Cristina Palacios1, Maribel Campos2, Cheryl Gibby3, Marytere Meléndez4, Jae Eun Lee5, Jinan Banna3. 1. a Department of Dietetics and Nutrition , Robert Stempel College of Public Health & Social Work, Florida International University , Miami , FL , USA. 2. b Dental and Craniofacial Genomics Center, Endowed Health Services Research Center, Medical Sciences Campus, University of Puerto Rico , San Juan , PR , USA. 3. c Department of Human Nutrition , Food and Animal Sciences, College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources, University of Hawaii at Manoa , Manoa , HI , USA. 4. d Center for Clinical Research and Health Promotion, Medical Sciences Campus, University of Puerto Rico , San Juan , PR , USA. 5. e College of Science, Engineering and Technology, Jackson State University , Jackson , MI , USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To test the effects of weekly SMS for improving infant feeding practices and infant weight. METHODS: This was a multi-site randomized clinical trial in a convenience sample of 202 caregivers of healthy term infants 0-2 months participating in the WIC program in Puerto Rico and Hawaii. Participants were randomized to receive SMS about infant's general health issues (control) or SMS for improving feeding practices (intervention) for four months. Weight, length and infant feeding practices were assessed at baseline and four months later. RESULTS: A total of 170 participants completed the study (n = 86 control and n = 84 intervention). Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. At the end, exclusive breastfeeding rates were similar between groups (67.4% control and 59.1% intervention). Introduction of other foods and beverages, addition of foods to the bottle, placing infants to sleep with milk bottles, caregiver's method and response to feeding infants and distractions while feeding infants were similar between groups. Also, weight status or rate of weight gain was similar between groups. CONCLUSION: There were no significant improvements in feeding practices or in weight with the intervention. The timeline of the messages in relation to the targeted behavior may have affected the effectiveness of the intervention. Earlier dissemination of messages, higher level of intensity, longer intervention, additional contacts and inclusion of other caregivers may be needed to achieve the desired effects.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To test the effects of weekly SMS for improving infant feeding practices and infant weight. METHODS: This was a multi-site randomized clinical trial in a convenience sample of 202 caregivers of healthy term infants 0-2 months participating in the WIC program in Puerto Rico and Hawaii. Participants were randomized to receive SMS about infant's general health issues (control) or SMS for improving feeding practices (intervention) for four months. Weight, length and infant feeding practices were assessed at baseline and four months later. RESULTS: A total of 170 participants completed the study (n = 86 control and n = 84 intervention). Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. At the end, exclusive breastfeeding rates were similar between groups (67.4% control and 59.1% intervention). Introduction of other foods and beverages, addition of foods to the bottle, placing infants to sleep with milk bottles, caregiver's method and response to feeding infants and distractions while feeding infants were similar between groups. Also, weight status or rate of weight gain was similar between groups. CONCLUSION: There were no significant improvements in feeding practices or in weight with the intervention. The timeline of the messages in relation to the targeted behavior may have affected the effectiveness of the intervention. Earlier dissemination of messages, higher level of intensity, longer intervention, additional contacts and inclusion of other caregivers may be needed to achieve the desired effects.
Entities:
Keywords:
Infant; feeding practices; mobile messages; weight, intervention
Authors: Kirsten L Rennie; M Barbara E Livingstone; Jonathan C K Wells; A McGloin; W Andrew Coward; Andrew M Prentice; Susan A Jebb Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Elsie M Taveras; Matthew W Gillman; Ken Kleinman; Janet W Rich-Edwards; Sheryl L Rifas-Shiman Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2010-03-01 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Karen J Campbell; Sandrine Lioret; Sarah A McNaughton; David A Crawford; Jo Salmon; Kylie Ball; Zoe McCallum; Bibi E Gerner; Alison C Spence; Adrian J Cameron; Jill A Hnatiuk; Obioha C Ukoumunne; Lisa Gold; Gavin Abbott; Kylie D Hesketh Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2013-03-04 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Elizabeth O Ofili; Paul B Tchounwou; Emma Fernandez-Repollet; Richard Yanagihara; Tabia H Akintobi; Jae E Lee; Mohamad Malouhi; Solomon T Garner; Traci T Hayes; Almelida R Baker; Andrew L Dent; Muna Abdelrahim; Latrice Rollins; Sandra P Chang; Angela Sy; Brenda Y Hernandez; Pamela L Bullard; Richard J Noel; Bruce Shiramizu; Jerris R Hedges; Marla J Berry; Vincent C Bond; Maria F Lima; Noreen Mokuau; Robert A Kirken; Marcia Cruz-Correa; Daniel F Sarpong; Jaydutt Vadgama; Clayton Yates; Shafiq A Kahn; Karam F Soliman; George Perry; Mark Pezzano; Carlos A Luciano; M Edwina Barnett; Adebayo Oyekan; Deepak Kumar; Keith C Norris Journal: Ethn Dis Date: 2019-02-21 Impact factor: 1.847
Authors: Jill R Demirci; Brian Suffoletto; Jack Doman; Melissa Glasser; Judy C Chang; Susan M Sereika; Debra L Bogen Journal: JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Date: 2020-04-29 Impact factor: 4.773