| Literature DB >> 29703259 |
Dina M Metwally1,2, Ebtesam M Al-Olayan3, Mohammad Alanazi4, Sanaa B Alzahrany3, Abdelhabib Semlali4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Schistosomiasis is an acute and chronic zoonotic parasitic disease caused by trematode worms. The host inflammatory response to schistosome eggs leads to perioval granulomata formation, mainly in the liver and intestine. This study investigated the potential antischistosomal and anti-inflammatory activity of both garlic extract and allicin on liver fibrotic markers in BALB/c mice with schistosomiasis (S. mansoni infection) compared with that of the commonly used drug, praziquantel (PZQ).Entities:
Keywords: Allicin; Proinflammatory cytokines; Schistosoma mansoni
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29703259 PMCID: PMC5921551 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-018-2191-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med ISSN: 1472-6882 Impact factor: 3.659
List of primers used for real-time PCR
| Gene | Forward (F) and Reverse (R) |
|---|---|
| IL-13 | F: CGGCAGCATGGTATGGAGTG |
| R: ATTGCAATTGGAGATGTTGGTCAG | |
| (tTG) Tissue | F: GTGAGCCGTGCTATCTGTCCTG |
| Transglutaminase | R: ACTGCCTGCTTGGAACCTGAA |
| IL-1β | F: GTGCTGGCTGGCCCACA |
| R: GAACACCACTTCTCTCTTCA | |
| IL-6 | F: GGTACATCCTCGACGGCATCT |
| R: GTGAAAGCAGCAAAGAGGCACT | |
| TNF-α | F: AACCTCAGATAAGCCCGTCG |
| R: ACCACCAGCTGGTTGTCTTT | |
| GAPDH | F: TGTGTCCGTCGTGGATCTGA |
| R: TTGCTGTTGAAGTCGCAGGAG |
Comparison between the positive control (no treatment) group and the treated groups
| Number of ova/gm/group | Positive Control | Prophylaxis with garlic | Prophylaxis with Allicin | Garlic | Allicin | Praziquantel | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean Worm Burden ± SE | Male | 7.5 ± 2.06 | 6.15 ± 2.1 | 6.44 ± 2.16 | 6.24 ± 2.13 | 6.59 ± 2.21 | 6.46 ± 2.09 |
| Female | 2.8 ± 1.39 | 2.44 ± 1.20 | 2.40 ± 1.1 | 2.48 ± 1.17 | 2.55 ± 1.16 | 2.76 ± 1.25 | |
| Couple | 5.5 ± 0.97 | 3.92 ± 1.71* | 3.83 ± 1.44* | 4.02 ± 1.77* | 3.98 ± 1.59* | 3.66 ± 1.54** | |
| Total | 21.3 ± 2.35 | 16.39 ± 5.69* | 16.80 ± 5.13* | 16.64 ± 5.69* | 16.97 ± 5.28* | 16.41 ± 4.89** | |
| % Total Worm Burden Reduction | 21.91*** | 20.15*** | 21.88*** | 20.33*** | 22.33*** | ||
| Number of Ova/gm | Liver | 3223.7 ± 732.45 | 2719.25 ± 820.2 | 2770.66 ± 817.85 | 2720.14 ± 822.22 | 2771.81 ± 818.97 | 2502.39 ± 867.65 |
| Intestine | 3390.4 ± 741.58 | 3057.25 ± 871.8 | 3086.11 ± 871.69 | 3061.35 ± 877.77 | 3087.09 ± 871.69 | 2834.15 ± 908.98 | |
| % Reduction of Total Ova Count in Tissues | 11.94*** | 11.39*** | 12.59*** | 11.42*** | 19.32*** | ||
| % Egg Developmental Stages ± SE | %Immature | 54.5 ± 1.58 | 48.26 ± 10. 81 | 46.45 ± 11.11 | 47.96 ± 11.18 | 46.48 ± 11.25 | 46.06 ± 10.99 |
| %Mature | 39.4 ± 1.89 | 40.50 ± 8.97 | 40.38 ± 9.45 | 40.36 ± 9.07 | 40.52 ± 9.59 | 39.66 ± 9.42 | |
| %Dead | 6.1 ± 0.99 | 7.47 ± 2.57 | 7.88 ± 2.76 | 7.52 ± 2.71 | 8.01 ± 2.76 | 8.94 ± 3.29 | |
Values are expressed as the mean number (M) ± standard deviation (SD)
***Highly significant statistical difference from infected control mice at P < 0.001
**Statistically significant difference from infected control mice at P < 0.01
*Statistically significant difference from infected control mice at P < 0.05
Fig. 1Light microscopy of mouse livers. a Group I showing a schistosome egg surrounded by cellular infiltrate (arrows) next to bile ductal proliferation (H&E, ×1200 magnification). b Group I showing extensive fibrosis of the hepatic parenchyma with collagen fibres stained blue by Masson’s Trichrome (×1200). c Group I showing numerous schistosome eggs inside the portal vein (arrows) surrounded by inflammatory reactions and acute swelling of hepatic cells (asterik). H&E staining (×1200). d Group I showing extensive coagulative necrosis (asterisk) infiltrated by eosinophils in the hepatic parenchyma. H&E staining (×1200). e Group II showing apparently normal hepatic parenchyma. H&E staining (×1200). f Group III showing a few eggs with granuloma (arrow) surrounded by small granulomatous reactions with apparently