Hillary J Mull1,2, Laura A Graham3,4, Melanie S Morris3,4, Amy K Rosen1,2, Joshua S Richman3,4, Jeffery Whittle5,6, Edith Burns5,6, Todd H Wagner7,8, Laurel A Copeland9,10,11, Tyler Wahl3,4, Caroline Jones3,4, Robert H Hollis3,4, Kamal M F Itani1,2,12, Mary T Hawn7,8. 1. Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts. 2. Department of Surgery, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts. 3. Birmingham and Tuscaloosa Health Services Research and Development Unit, Birmingham VA Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama. 4. Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham. 5. Medicine Division, Milwaukee VA Medical Center, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. 6. Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee. 7. VA Palo Alto Medical Center, Palo Alto, California. 8. Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California. 9. VA Central Western Massachusetts Healthcare System, Leeds. 10. University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester. 11. Baylor Scott & White Health, Center for Applied Health Research, Temple, Texas. 12. Harvard University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
Importance: Postoperative readmission data are used to measure hospital performance, yet the extent to which these readmissions reflect surgical quality is unknown. Objective: To establish expert consensus on whether reasons for postoperative readmission are associated with the quality of surgery in the index admission. Design, Setting, and Participants: In a modified Delphi process, a panel of 14 experts in medical and surgical readmissions comprising physicians and nonphysicians from Veterans Affairs (VA) and private-sector institutions reviewed 30-day postoperative readmissions from fiscal years 2008 through 2014 associated with inpatient surgical procedures performed at a VA medical center between October 1, 2007, and September 30, 2014. The consensus process was conducted from January through May 2017. Reasons for readmission were grouped into categories based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) diagnosis codes. Panelists were given the proportion of readmissions coded by each reason and median (interquartile range) days to readmission. They answered the question, "Does the readmission reason reflect possible surgical quality of care problems in the index admission?" on a scale of 1 (never related) to 5 (directly related) in 3 rounds of consensus building. The consensus process was completed in May 2017 and data were analyzed in June 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures: Consensus on proportion of ICD-9-coded readmission reasons that reflected quality of surgical procedure. Results: In 3 Delphi rounds, the 14 panelists achieved consensus on 50 reasons for readmission; 12 panelists also completed group telephone calls between rounds 1 and 2. Readmissions with diagnoses of infection, sepsis, pneumonia, hemorrhage/hematoma, anemia, ostomy complications, acute renal failure, fluid/electrolyte disorders, or venous thromboembolism were considered associated with surgical quality and accounted for 25 521 of 39 664 readmissions (64% of readmissions; 7.5% of 340 858 index surgical procedures). The proportion of readmissions considered to be not associated with surgical quality varied by procedure, ranging from to 21% (613 of 2331) of readmissions after lower-extremity amputations to 47% (745 of 1598) of readmissions after cholecystectomy. Conclusions and Relevance: One-third of postoperative readmissions are unlikely to reflect problems with surgical quality. Future studies should test whether restricting readmissions to those with specific ICD-9 codes might yield a more useful quality measure.
