Literature DB >> 29707199

Epigenetic silencing of lncRNA MORT in 16 TCGA cancer types.

Lukas Vrba1, Bernard W Futscher1,2.   

Abstract

We have previously described a hominid-specific long non-coding RNA, MORT (also known as ZNF667-AS1, Gene ID: 100128252), which is expressed in all normal cell types, but epigenetically silenced during cancer-associated immortalization of human mammary epithelial cells.  Initial analysis of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) showed that 15 of 17 cancer types, which represent the 10 most common cancers in women and men, display DNA methylation associated MORT silencing in a large fraction of their tumors.  In this study we analyzed MORT expression and DNA methylation state in the remaining 16 TCGA cancer types not previously reported.  Seven of the 16 cancer types showed DNA methylation linked MORT silencing in a large fraction of their tumors.  These are carcinomas (cervical cancer, and cancers of esophagus, stomach, and bile duct), and the non-epithelial tumors mesothelioma, sarcoma, and uterine carcinosarcoma.  Together with the findings from our previous report, MORT expression is silenced by aberrant DNA methylation in 22 of 33 of TCGA cancer types.  These 22 cancers include most carcinoma types, blood derived cancers and sarcomas.  In conclusion, results suggest that the MORT gene is one of the most common epigenetic aberrations seen in human cancer.  Coupled with the timing of MORT gene silencing during in vitro epithelial cell immortalization and its occurrence early in the temporal arc of human carcinogenesis, this provides strong circumstantial evidence for a tumor suppressor role for MORT.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA Methylation; Epigenetics; Gene Silencing; MORT; ZNF667-AS1; lincRNA; lncRNA; ncRNA

Year:  2018        PMID: 29707199      PMCID: PMC5883388          DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.13944.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  F1000Res        ISSN: 2046-1402


Introduction

MORT was originally found as a transcript silenced during in vitro immortalization of human mammary epithelial cells [1]. Like a significant majority of lncRNAs, MORT’s molecular function remains enigmatic. The MORT gene is specific to higher primates, is expressed in all normal human cell types, and MORT RNA is located predominantly in the cytoplasm [1]. Analysis of MORT expression and the DNA methylation state of its promoter in 17 cancer types from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) [2], which represent the 10 most frequent cancers in males and females, showed MORT is epigenetically silenced in 15 of 17 these cancers [1]. Based on the data from the original in vitro study [1], we predicted epigenetic MORT silencing occurs early in human carcinogenesis and therefore could be seen in premalignant lesions, such as ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast and colonic adenomas. We used data from clinical samples from published genomic data sets [3– 8] to address this possibility, and indeed, MORT loss occurs prior to or at the stage of pre-malignancy and not thereafter [9]. Taken together these facts suggest that MORT transcript has a tumor suppressive role and is not simply an epigenetic “passenger error.” Since our previous analysis of MORT in TCGA datasets was not exhaustive and only reported on 17 out of 33 TCGA cancer types, the goal of this short study was to extend our earlier work and complete the analysis of MORT DNA methylation associated gene silencing in the final 16 TCGA cancer types.

Methods

We integrated the MORT expression level and the DNA methylation state of its promoter region using TCGA data as described before [1]. The Illumina HiSeq RNA-seq and HumanMethylation450 DNA methylation data for samples of 16 TCGA cancer types listed in Table 1 were downloaded from the GDC data portal. The data were analyzed in the R programming environment, version 3.4.2 [10]. The mean RNA-Seq rpkm values for the two exons constituting the MORT RNA were plotted against the mean DNA methylation beta value of the 7 CpGs from the MORT promoter region for the individual samples of each cancer type. The Spearman correlation coefficient rho between the MORT RNA level and the DNA methylation of MORT promoter was calculated using the function cor.test.
Table 1.

The 16 TCGA cancer types analyzed in this study.

The numbers of primary tumor and normal samples for which both the MORT RNA expression and the MORT promoter DNA methylation data were available are listed. *DNA methylation data from HumanMethylation27 platform that covers 2 CpGs out of 7 CpGs covered by HumanMethylation450 were used.

