Literature DB >> 29779064

Sex Offender Risk Assessment: Where Are We and Where Are We Going?

L Maaike Helmus1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Risk assessment is one of the most ubiquitous tasks in the criminal justice system, informing virtually every decision made about offenders. This review, intended for researchers and practitioners, outlines some of the most important recent advances, emerging issues, and recommendations in sex offender risk assessment. RECENT
FINDINGS: The underlying nature and purpose of risk scales is reviewed, with implications for how we should evaluate them. Limits of recidivism probability estimates are discussed, and efforts to advance a common language for describing risk levels are highlighted. Advances in risk communication and field validity are summarized. The utility of protective risk factors in risk assessments is debated. Emerging areas in assessing offender change and assessments with child pornography offenders are discussed. Despite critical advances in the last few years, there are still important gaps in knowledge, particularly for risk communication, field implementation, offender change, and child pornography offenders.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Offender assessment; Prediction; Recidivism; Risk assessment; Sexual offenders

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29779064     DOI: 10.1007/s11920-018-0909-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep        ISSN: 1523-3812            Impact factor:   5.285


  39 in total

1.  Stability of the interpretative risk percentages for the RRASOR and Static-99.

Authors:  Dennis M Doren
Journal:  Sex Abuse       Date:  2004-01

Review 2.  Clinical versus actuarial judgment.

Authors:  R M Dawes; D Faust; P E Meehl
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-03-31       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Different actuarial risk measures produce different risk rankings for sexual offenders.

Authors:  Howard E Barbaree; Calvin M Langton; Edward J Peacock
Journal:  Sex Abuse       Date:  2006-10

4.  Same score, different message: perceptions of offender risk depend on Static-99R risk communication format.

Authors:  Jorge G Varela; Marcus T Boccaccini; Veronica A Cuervo; Daniel C Murrie; John W Clark
Journal:  Law Hum Behav       Date:  2013-12-30

5.  The validity and reliability of the Violence Risk Scale-Sexual Offender version: assessing sex offender risk and evaluating therapeutic change.

Authors:  Mark E Olver; Stephen C P Wong; Terry Nicholaichuk; Audrey Gordon
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2007-09

6.  Conditions for intuitive expertise: a failure to disagree.

Authors:  Daniel Kahneman; Gary Klein
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2009-09

7.  Static-99R reporting practices in sexually violent predator cases: Does norm selection reflect adversarial allegiance?

Authors:  Caroline S Chevalier; Marcus T Boccaccini; Daniel C Murrie; Jorge G Varela
Journal:  Law Hum Behav       Date:  2014-12-15

8.  Evaluation and applications of the clinically significant change method with the Violence Risk Scale-Sexual Offender version: implications for risk-change communication.

Authors:  Mark E Olver; Sarah M Beggs Christofferson; Stephen C P Wong
Journal:  Behav Sci Law       Date:  2015-02

9.  A Validation Study of the Child Pornography Offender Risk Tool (CPORT).

Authors:  Angela W Eke; L Maaike Helmus; Michael C Seto
Journal:  Sex Abuse       Date:  2018-03-29

10.  Online child pornography offenders are different: a meta-analysis of the characteristics of online and offline sex offenders against children.

Authors:  Kelly M Babchishin; R Karl Hanson; Heather VanZuylen
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2014-03-14
View more
  1 in total

1.  A Static-99R Validation Study on Individuals With Mental Disorders: 5 to 20 Years of Fixed Follow-Up After Sexual Offenses.

Authors:  Christian Baudin; Thomas Nilsson; Joakim Sturup; Märta Wallinius; Peter Andiné
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-02-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.