Min-Joo Ko1, Eun-Joo Jung2, Moon-Hwan Kim3, Jae-Seop Oh4. 1. Department of Rehabilitation Science, Graduate School, Inje University, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School, Inje University, Republic of Korea. 3. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Republic of Korea. 4. Department of Physical Therapy, College of Biomedical Science and Engineering, Inje University: 607 Obang-dong, Gimhae-si, Gyeongsangnam-do 621-749, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
[Purpose] This study was to investigate differences in the level of activity of the external oblique (EO), internal oblique (IO), and multifidus (MF) muscles with deep breathing in three sitting postures. [Subjects and Methods] Sixteen healthy women were recruited. The muscle activity (EO, IO, MF) of all subjects was measured in three sitting postures (slumped, thoracic upright, and lumbo-pelvic upright sitting postures) using surface electromyography. The activity of the same muscles was then remeasured in the three sitting postures during deep breathing. [Results] Deep breathing significantly increased activity in the EO, IO, and MF compared with normal breathing. Comparing postures, the activity of the MF and IO muscles was highest in the lumbo-pelvic upright sitting posture. [Conclusion] An lumbo-pelvic upright sitting posture with deep breathing could increase IO and MF muscle activity, thus improving lumbo-pelvic region stability.
[Purpose] This study was to investigate differences in the level of activity of the external oblique (EO), internal oblique (IO), and multifidus (MF) muscles with deep breathing in three sitting postures. [Subjects and Methods] Sixteen healthy women were recruited. The muscle activity (EO, IO, MF) of all subjects was measured in three sitting postures (slumped, thoracic upright, and lumbo-pelvic upright sitting postures) using surface electromyography. The activity of the same muscles was then remeasured in the three sitting postures during deep breathing. [Results] Deep breathing significantly increased activity in the EO, IO, and MF compared with normal breathing. Comparing postures, the activity of the MF and IO muscles was highest in the lumbo-pelvic upright sitting posture. [Conclusion] An lumbo-pelvic upright sitting posture with deep breathing could increase IO and MF muscle activity, thus improving lumbo-pelvic region stability.
Entities:
Keywords:
Deep breathing; Multifidus; Sitting posture
Significant changes in trunk muscle activation occur with changes in the thoracolumbar
sitting posture1). A slumped sitting
posture relies on passive lumbo-pelvic structures to maintain an upright position against
gravity. As a result, the requirement for muscle activity is reduced. Clinically, such
passive postures frequently exacerbate low back pain (LBP). The optimal sitting posture
involves a more neutral spine position, with slight lumbar lordosis and a relaxed
thorax2). Many believe that local
muscles, such as the multifidus (MF) and internal oblique (IO), are crucial for sitting
posture; they function primarily as stabilizers and have multi-segmental effects3).The abdominal muscles play a role in expiration4). Generally, no abdominal muscle activity is observed during
respiration at rest, while abdominals are activated during expiratory effort5). Maximum expiration is a training method for
co-activation of the lateral abdominal muscles6). The abdominal muscles also provide trunk stability during deep
breathing7). Therefore, the purpose of
this study was to compare the changes of MF, IO and exteranl oblique (EO) muscles according
to deep breathing in three sitting postures.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
This study enrolled 16 healthy females (mean age, 34.1 ± 13.1 years; mean height, 161.0 ±
4.2 cm; mean weight, 53.3 ± 6.0 kg). Potential subjects who had a history of lumbar spine
surgery or difficulty maintaining the sitting postures were excluded from the study. All
participants signed an informed consent form, approved by the Institutional Review Board of
Inje University (approval No: INJE 2016-10-052-001), before participating in this study.The Trigno wireless EMG system (Delsys, Inc., Boston, MA, USA) was used to measure the
electromyography (EMG) activity of the IO, EO, and MF muscles bilaterally. The sampling rate
was 1,000 Hz, with a 20–450 Hz bandpass filter. All raw EMG data were converted into root
mean square data for the analysis. The electrodes for the IO, EO, and MF were placed
according to Criswell8). The site for each
electrode was shaved and then cleaned with alcohol and cotton to reduce skin impedance. To
normalize the EMG activity of the IO, EO and MF muscles, the maximum voluntary isometric
contraction (MVIC) of these muscles was measured using maneuvers suggested previously5).The muscle activity (EO, IO, MF) of all subjects was measured in three sitting postures
(slumped, thoracic upright, and lumbo-pelvic upright sitting) using surface EMG. The
activity of the same muscles was then remeasured in the three sitting postures during deep
breathing. The deep breathing was performed with “almost maximal effort, which is equivalent
to a rating of 10 on the Borg scale”. Each sitting posture was held for 5 s and repeated
three times, with a 1-min rest between trials. The average value of the middle 3 s of the
test trials was used for the data analysis.Differences in IO, EO, and MF EMG activity among conditions were analyzed using two-way
repeated-measures analysis of variance with the Bonferroni correction. PASW Statistics
software (ver. 18.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for the statistical analyses. The
level of statistical significance was set at 0.05.