TCGA Cancer Type NameAbbreviationTumor samplesNormal samples
adrenocortical carcinomaACC790
cervical squamous cell carcinoma and endocervical adenocarcinomaCESC3043
cholangiocarcinomaCHOL369
esophageal carcinomaESCA1849
glioblastoma multiformeGBM511
kidney chromophobeKICH660
brain lower grade gliomaLGG5160
mesotheliomaMESO870
ovarian serous cystadenocarcinomaOV * 2950
pheochromocytoma and paragangliomaPCPG1793
sarcomaSARC2590
stomach adenocarcinomaSTAD3730
testicular germ cell tumorsTGCT1500
thymomaTHYM1202
uterine carcinosarcomaUCS570
uveal melanomaUVM800

The 16 TCGA cancer types analyzed in this study.

The numbers of primary tumor and normal samples for which both the MORT RNA expression and the MORT promoter DNA methylation data were available are listed. *DNA methylation data from HumanMethylation27 platform that covers 2 CpGs out of 7 CpGs covered by HumanMethylation450 were used.

Results and discussion

Seven of sixteen analyzed cancer types (CESC, CHOL, ESCA, MESO, SARC, STAD, and UCS) show strong MORT silencing by DNA methylation ( Figure 1). The negative correlation rho between MORT expression and DNA methylation in these cancers is below -0.5; the DNA methylation level in some tumor samples of these cancers exceeds 0.5 beta (> 50% DNA methylation), and a large fraction of the tumor samples in these cancer types have very low to no MORT expression level ( Figure 1). The correlation of MORT expression and promoter DNA methylation in the remaining nine cancer types is also negative; however, the maximum level of the DNA methylation of MORT promoter in some of these cancers is either very low (UVM), or a very few tumor samples have MORT silenced (ACC, KICH, OV, and THYM), and some of the cancer types (GBM, LGG, PCPG, and TGCT) do not appear to display MORT gene silencing ( Figure 1).
Figure 1.

Integration of the MORT expression and the MORT promoter DNA methylation TCGA data for 16 tumor types.

The x-axis shows the MORT expression level according to RNA-seq and y-axis shows the level of MORT promoter DNA methylation according to Illumina HumanMethylation450 microarray. The correlation coefficient rho between the MORT expression and the DNA methylation of MORT promoter for each tumor type is displayed. The OV has a very low number (10) of samples analyzed by the HumanMethylation450 platform, therefore the data from the HumanMethylation27 platform that covers 2 CpGs out of 7 CpGs covered by HumanMethylation450 were used.

Integration of the MORT expression and the MORT promoter DNA methylation TCGA data for 16 tumor types.

The x-axis shows the MORT expression level according to RNA-seq and y-axis shows the level of MORT promoter DNA methylation according to Illumina HumanMethylation450 microarray. The correlation coefficient rho between the MORT expression and the DNA methylation of MORT promoter for each tumor type is displayed. The OV has a very low number (10) of samples analyzed by the HumanMethylation450 platform, therefore the data from the HumanMethylation27 platform that covers 2 CpGs out of 7 CpGs covered by HumanMethylation450 were used. The analysis presented shows DNA methylation associated MORT gene silencing in 7 of 16 TCGA cancer types. Compared to the 17 TCGA cancer types presented in our original study, [1] most the 16 cancer types presented here lack their respective normal tissues samples and some of them have lower amounts of tumor samples ( Table 1). Nevertheless, the distribution of MORT expression and DNA methylation data in tumor samples clearly indicates MORT silencing in multiple cancer types ( Figure 1). Cervical tumors (CESC) have high proportion of MORT silencing ( Figure 1); more than 75% of 304 cervical tumor samples have MORT promoter DNA hypermethylated and MORT silenced. Using TCGA data, a recent study found MORT downregulated in cervical cancer [11], but surprisingly did not report on or hypothesize potential mechanisms for this transcriptional repression. Here we confirm and extend their initial analysis of MORT silencing in cervical cancer and show further that this silencing is strongly linked to aberrant DNA methylation of the MORT promoter. Combined together with the findings from our previous report [1], Table 2 shows MORT is silenced by DNA methylation in a super majority of TCGA cancer types (22 of 33). MORT loss occurs predominantly due to epigenetic silencing and increased DNA methylation of its promoter in breast cancer [9]. This could likely be extended to all 22 cancer types with the high fraction of MORT negative samples and the high correlation between MORT RNA level and MORT promoter DNA methylation, where MORT likely plays a tumor suppressive role. The other 11 cancer types, with a little to no MORT silencing, might have tumor suppressive pathway, where MORT is involved, interrupted elsewhere and/or MORT may play some additional vital role in tissues these tumors originate from - e.g. prostate, thyroid, brain, testes, or ovary - since these tissues typically have the highest levels of MORT RNA [1].
Table 2.

