Literature DB >> 29706182

Prognostic Impact of Calcium Score after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Performed With New Generation Prosthesis.

Mariama Akodad1, Benoit Lattuca2, Audrey Agullo1, Jean-Christophe Macia1, Thomas Gandet3, Grégory Marin4, Anaïs Iemmi1, Hélène Vernhet5, Laurent Schmutz2, Nicolas Nagot4, Bernard Albat3, Guillaume Cayla2, Florence Leclercq6.   

Abstract

Calcium score (CS) is a well-known prognostic factor after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) performed with first generation prosthesis but few data are available concerning new generation valves. The aim of this study was to evaluate if CS remains a prognostic factor after Sapien 3 and Evolut R valves implantation. Agatston CS was evaluated on multislice computed tomography before TAVI in 346 patients implanted with Sapien XT (n = 61), CoreValve (n = 57) devices, (group 1, n = 118), and with new generation Sapien 3 (n = 147), Evolut R (n = 81) prosthesis, (group 2, n = 228). Major adverse cardiovascular events and aortic regurgitation (AR) were evaluated at 1 month. The 2 groups were similar at baseline except for logistic Euroscore (20.1% in group 1 vs 15.0 % in group 2; p = 0.001), chronic renal failure (44.1% vs 37.2% respectively, p = 0.007) and preprocedural CS (4,092 ± 2,176 vs 3,682 ± 2,109 respectively, p = 0.022). In group 1, 28 patients (23.7%) had adverse clinical events vs 21 (9.2%) in group 2 (p <0.01). In multivariate analysis, a higher CS was predictive of adverse events in group 1 (5,785 ± 3,285 vs 3,565 ± 1,331 p <0.0001) but not in group 2 (p = 0.28). A higher CS was associated with AR in group 1 (6,234 ± 2711 vs 3,429 ± 1,505; p <0.001) and in patients implanted with an Evolut R device from group 2 (4,085 ± 3,645 vs 2,551 ± 1,356; p = 0.01). In conclusion, CS appears as an important prognostic factor of major events after TAVI with first generation valves but not with new generation devices. CS remains associated with AR only with new generation self-expandable Evolut R devices.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29706182     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.02.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  6 in total

1.  Network meta-analysis of new-generation valves for transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Hisato Takagi; Yosuke Hari; Kouki Nakashima; Toshiki Kuno; Tomo Ando
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Impact of aortic valve calcification severity on device success after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Jeremy Larroche; Loïc Panh; Thibault Lhermusier; Vincent Bataille; Marie-Agnès Marachet; Thomas Chollet; Antoine Petermann; Frederic Bouisset; Nicolas Boudou; Bertrand Marcheix; Hervé Rousseau; Michel Galinier; Didier Carrié; Olivier Lairez; Yoan Lavie-Badie
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Sex Differences in the Impact of Aortic Valve Calcium Score on Mortality After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Parth P Patel; Abdallah El Sabbagh; Patrick W Johnson; Rayan Suliman; Najiyah Salwa; Andrea Carolina Morales-Lara; Peter Pollak; Mohamad Yamani; Pragnesh Parikh; Sushilkumar K Sonavane; Carolyn Landolfo; Mohamad Adnan Alkhouli; Mackram F Eleid; Mayra Guerrero; F David Fortuin; John Sweeney; Peter A Noseworthy; Rickey E Carter; Demilade Adedinsewo
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 8.589

4.  Does Aortic Valve Calcium Score Still Predict Death, Cardiovascular Outcomes, and Conductive Disturbances after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement with New-Generation Prostheses?

Authors:  Alexandre Gamet; Adeline Chatelin; Jean Mergy; Pauline Bécat; Pierre Roumegou; Luc Christiaens
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Echogr       Date:  2020-08-17

5.  Estimation of Aortic Valve Calcium Score Based on Angiographic Phase Versus Reduction of Ionizing Radiation Dose in Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Paweł Gać; Bartłomiej Kędzierski; Piotr Macek; Krystyna Pawlas; Rafał Poręba
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-23

Review 6.  Imaging Challenges in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis and Heart Failure: Did We Find a Way Out of the Labyrinth?

Authors:  Birgid Gonska; Dominik Buckert; Johannes Mörike; Dominik Scharnbeck; Johannes Kersten; Cesare Cuspidi; Wolfang Rottbauer; Marijana Tadic
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 4.241

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.