Literature DB >> 29706675

A practical microwave method for the synthesis of fluoromethy 4-methylbenzenesulfonate in tert-amyl alcohol.

Kayleigh L Brocklesby1,2, Jennifer S Waby3, Christopher Cawthorne4, Graham Smith2.   

Abstract

Fluorine substitution is an established tool in medicinal chemistry to favourably alter the molecular properties of a lead compound of interest. However, gaps still exist in the library of synthetic methods for accessing certain fluorine-substituted motifs. One such area is the fluoromethyl group, particularly when required in a fluoroalkylating capacity. The cold fluorination of methylene ditosylate is under evaluated in the literature, often proceeding with low yields or harsh conditions. This report describes a novel microwave method for the rapid nucleophilic fluorination of methylene ditosylate using inexpensive reagents in good isolated yield (65%).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fluorination; Fluoromethyl tosylate; Microwave; PET; Tert-amyl alcohol

Year:  2018        PMID: 29706675      PMCID: PMC5896226          DOI: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2018.03.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tetrahedron Lett        ISSN: 0040-4039            Impact factor:   2.415


Introduction

The use of fluorine in medicinal chemistry and agrochemicals has grown rapidly in recent years, culminating in approximately one third of the top selling drugs in the world containing at least one fluorine atom. This design trend is a result of the unique properties of fluorine such as high electronegativity, high carbon–fluorine bond strength and small steric size, which enable fluorine to impart substantial changes in molecular properties such as lipophilicity/bioavailability and metabolic stability at minimal steric cost.2, 3 A further avenue of interest for fluorine is nuclear medicine, specifically Positron Emission Tomography (PET), where incorporation of cyclotron-produced fluorine-18 into radiopharmaceuticals is of widespread interest. For PET applications the stable isotope analogue is also required to enable accurate confirmation of product identity by radio-chromatographic methods. Fluoromethylation is an underexplored strategy in both medicinal chemistry and nuclear medicine, partly as a result of the complex synthetic methodology required to access the necessary structures. The alkylating fragment [18F]fluoromethyl 4-methylbenzenesulfonate (“[18F]fluoromethyl tosylate”) is well-established in radiochemistry for the automated, GMP-compatible radiosynthesis of [18F]fluoromethyl choline.5, 6 Consequently, it would be advantageous to access both the radiochemistry precursor and the stable isotope standard via the same fluoromethylation pathway to minimise synthetic effort. Fluoromethyl bromide and fluoromethyl iodide have been used in this capacity but are either a volatile greenhouse gas (FCH2Br) or are not commercially available and are troublesome to synthesise (FCH2I). Fluoromethyl tosylate is not volatile but current methods to access this reagent are typically low-yielding or use expensive reagents such as phase-transfer agents (Kryptofix K222 or 18-crown-6).7, 8 Herein, we report a method for rapid access to stable isotope fluoromethyl tosylate from inexpensive reagents to complement radiochemical methods to access [18F]fluoromethyl tosylate. A survey of the literature was carried out to identify conditions for the conversion of methylene distosyate 1 to fluoromethyl tosylate 2, with minimal formation of the by-product tosyl fluoride 3 (Scheme 1). Our efforts to replicate previously reported conditions and also independently identify suitable reaction parameters are summarised in Table 1. When the fluorination was attempted in the presence of acetonitrile and using caesium fluoride (Entry 2) this reaction gave an inadequate 5% conversion. Conversion to the by-product p-tosyl fluoride 3 was identified by 1H NMR (see ESI for the 1H NMR spectrum of 3). The use of microwave heating to effect fluoride displacement of a sulfonate by Qu and co-workers provided a rationale for our investigation in this area. Previous reports have described radiolabelling via the nucleophilic fluorination of methylene distosylate in polar aprotic solvents.7, 8 Application of these conditions to a bulk scale with greatly increased stoichiometry of the fluoride source compared to the radiolabelling reaction (Entries 4 and 5) and more polar aprotic solvents yielded a 20% conversion to tosyl fluoride 3 again, with an inadequate conversion to 2. A potential alternative strategy for fluoride displacement of an alkyl sulfonate leaving group is the use of a tertiary alcohol solvent.10, 11 Gratifyingly, application of the reaction conditions reported by Kim and co-workers (Entry 7) yielded a 100% conversion to the fluoromethyl tosylate 2. It is thought that the partial positive charge of the polar protic solvent aids the fluoride ion by increasing its nucleophilicity through weakening of the ionic cesium-fluorine bond and enhancing the leaving group ability of the tosylate group through hydrogen bonding.
Scheme 1

Fluorination of methylene ditosylate.