Summary of MORT silencing in all 33 TCGA cancer types.

The cancer types with MORT silencing in a large fraction of tumor samples are indicated. Results from this study are indicated (*), results from our previous report (ref 1) are indicated (**).

AbbreviationTCGA cancer type name MORT silencing
ACCadrenocortical carcinomaNo *
BLCAbladder urothelial carcinomaYes **
BRCAbreast invasive carcinomaYes **
CESCcervical squamous cell carcinoma and endocervical adenocarcinomaYes *
CHOLcholangiocarcinomaYes *
COADcolon adenocarcinomaYes **
DLBClymphoid neoplasm diffuse large b-cell lymphomaYes **
ESCAesophageal carcinomaYes *
GBMglioblastoma multiformeNo *
HNSChead and neck squamous cell carcinomaYes **
KICHkidney chromophobeNo *
KIRCkidney renal clear cell carcinomaYes **
KIRPkidney renal papillary cell carcinomaYes **
LAMLacute myeloid leukemiaYes **
LGGbrain lower grade gliomaNo *
LIHCliver hepatocellular carcinomaYes **
LUADlung adenocarcinomaYes **
LUSClung squamous cell carcinomaYes **
MESOmesotheliomaYes *
OVovarian serous cystadenocarcinomaNo *
PAADpancreatic adenocarcinomaYes **
PCPGpheochromocytoma and paragangliomaNo *
PRADprostate adenocarcinomaNo **
READrectum adenocarcinomaYes **
SARCsarcomaYes *
SKCMskin cutaneous melanomaYes **
STADstomach adenocarcinomaYes *
TGCTtesticular germ cell tumorsNo *
THCAthyroid carcinomaNo **
THYMthymomaNo *
UCECuterine corpus endometrial carcinomaYes **
UCSuterine carcinosarcomaYes *
UVMuveal melanomaNo *

Summary of MORT silencing in all 33 TCGA cancer types.

The cancer types with MORT silencing in a large fraction of tumor samples are indicated. Results from this study are indicated (*), results from our previous report (ref 1) are indicated (**). In summary, our findings show that the MORT gene is one of the most common epigenetic aberrations seen in human cancer. Coupled together with MORT silencing occurring early in the temporal arc of human carcinogenesis it strongly supports a tumor suppressive role for MORT.

