Literature DB >> 29710125

Long-Term Effectiveness of Sigmoidoscopy Screening on Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Women and Men: A Randomized Trial.

Øyvind Holme1, Magnus Løberg1, Mette Kalager2, Michael Bretthauer1, Miguel A Hernán2, Eline Aas3, Tor J Eide1, Eva Skovlund4, Jon Lekven5, Jörn Schneede6, Kjell Magne Tveit7, Morten Vatn7, Giske Ursin8, Geir Hoff9.   

Abstract

Background: The long-term effects of sigmoidoscopy screening on colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality in women and men are unclear. Objective: To determine the effectiveness of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening after 15 years of follow-up in women and men. Design: Randomized controlled trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00119912). Setting: Oslo and Telemark County, Norway. Participants: Adults aged 50 to 64 years at baseline without prior CRC. Intervention: Screening (between 1999 and 2001) with flexible sigmoidoscopy with and without additional fecal blood testing versus no screening. Participants with positive screening results were offered colonoscopy. Measurements: Age-adjusted CRC incidence and mortality stratified by sex.
Results: Of 98 678 persons, 20 552 were randomly assigned to screening and 78 126 to no screening. Adherence rates were 64.7% in women and 61.4% in men. Median follow-up was 14.8 years. The absolute risks for CRC in women were 1.86% in the screening group and 2.05% in the control group (risk difference, -0.19 percentage point [95% CI, -0.49 to 0.11 percentage point]; HR, 0.92 [CI, 0.79 to 1.07]). In men, the corresponding risks were 1.72% and 2.50%, respectively (risk difference, -0.78 percentage point [CI, -1.08 to -0.48 percentage points]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.66 [CI, 0.57 to 0.78]) (P for heterogeneity = 0.004). The absolute risks for death from CRC in women were 0.60% in the screening group and 0.59% in the control group (risk difference, 0.01 percentage point [CI, -0.16 to 0.18 percentage point]; HR, 1.01 [CI, 0.77 to 1.33]). The corresponding risks for death from CRC in men were 0.49% and 0.81%, respectively (risk difference, -0.33 percentage point [CI, -0.49 to -0.16 percentage point]; HR, 0.63 [CI, 0.47 to 0.83]) (P for heterogeneity = 0.014). Limitation: Follow-up through national registries.
Conclusion: Offering sigmoidoscopy screening in Norway reduced CRC incidence and mortality in men but had little or no effect in women. Primary Funding Source: Norwegian government and Norwegian Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29710125      PMCID: PMC6853067          DOI: 10.7326/M17-1441

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  20 in total

Review 1.  Screening for colorectal cancer using the faecal occult blood test, Hemoccult.

Authors:  P Hewitson; P Glasziou; L Irwig; B Towler; E Watson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-01-24

2.  Reanalysis of All-Cause Mortality in the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force 2016 Evidence Report on Colorectal Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Andrew W Swartz; Jan M Eberth; Michele J Josey; Scott M Strayer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Effect of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Øyvind Holme; Magnus Løberg; Mette Kalager; Michael Bretthauer; Miguel A Hernán; Eline Aas; Tor J Eide; Eva Skovlund; Jørn Schneede; Kjell Magne Tveit; Geir Hoff
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Colonoscopic screening of average-risk women for colorectal neoplasia.

Authors:  Philip Schoenfeld; Brooks Cash; Andrew Flood; Richard Dobhan; John Eastone; Walter Coyle; James W Kikendall; Hyungjin Myra Kim; David G Weiss; Theresa Emory; Arthur Schatzkin; David Lieberman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-05-19       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Sex- and gender-specific disparities in colorectal cancer risk.

Authors:  Sung-Eun Kim; Hee Young Paik; Hyuk Yoon; Jung Eun Lee; Nayoung Kim; Mi-Kyung Sung
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Patient-reported outcomes following flexible sigmoidoscopy screening for colorectal cancer in a demonstration screening programme in the UK.

Authors:  Kathryn A Robb; Siu Hing Lo; Emily Power; Ines Kralj-Hans; Robert Edwards; Maggie Vance; Christian von Wagner; Wendy Atkin; Jane Wardle
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.136

7.  Design, organization and management of a controlled population screening study for detection of colorectal neoplasia: attendance rates in the NORCCAP study (Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention).

