Literature DB >> 29708372

Using the Violence Risk Scale-Sexual Offense version in sexual violence risk assessments: Updated risk categories and recidivism estimates from a multisite sample of treated sexual offenders.

Mark E Olver1, James C Mundt2, David Thornton3, Sarah M Beggs Christofferson4, Drew A Kingston5, Justina N Sowden6, Terry P Nicholaichuk1, Audrey Gordon6, Stephen C P Wong1.   

Abstract

The present study sought to develop updated risk categories and recidivism estimates for the Violence Risk Scale-Sexual Offense version (VRS-SO; Wong, Olver, Nicholaichuk, & Gordon, 2003-2017), a sexual offender risk assessment and treatment planning tool. The overarching purpose was to increase the clarity and accuracy of communicating risk assessment information that includes a systematic incorporation of new information (i.e., change) to modify risk estimates. Four treated samples of sexual offenders with VRS-SO pretreatment, posttreatment, and Static-99R ratings were combined with a minimum follow-up period of 10-years postrelease (N = 913). Logistic regression was used to model 5- and 10-year sexual and violent (including sexual) recidivism estimates across 6 different regression models employing specific risk and change score information from the VRS-SO and/or Static-99R. A rationale is presented for clinical applications of select models and the necessity of controlling for baseline risk when utilizing change information across repeated assessments. Information concerning relative risk (percentiles) and absolute risk (recidivism estimates) is integrated with common risk assessment language guidelines to generate new risk categories for the VRS-SO. Guidelines for model selection and forensic clinical application of the risk estimates are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29708372     DOI: 10.1037/pas0000538

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Assess        ISSN: 1040-3590


  5 in total

Review 1.  Sex Offender Risk Assessment: Where Are We and Where Are We Going?

Authors:  L Maaike Helmus
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2018-05-19       Impact factor: 5.285

2.  A Static-99R Validation Study on Individuals With Mental Disorders: 5 to 20 Years of Fixed Follow-Up After Sexual Offenses.

Authors:  Christian Baudin; Thomas Nilsson; Joakim Sturup; Märta Wallinius; Peter Andiné
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-02-02

3.  Improving Our Risk Communication: Standardized Risk Levels for Brief Assessment of Recidivism Risk-2002R.

Authors:  Julie Blais; Kelly M Babchishin; R Karl Hanson
Journal:  Sex Abuse       Date:  2021-10-20

4.  The Predictive Properties of Psychiatric Diagnoses, Dynamic Risk and Dynamic Risk Change Assessed by the VRS-SO in Forensically Admitted and Released Sexual Offenders.

Authors:  Reinhard Eher; Sandra Hofer; Anna Buchgeher; Stefan Domany; Daniel Turner; Mark E Olver
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 4.157

5.  Understanding the Latent Structure of Dynamic Risk: Seeking Empirical Constraints on Theory Development Using the VRS-SO and the Theory of Dynamic Risk.

Authors:  Mark E Olver; David Thornton; Sarah M Beggs Christofferson
Journal:  Sex Abuse       Date:  2021-04-05
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.