Data availability

Illumina HiSeq RNA-seq and HumanMethylation450 DNA methylation data for TCGA cancer types used in the present study can be downloaded from the GDC data portal. This brief article provides an analysis of MORT epigenetic silencing across 16 TCGA tumour types not previously reported by the authors enabling assessment across all TCGA tumour types. MORT silencing seems to  be a key early event in carcinogenesis. This indicates that further studies of MORT biology are required as well as investigation of MORT methylation as a potential biomarker. I have read this submission. I believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. STRENGTHS: The authors utilize the TCGA database to extend their previous studies on MORT that has been primarily characterized in breast cancer, but also observed to undergo silencing in 15 out of the 17 most common cancers. The current work takes this analysis deeper into the 33 TCGA cancer types and perform a more thorough analysis of the DNA methylation associated with the 16 cancer types evaluated here. SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT: -The authors make a bold statement that “the MORT gene is one of the most common epigenetic aberrations seen in human cancer”. This statement is not supported by the data presented. In order to make a statement of this level, the authors would have to provide comparisons to other documented genes that undergo a high frequency of epigenetic alteration. -This statement becomes more difficult to make when considering that several of the tumors present do not have normal counterparts for comparison. We therefore do not know if those tissue types whether the DNA methylation is abnormal or typical for the tissue type. -Authors should consider revising some of the scales on the graphs in Figure 1 to highlight the lack of methylation (for example, in testicular germ cell tumors). Similarly, the cutoff for methylation could be shown by a dotted line or similar feature. -The location of methylation relative to the MORT gene would be informative. Of the tumor types that are methylated, are the same regions methylated across types? -The authors should be cautious not to overstate their conclusions throughout the text since the conclusions are speculative without experiments to support their statements. Nevertheless, these correlations present interesting speculation and avenues for further investigations. I have read this submission. I believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. The authors present a straightforward study of DNA methylation and RNA expression of the lncRNA MORT in 16 TCGA cancer types not previously reported.  Most of the paper is clearly presented and the conclusions are reasonable.  Suggestions for improvement are presented below. 1) Statements are made regarding MORT being “one of the most common” epigenetic aberrations seen in human cancer.  No support for this statement is presented. 2) The classification of some tumor types as showing “strong” MORT silencing by DNA methylation, and other tumor types as not showing this, is arbitrary.  A quantitative definition is needed. 3) Fig 1 might be clearer if presented in two panels, subdivided by whether the quantitative definition of “strong silencing” is met.  The same is true for Table 2, which could be subdivided into two parts. 4) Since normal samples were not available for many of the tumors profiled, a more accurate statement might be “DNA methylation regulation” rather than “DNA methylation silencing,” as reduced expression in tumors as compared to normal tissues was not shown. 5) A diagram showing the MORT gene and the position of the methylation sites examined by the TCGA would be helpful. 6) Can the authors reference any data, e.g. from other publications, showing that DNA methylation actively suppresses MORT expression, by for example turning on MORT expression using treatment with a DNA methyltransferase inhibitor? 7) In the introduction, the statement “prior to or at the stage of pre-malignancy and not thereafter” is confusing, and gives the impression that MORT becomes hypomethylated, or its expression is elevated, in tumors as compared to pre-malignant lesions.  A better way to phrase this would be to say e.g. that “MORT is repressed in pre-malignant lesions and remains repressed in tumors.” 8) The final sentence in the discussion uses the wording “strongly supports” when “suggests” would be more accurate, given the absence of functional data showing tumor suppression by MORT. I have read this submission. I believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.
  9 in total

1.  Genome-wide DNA methylation profiles in progression to in situ and invasive carcinoma of the breast with impact on gene transcription and prognosis.

Authors:  Thomas Fleischer; Arnoldo Frigessi; Kevin C Johnson; Hege Edvardsen; Nizar Touleimat; Jovana Klajic; Margit Lh Riis; Vilde D Haakensen; Fredrik Wärnberg; Bjørn Naume; Aslaug Helland; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale; Jörg Tost; Brock C Christensen; Vessela N Kristensen
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 13.583

2.  Differences in DNA methylation signatures reveal multiple pathways of progression from adenoma to colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Yanxin Luo; Chao-Jen Wong; Andrew M Kaz; Slavomir Dzieciatkowski; Kelly T Carter; Shelli M Morris; Jianping Wang; Joseph E Willis; Karen W Makar; Cornelia M Ulrich; James D Lutterbaugh; Martha J Shrubsole; Wei Zheng; Sanford D Markowitz; William M Grady
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Independent prognostic Factor of low-expressed LncRNA ZNF667-AS1 for cervical cancer and inhibitory function on the proliferation of cervical cancer.

Authors:  L-P Zhao; R-H Li; D-M Han; X-Q Zhang; G-X Nian; M-X Wu; Y Feng; L Zhang; Z-G Sun
Journal:  Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.507

4.  A Molecular Portrait of High-Grade Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.

Authors:  Martin C Abba; Ting Gong; Yue Lu; Jaeho Lee; Yi Zhong; Ezequiel Lacunza; Matias Butti; Yoko Takata; Sally Gaddis; Jianjun Shen; Marcos R Estecio; Aysegul A Sahin; C Marcelo Aldaz
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Integrated genomic analysis of colorectal cancer progression reveals activation of EGFR through demethylation of the EREG promoter.

Authors:  X Qu; T Sandmann; H Frierson; L Fu; E Fuentes; K Walter; K Okrah; C Rumpel; C Moskaluk; S Lu; Y Wang; R Bourgon; E Penuel; A Pirzkall; L Amler; M R Lackner; J Tabernero; G M Hampton; O Kabbarah
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 9.867

6.  Epigenetic Silencing of MORT Is an Early Event in Cancer and Is Associated with Luminal, Receptor Positive Breast Tumor Subtypes.

