Literature DB >> 29703270

Confirmation and Identification of Salmonella spp., Cronobacter spp., and Other Gram-Negative Organisms by the Bruker MALDI Biotyper Method: Collaborative Study, First Action 2017.09.

Benjamin Bastin1, Patrick Bird1, M Joseph Benzinger1, Erin Crowley1, James Agin1, David Goins1, Daniele Sohier2, Markus Timke2, Gongyi Shi2, Markus Kostrzewa2.   

Abstract

The Bruker MALDI Biotyper® method utilizes matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) MS for the rapid and accurate identification and confirmation of Gram-negative bacteria from select media types. The alternative method was evaluated using nonselective and selective agars to identify Cronobacter spp., Salmonella spp., and select Gram-negative bacteria. Results obtained by the Bruker MALDI Biotyper were compared to the traditional biochemical methods as prescribed in the appropriate reference methods. Two collaborative studies were organized, one in the United States focusing on Cronobacter spp. and other Gram-negative bacteria, and one in Europe focusing on Salmonella spp. and other Gram-negative bacteria. Fourteen collaborators from seven laboratories located within the United States participated in the first collaborative study for Cronobacter spp. Fifteen collaborators from 15 service laboratories located within Europe participated in the second collaborative study for Salmonella spp. For each target organism (either Salmonella spp. or Cronobacter spp.), a total of 24 blind-coded isolates were evaluated. In each set of 24 organisms, there were 16 inclusivity organisms (Cronobacter spp. or Salmonella spp.) and 8 exclusivity organisms (closely related non-Cronobacter spp. and non-Salmonella spp. Gram-negative organisms). After testing was completed, the total percentage of correct identifications from each agar type for each strain was determined at a percentage of 100.0% to the genus level for the Cronobacter study and a percentage of 100.0% to the genus level for the Salmonella study. For both non-Cronobacter and non-Salmonella organisms, a percentage of 100.0% was correctly identified. The results indicated that the alternative method produced equivalent results when compared to the confirmatory procedures specified by each reference method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29703270     DOI: 10.5740/jaoacint.18-0012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J AOAC Int        ISSN: 1060-3271            Impact factor:   1.913


  4 in total

Review 1.  Methodology for laboratory-based antimicrobial resistance surveillance in animals.

Authors:  Md Al Amin; Monirul Haque Pasha; M Nazmul Hoque; Amam Zonaed Siddiki; Sukumar Saha; Md Mostofa Kamal
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2022-04-25

2.  Validation of PhageDx™Salmonella Assay in Raw Ground Turkey and Powdered Infant Formula: AOAC Performance Tested MethodSM 121904.

Authors:  Stephen Erickson; Jose Gil; Jessica Stach; Minh M Nguyen
Journal:  J AOAC Int       Date:  2021-12-11       Impact factor: 1.913

3.  Evaluation of the Thermo Scientific SureTect Salmonella Species PCR Assay in a Broad Range of Foods and Select Environmental Surfaces: Pre-Collaborative and Collaborative Study: First Action 2021.02.

Authors:  Benjamin Bastin; Wesley Thompson; M Joseph Benzinger; Erin S Crowley; Ana-Maria Leonte; Evangelos J Vandoros; Daniel Thomas; Annette Hughes; David Crabtree; Katharine Evans; Daniele Sohier
Journal:  J AOAC Int       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 1.913

4.  Validation of the One Broth One Plate for Salmonella Method for Detection of Salmonella Spp. in Select Food and Environmental Samples: AOAC Performance Tested MethodSM 102002.

Authors:  Susan Alles; Brooke Roman; Quynh-Nhi Le; Magdalena Kurteu; Ezzeddine Elmerhebi; Christopher Potter; Mark Mozola; Wesley Thompson; Benjamin Bastin; Robert Donofrio
Journal:  J AOAC Int       Date:  2021-06-12       Impact factor: 1.913

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.