BACKGROUND: Thymic neuroendocrine tumors (TNT), in the anterior mediastinum, are extremely rare diseases which have significantly poor prognoses. Studies have rarely provided conclusive evidence of the prognostic factors of TNT. Standard therapies have been controversial. METHODS: TNT patients (n=173) were enrolled from Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database (SEER). Univariate and multivariate analyses were utilized to evaluate predictive factors of prognoses. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the plausible correlation between histological grade, and cancer invasion. Stratification analysis was used to evaluate the effectiveness of adjuvant therapies. RESULTS: According to our analysis, local Masaoka stage, surgery, radiotherapy, and non-chemotherapy predicted better overall survival (OS) (P<0.05, for all) in 173 TNT patients. We found that the higher the histological grade of the tumor, the greater the rate of metastasis (P<0.05). The focus was on 125 surgically treated patients, who were females with poor prognostic factors of OS, upgraded histological grade, and advanced Masaoka stage (P<0.01, for all). The effectiveness of radiotherapy treatments had discrepancies at different clinical stages. In the local stage, radiotherapy caused significantly worse OS (P=0.011), while in the advanced stage, patients demonstrated significantly better OS with this treatment (P=0.028). Chemotherapy caused worse OS, primarily, in females (P=0.028). CONCLUSIONS: Surgery, Masaoka stage, and adjuvant treatments were prognostic factors. With surgically treated TNT, gender, histological grade, and Masaoka stage predicted significantly worse OS. Chemotherapy decreased female patients' OS. Radiotherapy significantly promoted advanced and local advanced patients' OS; however, it decreased local stage patients' OS. Predicted TNT invasiveness significantly correlated with histological grade.
BACKGROUND: Thymic neuroendocrine tumors (TNT), in the anterior mediastinum, are extremely rare diseases which have significantly poor prognoses. Studies have rarely provided conclusive evidence of the prognostic factors of TNT. Standard therapies have been controversial. METHODS: TNT patients (n=173) were enrolled from Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database (SEER). Univariate and multivariate analyses were utilized to evaluate predictive factors of prognoses. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the plausible correlation between histological grade, and cancer invasion. Stratification analysis was used to evaluate the effectiveness of adjuvant therapies. RESULTS: According to our analysis, local Masaoka stage, surgery, radiotherapy, and non-chemotherapy predicted better overall survival (OS) (P<0.05, for all) in 173 TNT patients. We found that the higher the histological grade of the tumor, the greater the rate of metastasis (P<0.05). The focus was on 125 surgically treated patients, who were females with poor prognostic factors of OS, upgraded histological grade, and advanced Masaoka stage (P<0.01, for all). The effectiveness of radiotherapy treatments had discrepancies at different clinical stages. In the local stage, radiotherapy caused significantly worse OS (P=0.011), while in the advanced stage, patients demonstrated significantly better OS with this treatment (P=0.028). Chemotherapy caused worse OS, primarily, in females (P=0.028). CONCLUSIONS: Surgery, Masaoka stage, and adjuvant treatments were prognostic factors. With surgically treated TNT, gender, histological grade, and Masaoka stage predicted significantly worse OS. Chemotherapy decreased female patients' OS. Radiotherapy significantly promoted advanced and local advanced patients' OS; however, it decreased local stage patients' OS. Predicted TNT invasiveness significantly correlated with histological grade.
Entities:
Keywords:
Chemotherapy; neuroendocrine tumors (NETs); prognoses; radiotherapy; surgery
Authors: Giuseppe Cardillo; Federico Rea; Marco Lucchi; Marinus A Paul; Stefano Margaritora; Francesco Carleo; Giuseppe Marulli; Alfredo Mussi; Pierluigi Granone; Paolo Graziano Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2012-05-26 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Bernard Nordlinger; Halfdan Sorbye; Bengt Glimelius; Graeme J Poston; Peter M Schlag; Philippe Rougier; Wolf O Bechstein; John N Primrose; Euan T Walpole; Meg Finch-Jones; Daniel Jaeck; Darius Mirza; Rowan W Parks; Murielle Mauer; Erik Tanis; Eric Van Cutsem; Werner Scheithauer; Thomas Gruenberger Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2013-10-11 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: J Jonklaas; G Nogueras-Gonzalez; M Munsell; D Litofsky; K B Ain; S T Bigos; J D Brierley; D S Cooper; B R Haugen; P W Ladenson; J Magner; J Robbins; D S Ross; M C Skarulis; D L Steward; H R Maxon; S I Sherman Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2012-04-10 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Philipp Ströbel; Andrea Bauer; Bernhard Puppe; Til Kraushaar; Axel Krein; Klaus Toyka; Ralf Gold; Michael Semik; Reinhard Kiefer; Wilfred Nix; Berthold Schalke; Hans Konrad Müller-Hermelink; Alexander Marx Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-04-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: James C Yao; Manal Hassan; Alexandria Phan; Cecile Dagohoy; Colleen Leary; Jeannette E Mares; Eddie K Abdalla; Jason B Fleming; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Asif Rashid; Douglas B Evans Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-06-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Brandon G Bentz; Bhuvanesh Singh; James Woodruff; Murray Brennan; Jatin P Shah; Dennis Kraus Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Ondrej Majek; Adam Gondos; Lina Jansen; Katharina Emrich; Bernd Holleczek; Alexander Katalinic; Alice Nennecke; Andrea Eberle; Hermann Brenner Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-07-05 Impact factor: 3.240