Authors:  Lukas Vrba; Bernard Walter Futscher
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 3.588

7.  DNA methylation in ductal carcinoma in situ related with future development of invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Kevin C Johnson; Devin C Koestler; Thomas Fleischer; Panpan Chen; Erik G Jenson; Jonathan D Marotti; Tracy Onega; Vessela N Kristensen; Brock C Christensen
Journal:  Clin Epigenetics       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 6.551

8.  Remodeling of the methylation landscape in breast cancer metastasis.

Authors:  Marsha Reyngold; Sevin Turcan; Dilip Giri; Kasthuri Kannan; Logan A Walsh; Agnes Viale; Marija Drobnjak; Linda T Vahdat; William Lee; Timothy A Chan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A lincRNA connected to cell mortality and epigenetically-silenced in most common human cancers.

Authors:  Lukas Vrba; James C Garbe; Martha R Stampfer; Bernard W Futscher
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 4.528

  9 in total
  11 in total

1.  LncRNAMORT is upregulated in myocardial infarction and promotes the apoptosis of cardiomyocyte by downregulating miR-93.

Authors:  Jing Lv; Yi Zhu; Shanglong Yao
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 2.298

2.  Identification of a putative competitive endogenous RNA network for lung adenocarcinoma using TCGA datasets.

Authors:  Yuanyong Wang; Tong Lu; Yang Wo; Xiao Sun; Shicheng Li; Shuncheng Miao; Yanting Dong; Xiaoliang Leng; Wenjie Jiao
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  lncRNA FLVCR1-AS1 regulates cell proliferation, migration and invasion by sponging miR-485-5p in human cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Wenqing Bao; Feng Cao; Shubin Ni; Jing Yang; Haidong Li; Zhenxi Su; Bin Zhao
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 2.967

4.  Aberrant hypermethylation-mediated downregulation of antisense lncRNA ZNF667-AS1 and its sense gene ZNF667 correlate with progression and prognosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Zhiming Dong; Shengmian Li; Xuan Wu; Yunfeng Niu; Xiaoliang Liang; Liu Yang; Yanli Guo; Supeng Shen; Jia Liang; Wei Guo
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 8.469

5.  Analysis of Long Noncoding RNA ZNF667-AS1 as a Potential Biomarker for Diagnosis and Prognosis of Glioma Patients.

Authors:  Qin Yuan; Chao Gao; Xiao-Dong Lai; Liang-Yi Chen; Tian-Bao Lai
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 3.434

6.  Construction and Analysis of lncRNA-Mediated ceRNA Network in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Based on Weighted Correlation Network Analysis.

Authors:  Zhenning Zou; Shuguang Liu; Yanping Ha; Bowan Huang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-10-10       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Aberrant methylation and downregulation of ZNF667-AS1 and ZNF667 promote the malignant progression of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Wenxia Meng; Weina Cui; Lei Zhao; Weiwei Chi; Huan Cao; Baoshan Wang
Journal:  J Biomed Sci       Date:  2019-01-26       Impact factor: 8.410

8.  LncRNA MORT Inhibits Cancer Cell Proliferation and Promotes Apoptosis in Mantle Cell Lymphoma by Upregulating miRNA-16.

Authors:  Xiaoqiong Tang; Yaoying Long; Liuyue Xu; Xinyu Yan
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 3.989

9.  Long non-coding RNA mortal obligate RNA transcript inhibits the migration and invasion of colon cancer cells by inactivating transforming growth factor β1.

Authors:  Taicheng Zhou; Lili Wu; Zhen Zong; Ning Ma; Yingru Li; Zhipeng Jiang; Qirui Wang; Shuang Chen
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 2.967

10.  Genome-wide DNA methylation analysis by MethylRad and the transcriptome profiles reveal the potential cancer-related lncRNAs in colon cancer.

Authors:  Guixi Zheng; Yuzhi Zhang; Hongchun Wang; E Ding; Ailin Qu; Peng Su; Yongmei Yang; Mingjin Zou; Yi Zhang
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 4.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.