Literature DB >> 29708928

Revisiting monovision for presbyopia.

Abdallah Mahrous1, Jessica B Ciralsky, Edward C Lai.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Presbyopia is an inevitable age-related loss of accommodation that results in spectacle dependence with common everyday near-vision tasks. Many surgical approaches to presbyopic correction have been investigated, with monovision correction being amongst the most common and attractive options. In this article, we will review the advantages and disadvantages of the new modalities of presbyopic monovision correction. RECENT
FINDINGS: New methods such as mini-monovision, corneal inlays, and multifocal corneal ablation aim to maximize stereopsis and decrease the anisometropic side effects of conventional monovision. These include inlays such as the KAMRA and Raindrop, and phakic intraocular lenses such as the hole ICL. Newer corneal laser refractive procedures such as small incision lenticule extraction have also shown good outcomes with monovision. Pseudophakic monovision using standard monofocal lenses still provides good results.
SUMMARY: Monovision for presbyopic correction continues to provide promising results. There are a number of new devices and techniques that have shown good visual acuity outcomes, patient satisfaction and spectacle independence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29708928     DOI: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000487

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1040-8738            Impact factor:   3.761


  8 in total

1.  Premium Monovision versus Bilateral Myopic Monovision, Hybrid Monovision and Bilateral Trifocal Implantation: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Georgios Labiris; Eirini-Kanella Panagiotopoulou; Asli Perente; Panagiota Ntonti; Konstantinos Delibasis; Ioannis Fotiadis; Aristeidis Konstantinidis; Doukas Dardabounis
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-03-04

2.  Pseudophakic mini-monovision: high patient satisfaction, reduced spectacle dependence, and low cost.

Authors:  Debora Goetz Goldberg; Michael H Goldberg; Riddhi Shah; Jane N Meagher; Haresh Ailani
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 2.209

3.  Psychophysical Tests Do Not Identify Ocular Dominance Consistently.

Authors:  Miguel A García-Pérez; Eli Peli
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2019-04-29

4.  Near Vision Improvement with the Use of a New Topical Compound for Presbyopia Correction: A Prospective, Consecutive Interventional Non-Comparative Clinical Study.

Authors:  Veronica Vargas; Felipe Vejarano; Jorge L Alió
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2018-11-21

5.  Spectacle Independence And Patient Satisfaction With Pseudophakic Mini-Monovision Using Aberration-Free Intraocular Lens.

Authors:  Tarek Abdelrazek Hafez; Hany Ahmed Helaly
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10-31

6.  Long-term follow-up for monovision surgery by Implantable Collamer Lens V4c implantation for myopia correction in early presbyopia.

Authors:  Yuhao Ye; Jing Zhao; Zhe Zhang; Lingling Niu; Wanru Shi; Xiaoying Wang; Xingtao Zhou
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 3.535

Review 7.  Presbyopia - A Review of Current Treatment Options and Emerging Therapies.

Authors:  James A Katz; Paul M Karpecki; Alexandra Dorca; Sima Chiva-Razavi; Heather Floyd; Elizabeth Barnes; Mark Wuttke; Eric Donnenfeld
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-05-24

8.  Crossed versus conventional pseudophakic monovision for high myopic eyes: a prospective, randomized pilot study.

Authors:  Yan Xun; Wenjuan Wan; Lu Jiang; Ke Hu
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 2.209

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.