Table 1

Preliminary evaluation of reaction conditions for the synthesis of fluoromethyl tosyate 2a.

EntrySolventMF/catalyst (eq.)Temp (°C)Time (h)Conversion (%)b
Refs.
123
1cMeCNTBAF1100.5100This work
2cMeCNCsF1100.5955This work
3MeCNKF/K222 (1.4)110185158
4DMFCsF1202475520This work
5DMSOCsF12024100This work
6cTHFTBAF1100.51009
7dt-Amyl alcoholCsF80610010
8dt-BuOHCsF806574310

Unless otherwise stated, all reactions were carried out using 0.06 mmol of 1, 0.12 mmol of CsF, in 1 mL of the specified solvent.

Conversion determined by 1H NMR.

Microwave irradiation.

3 Equivalents of CsF were used.

Fluorination of methylene ditosylate. Preliminary evaluation of reaction conditions for the synthesis of fluoromethyl tosyate 2a. Unless otherwise stated, all reactions were carried out using 0.06 mmol of 1, 0.12 mmol of CsF, in 1 mL of the specified solvent. Conversion determined by 1H NMR. Microwave irradiation. 3 Equivalents of CsF were used. Upon identifying conditions suitable for the synthesis of fluoromethyl tosylate, attempted optimisation of the reaction as a prerequisite for larger-scale synthesis was investigated. Therefore, the effect of temperature, reaction time and excess of cesium fluoride on the conversion of 1 to fluoromethyl tosylate 2 or tosyl fluoride 3 was studied. Fig. 1 clearly demonstrates the use of one equivalent of caesium fluoride is less than satisfactory, never achieving above a 16% conversion. Although two equivalents of caesium fluoride is sufficient to achieve an average of 87% conversion after 6 h, with no traceable starting material 1, five equivalents achieves full conversion after one hour (see ESI, Table S1 for the full table). Conditions were further optimised by studying the effect of temperature and reaction duration (Table 2).
Fig. 1

Equivalent dependant conversion to 2 over time. N = 3. Reported as average with the error bars indicating standard deviation. ^No standard deviation observed for these bars.

Table 2

Microwave synthesis of 2a.

EntryTemp. (°C)Time (min)Conversion(%)b
123
18030955
280154555
39015955

Reactions conducted in 1 mL of t-amyl alcohol, using 0.06 mmol of 1 and 0.3 of CsF (n = 3).

conversion determined by 1H NMR.

Equivalent dependant conversion to 2 over time. N = 3. Reported as average with the error bars indicating standard deviation. ^No standard deviation observed for these bars. Microwave synthesis of 2a. Reactions conducted in 1 mL of t-amyl alcohol, using 0.06 mmol of 1 and 0.3 of CsF (n = 3). conversion determined by 1H NMR. Probing this nucleophilic fluorination on a larger scale afforded unexpected problems, notably a low isolated yield of 37%. Table 3 summarises different work-up conditions that were attempted in order to improve the isolated yield. As highlighted by Entry 8, the optimal work-up conditions were removal of the residual t-amyl alcohol followed by trituration of the resultant solid with diethyl ether and concentration of the filtrate to furnish fluoromethyl tosylate in 65% isolated yield.
Table 3

Scale up conditionsa (A t-amyl alcohol was removed under reduced pressure then extracted with the stated solvent. B poured onto water then extracted with the stated solvent. C solvent added to the microwave vial then sonicated to break up the reaction mixture then filtered and washed with the solvent. The filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure. D t-amyl alcohol removed under reduced pressure and the solid was triturated with the stated solvent and the filtrate concentrated under reduced pressure).

EntryWork upSolventYield 2b (%)Yield 3c (%)
1AEtOAc375
2BEt2O365
3CEtOAc385
4CEt2O882
5CCH2Cl2405
6DEtOAc605
7DCH2Cl2425
8dDEt2O653

Reactions conducted using 0.28 mmol of 1 and 1.4 mmol of CsF in 5 mL of t-amyl alcohol.

Isolated yield.