Authors:  M Bretthauer; G Gondal; K Larsen; E Carlsen; T J Eide; T Grotmol; E Skovlund; K M Tveit; M H Vatn; G Hoff
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.423

8.  The Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention (NORCCAP) screening study: baseline findings and implementations for clinical work-up in age groups 50-64 years.

Authors:  G Gondal; T Grotmol; B Hofstad; M Bretthauer; T J Eide; G Hoff
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.423

9.  Continuous evaluation of patient satisfaction in endoscopy centres.

Authors:  I K Larsen; T Grotmol; M Bretthauer; G Gondal; G Huppertz-Hauss; B Hofstad; P Efskind; A Jørgensen; G Hoff
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.423

10.  Long term effects of once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening after 17 years of follow-up: the UK Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Wendy Atkin; Kate Wooldrage; D Maxwell Parkin; Ines Kralj-Hans; Eilidh MacRae; Urvi Shah; Stephen Duffy; Amanda J Cross
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  29 in total

1.  Effect of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: long-term follow-up of the randomised US PLCO cancer screening trial.

Authors:  Eric A Miller; Paul F Pinsky; Robert E Schoen; Philip C Prorok; Timothy R Church
Journal:  Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-11-29

2.  Screening flexible sigmoidoscopy versus colonoscopy for reduction of colorectal cancer mortality.

Authors:  Cynthia W Ko; V Paul Doria-Rose; Michael J Barrett; Aruna Kamineni; Lindsey Enewold; Noel S Weiss
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Harms and Benefits of Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Bernt-Peter Robra
Journal:  Recent Results Cancer Res       Date:  2021

Review 4.  Screening for Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Samir Gupta
Journal:  Hematol Oncol Clin North Am       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 2.861

5.  Overall and stage-specific survival of patients with screen-detected colorectal cancer in European countries: A population-based study in 9 countries.

Authors:  Rafael Cardoso; Feng Guo; Thomas Heisser; Harlinde De Schutter; Nancy Van Damme; Mef Christina Nilbert; Jane Christensen; Anne-Marie Bouvier; Véronique Bouvier; Guy Launoy; Anne-Sophie Woronoff; Mélanie Cariou; Michel Robaszkiewicz; Patricia Delafosse; Florence Poncet; Paul M Walsh; Carlo Senore; Stefano Rosso; Valery E P P Lemmens; Marloes A G Elferink; Sonja Tomšič; Tina Žagar; Arantza Lopez de Munain Marques; Rafael Marcos-Gragera; Montse Puigdemont; Jaume Galceran; Marià Carulla; Antonia Sánchez-Gil; María-Dolores Chirlaque; Michael Hoffmeister; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  Lancet Reg Health Eur       Date:  2022-07-06

6.  Modeling in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Assessing External and Predictive Validity of MISCAN-Colon Microsimulation Model Using NORCCAP Trial Results.

Authors:  Maaike Buskermolen; Andrea Gini; Steffie K Naber; Esther Toes-Zoutendijk; Harry J de Koning; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2018-10-20       Impact factor: 2.583

7.  Influence of Varying Quantitative Fecal Immunochemical Test Positivity Thresholds on Colorectal Cancer Detection: A Community-Based Cohort Study.

Authors:  Kevin Selby; Christopher D Jensen; Jeffrey K Lee; Chyke A Doubeni; Joanne E Schottinger; Wei K Zhao; Jessica Chubak; Ethan Halm; Nirupa R Ghai; Richard Contreras; Celette Skinner; Aruna Kamineni; Theodore R Levin; Douglas A Corley
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Findings during screening colonoscopies in a Middle Eastern cohort.

Authors:  Majid A Almadi; Abed Allehibi; Mohammad A Aljebreen; Othman R Alharbi; Nahla Azzam; Abdulrahman M Aljebreen
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.485

9.  Incidence and Mortality of Proximal and Distal Colorectal Cancer in Germany—Trends in the Era of Screening Colonoscopy.

Authors:  Rafael Cardoso; Anna Zhu; Feng Guo; Thomas Heisser; Michael Hoffmeister; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 5.594

10.  Gender differences in stage at diagnosis and preoperative radiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  Cristina Sarasqueta; Mª Victoria Zunzunegui; José María Enríquez Navascues; Arrate Querejeta; Carlos Placer; Amaia Perales; Nerea Gonzalez; Urko Aguirre; Marisa Baré; Antonio Escobar; José María Quintana
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.