normal hepatic parenchyma and small portal inflammatory reactions (thick arrow). H&E staining (×300). g Group IV showing a small granuloma (without an egg) containing minimal collagen deposits followed by normal hepatic parenchyma without inflammatory reactions in portal areas. H&E staining (×300). h A higher-power version of the Fig. 1g showing minimal collagen fibres and inflammatory cells without an egg in the granuloma. H&E staining (×1200). i) Group IV showing a degenerated egg surrounded by mild collagen fibres stained blue by Masson’s trichrome (×1200). j Group V showing scattered egg granulomata and inflammatory reactions in some portal areas. H&E staining (×300). k Group V showing moderate quantities of collagen fibres stained blue in the granuloma by Masson’s Trichrome (×1200). l Group VI showing small fibrocellular granulomata formed around a central dead egg and surrounded by lymphocytes, histiocytes, fibroblasts, and concentric collagen fibres (black arrow; H&E staining, ×200)
Fig. 2Percentage change in ALT (IU/L) and AST (IU/L) in all groups compared to positive control
Determination of serum biochemical parameters
| Parameter | Group | N | Min. | Max. | Mean ± S.D. | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALT (IU/L) | Positive Control | 20 | 160.00 | 170.00 | 164.00 ± 4.32 | 0.001* | |
| Pre-garlic | 20 | 33.00 | 55.00 | 43.50 ± 9.33 | 0.001* | ||
| Pre-allicin | 20 | 44.00 | 60.00 | 51.50 ± 7.72 | 0.001* | ||
| Garlic | 20 | 37.00 | 42.00 | 39.25 ± 2.22 | 0.001* | ||
| Allicin | 20 | 53.00 | 88.00 | 73.00 ± 14.58 | 0.001* | ||
| Praziquantel | 20 | 88.00 | 106.00 | 94.00 ± 8.16 | 0.001* | ||
| AST (IU/L) | Positive Control | 20 | 251.00 | 354.00 | 291.00 ± 44.77 | 0.001* | |
| Pre-garlic | 20 | 98.00 | 115.00 | 105.00 ± 7.26 | 0.001* | ||
| Pre-allicin | 20 | 97.00 | 103.00 | 100.00 ± 2.58 | 0.001* | ||
| Garlic | 20 | 90.00 | 101.00 | 94.00 ± 4.83 | 0.001* | ||
| Allicin | 20 | 92.00 | 123.00 | 107.25 ± 16.01 | 0.001* | ||
| Praziquantel | 20 | 101.00 | 138.00 | 118.25 ± 18.06 | 0.001* |
aP value between positive control group and the other groups using Dunnett’s test for multiple comparisons
bP value among all groups using one-way ANOVA
*Indicates a significant difference between the group and the positive control
Fig. 3Immunohistochemical staining for fibronectin and α-smooth muscle actin (IHC, DAB, ×200). Liver sections from: a Group II showing positive expression of fibronectin in the sinusoids as brownish material (black arrow). b Group I with S. mansoni showing a large fibrocellular bilharzial granuloma positive for fibronectin, and brownish stained collagen bundles (red arrow). Hepatocytes are also shown (black arrow). c Group III showing hepatic tissues positive for fibronectin, stained brownish (black arrow). d Group IV showing small fibrocellular granulomata, positive for fibronectin immunostaining in both granuloma (red arrow) and hepatocytes (black arrow). e Group V showing few hepatocytes positive for fibronectin immunostaining (black arrow). f Group VII with small fibrocellular granulomata, positive for fibronectin in both the granuloma (red arrow) and hepatocytes (black arrow). g Group II showing positive expression of α-smooth muscle actin in the sinusoids as brownish material (black arrow). h Group II showing a large fibrocellular bilharzial granuloma positive for α-smooth muscle actin. Collagen bundles are stained brownish (red arrow) and hepatocytes are also indicated (black). i Group III showing few hepatic cells positive for α-smooth muscle actin, stained brownish (black arrow). j Group IV showing small fibrocellular granulomata positive for α-smooth muscle actin in granuloma (red arrow). Hepatocytes are also shown (black arrow). k Group V showing few hepatocytes positive for α-smooth muscle actin (black arrow). l Group VII showing small fibrocellular granulomata positive for α-smooth muscle actin in the granuloma (red arrow). Hepatocytes are also shown (black arrow)
Fig. 4Relative cytokine mRNA expression levels after infection with S. mansoni cercariae and different therapeutic treatments