000 | 125 | 250 | 250 | 250 | 250 | ||
| 250 | 1000 | 500 | 500 | 125 | 250 | 125 | 125 | 250 | 250 | 250 | 250 | ||
| 15.6 | >1000 | <7.8 | >1000 | <7.8 | 250 | 500 | 3.9 | 1000 | ND | ND | ND | ||
| ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 15.6 | 31.25 | 250 | ||
Binding energies and inhibition constants results of compounds 5c and 5h with their target proteins.
| Protein ID | Binding | Estimated Inhibition Constant ( | Bounded Residues |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4DH6 | –7.88 | 1.67 | THR232, GLY230 and PRO70 |
| 1EA1 | –7.28 | 4.63 | ARG326, HIS392, GLN72, VAL395, and ASN102 |
Figure 1Hydrogen bonding projection of protein-ligand interactions and binding pose for compound 5c (left) and compound 5h (right).
| H | H | |
| H | Br | |
| H | Cl | |
| H | F | |
| OCH3 | H | |
| OCH3 | Br | |
| OCH3 | Cl | |
| OCH3 | F |
| H | H | |
| H | Br | |
| H | Cl | |
| H | F |