RESULTS
Regarding the activity of the EO (F=2.385, p=0.109), IO (F=1.356, p=0.290), and MF
(F=0.160, p=0.853), there was no interaction between breathing pattern and position
(F=0.830, p=0.449). However, there were significant main effects of breathing method (EO:
F=15.465, p=0.001; IO: F=31.321, p<0.000; MF: F=38.960, p<0.000) and position (IO:
F=11.137, p=0.001; MF: F=15.026, p<0.000).Comparing the sitting postures, the activity of the MF (p=0.001) and IO (p=0.001) muscles
increased significantly during lumbo-pelvic upright sitting compared with thoracic upright
sitting. In comparison of posture, there was no comparison between slump sitting and
thoracic upright sitting posture of MF (p=1.000) and IO (p=1.000) muscle activities. The
activity of the MF also increased significantly (p=0.003) during lumbo-pelvic upright
sitting compared with slumped sitting.
DISCUSSION
This study found that deep breathing produced significantly greater activity in the EO, IO,
and MF muscles than normal breathing. Comparing the sitting postures, lumbo-pelvic upright
sitting was associated with significantly greater activity of the IO and MF muscles than
thoracic upright sitting.Generally, no abdominal muscle activity is observed during respiration at rest. However,
the abdominals are activated during expiratory effort5). Our results suggest that deep breathing affects the EO, IO, and MF
muscles, which maintain an upright position during sitting. O’Sullivan et al. reported that
an lumbo-pelvic upright sitting posture results in tonic activity in the IO and MF2). The lumbar-stabilizing muscles are mainly
composed of type I fibers and only relatively low loads (approximately 30–40% MVIC) are
needed to improve their performance9). In
this study, the activity of the MF and IO was 31.52% and 29.62% MVIC, respectively, during
lumbo-pelvic upright sitting with deep breathing. Anterior pelvic rotation with neutral
lumbar lordosis results in activation of the MF and IO. The MF helps to control the
extension moment of the lumbar region and the IO restrains the pelvic position against hip
extensor momentum10). Consequently,
lumbo-pelvic upright sitting with deep breathing could be beneficial to increase MF and IO
activity and promote lumbo-pelvic region stability.The lumbo-pelvic upright sitting with deep breathing also may have implications to enhance
local muscle activities for lumbo-pelvic stabilization and to prevent lower back pain
occurred by prolonged sitting.The present study had several limitations. First, it is difficult to generalize our
findings to other populations because only healthy women were recruited for this study.
Second, lumbar lordosis was not quantified in this study. Third, none of the participants
had a history of LBP. Future studies are needed to examine the effects of deep breathing in
patients with LBP.
Authors: Peter B O'Sullivan; Kirsty M Grahamslaw; Michelle Kendell; Shaun C Lapenskie; Nina E Möller; Karen V Richards Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2002-06-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Peter B O'Sullivan; Wim Dankaerts; Angus F Burnett; Garreth T Farrell; Evonne Jefford; Clare S Naylor; Kieran J O'Sullivan Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2006-09-01 Impact factor: 3.468