Importance: Postoperative readmission data are used to measure hospital performance, yet the extent to which these readmissions reflect surgical quality is unknown. Objective: To establish expert consensus on whether reasons for postoperative readmission are associated with the quality of surgery in the index admission. Design, Setting, and Participants: In a modified Delphi process, a panel of 14 experts in medical and surgical readmissions comprising physicians and nonphysicians from Veterans Affairs (VA) and private-sector institutions reviewed 30-day postoperative readmissions from fiscal years 2008 through 2014 associated with inpatient surgical procedures performed at a VA medical center between October 1, 2007, and September 30, 2014. The consensus process was conducted from January through May 2017. Reasons for readmission were grouped into categories based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) diagnosis codes. Panelists were given the proportion of readmissions coded by each reason and median (interquartile range) days to readmission. They answered the question, "Does the readmission reason reflect possible surgical quality of care problems in the index admission?" on a scale of 1 (never related) to 5 (directly related) in 3 rounds of consensus building. The consensus process was completed in May 2017 and data were analyzed in June 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures: Consensus on proportion of ICD-9-coded readmission reasons that reflected quality of surgical procedure. Results: In 3 Delphi rounds, the 14 panelists achieved consensus on 50 reasons for readmission; 12 panelists also completed group telephone calls between rounds 1 and 2. Readmissions with diagnoses of infection, sepsis, pneumonia, hemorrhage/hematoma, anemia, ostomy complications, acute renal failure, fluid/electrolyte disorders, or venous thromboembolism were considered associated with surgical quality and accounted for 25 521 of 39 664 readmissions (64% of readmissions; 7.5% of 340 858 index surgical procedures). The proportion of readmissions considered to be not associated with surgical quality varied by procedure, ranging from to 21% (613 of 2331) of readmissions after lower-extremity amputations to 47% (745 of 1598) of readmissions after cholecystectomy. Conclusions and Relevance: One-third of postoperative readmissions are unlikely to reflect problems with surgical quality. Future studies should test whether restricting readmissions to those with specific ICD-9 codes might yield a more useful quality measure.
Authors: Brian J Daley; William Cecil; P Chris Clarke; Joseph B Cofer; Oscar D Guillamondegui Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2015-01-09 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Amy K Rosen; Qi Chen; Marlena H Shin; William O'Brien; Michael Shwartz; Hillary J Mull; Marisa Cevasco; Ann M Borzecki Journal: Med Care Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Melanie S Morris; Laura A Graham; Joshua S Richman; Robert H Hollis; Caroline E Jones; Tyler Wahl; Kamal M F Itani; Hillary J Mull; Amy K Rosen; Laurel Copeland; Edith Burns; Gordon Telford; Jeffery Whittle; Mark Wilson; Sara J Knight; Mary T Hawn Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Ann M Borzecki; Qi Chen; Hillary J Mull; Michael Shwartz; Deepak L Bhatt; Amresh Hanchate; Amy K Rosen Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2016-09-06
Authors: William J O'Brien; Qi Chen; Hillary J Mull; Michael Shwartz; Ann M Borzecki; Amresh Hanchate; Amy K Rosen Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2014-07-15 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Elizabeth M Hechenbleikner; Martin A Makary; Daniel V Samarov; Jennifer L Bennett; Susan L Gearhart; Jonathan E Efron; Elizabeth C Wick Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2013-04-11 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Samuel G Parker; Steve Halligan; Mike K Liang; Filip E Muysoms; Gina L Adrales; Adam Boutall; Andrew C de Beaux; Ulrich A Dietz; Celia M Divino; Mary T Hawn; Todd B Heniford; Joon P Hong; Nabeel Ibrahim; Kamal M F Itani; Lars N Jorgensen; Agneta Montgomery; Salvador Morales-Conde; Yohann Renard; David L Sanders; Neil J Smart; Jared J Torkington; Alastair C J Windsor Journal: World J Surg Date: 2020-04 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Caroline J Rieser; Jurgis Alvikas; Heather Phelos; Lauren B Hall; Amer H Zureikat; Andrew Lee; Melanie Ongchin; Matthew P Holtzman; James F Pingpank; David L Bartlett; M Haroon A Choudry Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2022-01-06 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Kara A Rothenberg; Jordan R Stern; Elizabeth L George; Amber W Trickey; Arden M Morris; Daniel E Hall; Jason M Johanning; Mary T Hawn; Shipra Arya Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2019-05-03
Authors: Caroline J Rieser; Lauren B Hall; Eliza Kang; Amer H Zureikat; Matthew P Holtzman; James F Pingpank; David L Bartlett; M Haroon A Choudry Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2021-01-23 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Laura A Graham; Mary T Hawn; Elise A Dasinger; Samantha J Baker; Brad S Oriel; Tyler S Wahl; Joshua S Richman; Laurel A Copeland; Kamal M F Itani; Edith A Burns; Jeffrey Whittle; Melanie S Morris Journal: Med Care Date: 2021-10-01 Impact factor: 3.178