Determined by 1H NMR.

Reaction conducted with 1.4 mmol of 1, and 7 mmol of CsF in 5 mL of t-amyl alcohol.

Scale up conditionsa (A t-amyl alcohol was removed under reduced pressure then extracted with the stated solvent. B poured onto water then extracted with the stated solvent. C solvent added to the microwave vial then sonicated to break up the reaction mixture then filtered and washed with the solvent. The filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure. D t-amyl alcohol removed under reduced pressure and the solid was triturated with the stated solvent and the filtrate concentrated under reduced pressure). Reactions conducted using 0.28 mmol of 1 and 1.4 mmol of CsF in 5 mL of t-amyl alcohol. Isolated yield. Determined by 1H NMR. Reaction conducted with 1.4 mmol of 1, and 7 mmol of CsF in 5 mL of t-amyl alcohol. In summary we have reported conditions for the synthesis of fluoromethyl tosylate on a bulk scale that are superior to those previously reported. Reaction times of 15 min were achieved in the microwave using tert-amyl alcohol, obtaining a best isolated yield of 65%. These results will facilitate further adoption of this important functionality in medicinal chemistry and nuclear medicine.
  10 in total

1.  Evaluation of deuterated 18F- and 11C-labeled choline analogs for cancer detection by positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Timothy H Witney; Israt S Alam; David R Turton; Graham Smith; Laurence Carroll; Diana Brickute; Frazer J Twyman; Quang-Dé Nguyen; Giampaolo Tomasi; Ramla O Awais; Eric O Aboagye
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 2.  Fluorine-18 labelled building blocks for PET tracer synthesis.

Authors:  Dion van der Born; Anna Pees; Alex J Poot; Romano V A Orru; Albert D Windhorst; Danielle J Vugts
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 54.564

3.  A new class of SN2 reactions catalyzed by protic solvents: Facile fluorination for isotopic labeling of diagnostic molecules.

Authors:  Dong Wook Kim; Doo-Sik Ahn; Young-Ho Oh; Sungyul Lee; Hee Seup Kil; Seung Jun Oh; Sang Ju Lee; Jae Seung Kim; Jin Sook Ryu; Dae Hyuk Moon; Dae Yoon Chi
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 4.  Fluorine in pharmaceutical industry: fluorine-containing drugs introduced to the market in the last decade (2001-2011).

Authors:  Jiang Wang; María Sánchez-Roselló; José Luis Aceña; Carlos del Pozo; Alexander E Sorochinsky; Santos Fustero; Vadim A Soloshonok; Hong Liu
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 60.622

5.  Facile nucleophilic fluorination reactions using tert-alcohols as a reaction medium: significantly enhanced reactivity of alkali metal fluorides and improved selectivity.

Authors:  Dong Wook Kim; Hwan-Jeong Jeong; Seok Tae Lim; Myung-Hee Sohn; John A Katzenellenbogen; Dae Yoon Chi
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2008-01-01       Impact factor: 4.354

6.  Quick assembly of 1,4-diphenyltriazoles as probes targeting beta-amyloid aggregates in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Wenchao Qu; Mei-Ping Kung; Catherine Hou; Shunichi Oya; Hank F Kung
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 7.  Understanding organofluorine chemistry. An introduction to the C-F bond.

Authors:  David O'Hagan
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2007-10-17       Impact factor: 54.564

Review 8.  Fluorine in medicinal chemistry.

Authors:  Sophie Purser; Peter R Moore; Steve Swallow; Véronique Gouverneur
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2007-12-13       Impact factor: 54.564

9.  A fully-automated one-pot synthesis of [18F]fluoromethylcholine with reduced dimethylaminoethanol contamination via [18F]fluoromethyl tosylate.

Authors:  Melissa E Rodnick; Allen F Brooks; Brian G Hockley; Bradford D Henderson; Peter J H Scott
Journal:  Appl Radiat Isot       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 1.513

10.  Radiosynthesis and pre-clinical evaluation of [(18)F]fluoro-[1,2-(2)H(4)]choline.

Authors:  Graham Smith; Yongjun Zhao; Julius Leyton; Bo Shan; Quang-de Nguyen; Meg Perumal; David Turton; Erik Årstad; Sajinder K Luthra; Edward G Robins; Eric O Aboagye
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 2.408

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.