CONTEXT: Thyroid cancer predominately affects women, carries a worse prognosis in older age, and may have higher mortality in men. Superimposed on these observations is the fact that most women have attained menopause by age 55 yr. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to determine whether men contribute disproportionately to papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) mortality or whether menopause affects PTC prognosis. DESIGN: Gender-specific mortality was normalized using age-matched subjects from the U.S. population. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models incorporating gender, age, and National Thyroid Cancer Treatment Cooperative Study Group stage were used to model disease-specific survival (DSS). PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: Patients were followed in a prospective registry. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The relationships between gender, age, and PTC outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: The unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) for DSS for women was 0.40 [confidence interval (CI) 0.24-0.65]. This female advantage diminished when DSS was adjusted for age at diagnosis and stage with a HR encompassing unity (HR 0.72, CI 0.44-1.19). Additional multivariate models of DSS considering gender, disease stage, and various age groupings showed that the DSS for women diagnosed at under 55 yr was improved over men (HR 0.33, CI 0.13-0.81). However, the HR for DSS increased to become similar to men for women diagnosed at 55-69 yr (HR 1.01, CI 0.42-2.37) and at 70 yr or greater (HR 1.17, CI 0.48-2.85). CONCLUSIONS: Although the overall outcome of women with PTC is similar to men, subgroup analysis showed that this composite outcome is composed of two periods with different outcomes. The first period is a period with better outcomes for women than men when the diagnosis occurs at younger than 55 yr; the second is a period with similar outcomes for both women and men diagnosed at ages greater than 55 yr. These data raise the question of whether an older age cutoff would improve current staging systems. We hypothesize that older age modifies the effect of gender on outcomes due to menopause-associated hormonal alterations.
CONTEXT: Thyroid cancer predominately affects women, carries a worse prognosis in older age, and may have higher mortality in men. Superimposed on these observations is the fact that most women have attained menopause by age 55 yr. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to determine whether men contribute disproportionately to papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) mortality or whether menopause affects PTC prognosis. DESIGN: Gender-specific mortality was normalized using age-matched subjects from the U.S. population. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models incorporating gender, age, and National Thyroid Cancer Treatment Cooperative Study Group stage were used to model disease-specific survival (DSS). PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING:Patients were followed in a prospective registry. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The relationships between gender, age, and PTC outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: The unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) for DSS for women was 0.40 [confidence interval (CI) 0.24-0.65]. This female advantage diminished when DSS was adjusted for age at diagnosis and stage with a HR encompassing unity (HR 0.72, CI 0.44-1.19). Additional multivariate models of DSS considering gender, disease stage, and various age groupings showed that the DSS for women diagnosed at under 55 yr was improved over men (HR 0.33, CI 0.13-0.81). However, the HR for DSS increased to become similar to men for women diagnosed at 55-69 yr (HR 1.01, CI 0.42-2.37) and at 70 yr or greater (HR 1.17, CI 0.48-2.85). CONCLUSIONS: Although the overall outcome of women with PTC is similar to men, subgroup analysis showed that this composite outcome is composed of two periods with different outcomes. The first period is a period with better outcomes for women than men when the diagnosis occurs at younger than 55 yr; the second is a period with similar outcomes for both women and men diagnosed at ages greater than 55 yr. These data raise the question of whether an older age cutoff would improve current staging systems. We hypothesize that older age modifies the effect of gender on outcomes due to menopause-associated hormonal alterations.
Authors: Johannes Blom; Li Yin; Annika Lidén; Anders Dolk; Bengt Jeppsson; Lars Påhlman; Lars Holmberg; Olof Nyrén Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2008-04-01 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: A Micheli; R Ciampichini; W Oberaigner; L Ciccolallo; E de Vries; I Izarzugaza; P Zambon; G Gatta; R De Angelis Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2008-12-26 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Shilpi Rajoria; Robert Suriano; Arulkumaran Shanmugam; Yushan Lisa Wilson; Stimson P Schantz; Jan Geliebter; Raj K Tiwari Journal: Thyroid Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: Stephen F Sener; David J Winchester; David P Winchester; Hongyan Du; Ermilo Barrera; Malcolm Bilimoria; Seth Krantz; Sarah Rabbitt Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: M Tubiana; M Schlumberger; P Rougier; A Laplanche; E Benhamou; P Gardet; B Caillou; J P Travagli; C Parmentier Journal: Cancer Date: 1985-02-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Ryan K Orosco; Timon Hussain; Kevin T Brumund; Deborah K Oh; David C Chang; Michael Bouvet Journal: Thyroid Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: Robert I Haddad; William M Lydiatt; Douglas W Ball; Naifa Lamki Busaidy; David Byrd; Glenda Callender; Paxton Dickson; Quan-Yang Duh; Hormoz Ehya; Megan Haymart; Carl Hoh; Jason P Hunt; Andrei Iagaru; Fouad Kandeel; Peter Kopp; Dominick M Lamonica; Judith C McCaffrey; Jeffrey F Moley; Lee Parks; Christopher D Raeburn; John A Ridge; Matthew D Ringel; Randall P Scheri; Jatin P Shah; Robert C Smallridge; Cord Sturgeon; Thomas N Wang; Lori J Wirth; Karin G Hoffmann; Miranda Hughes Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Iain J Nixon; Laura Y Wang; Jocelyn C Migliacci; Antoine Eskander; Michael J Campbell; Ahmad Aniss; Lilah Morris; Fernanda Vaisman; Rossana Corbo; Denise Momesso; Mario Vaisman; Andre Carvalho; Diana Learoyd; William D Leslie; Richard W Nason; Deborah Kuk; Volkert Wreesmann; Luc Morris; Frank L Palmer; Ian Ganly; Snehal G Patel; Bhuvanesh Singh; R Michael Tuttle; Ashok R Shaha; Mithat Gönen; K Alok Pathak; Wen T Shen; Mark Sywak; Luis Kowalski; Jeremy Freeman; Nancy Perrier; Jatin P Shah Journal: Thyroid Date: 2016-02-25 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: Aubrey A Carhill; Danielle R Litofsky; Douglas S Ross; Jacqueline Jonklaas; David S Cooper; James D Brierley; Paul W Ladenson; Kenneth B Ain; Henry G Fein; Bryan R Haugen; James Magner; Monica C Skarulis; David L Steward; Mingxhao Xing; Harry R Maxon; Steven I Sherman Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2015-07-14 Impact factor: 5.958