| Literature DB >> 29703200 |
Johanna Helena Kattenberg1, Annette Erhart1,2,3, Minh Hieu Truong4, Eduard Rovira-Vallbona1, Khac Anh Dung Vu4, Thi Hong Ngoc Nguyen4, Van Hong Nguyen4, Van Van Nguyen5, Melanie Bannister-Tyrrell1, Michael Theisen6, Adam Bennet7, Andrew A Lover7, Thanh Duong Tran4, Xuan Xa Nguyen4, Anna Rosanas-Urgell8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In Vietnam, malaria transmission has been reduced to very low levels over the past 20 years, and as a consequence, the country aims to eliminate malaria by 2030. This study aimed to characterize the dynamics and extent of the parasite reservoir in Central Vietnam, in order to further target elimination strategies and surveillance.Entities:
Keywords: Classification and regression tree method (CART); Low transmission; Malaria exposure; Plasmodium falciparum; Plasmodium vivax; Reservoir of infection; Sero-epidemiology; Vietnam
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29703200 PMCID: PMC5923009 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-018-2326-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malar J ISSN: 1475-2875 Impact factor: 2.979
Fig. 1Map of Provinces in Vietnam, with Quang Nam Province and Nam Tra My district and participating households in Trà Cang commune as insets. Green dots are households within Xe Xua village; orange dots are households within Tak Lang village; blue dots are households within Tu Nak village, which is separated in a west (dark blue) and east (light blue) area, where the commune health centre is located as well
Fig. 2Monthly number of Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax confirmed cases and monthly rainfall between 2005–2015 in Nam Tra My district (a, b) and Trà Cang (c, d)
Fig. 3Annual incidence rates of Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax confirmed cases per 1000 persons per year at risk at the health centres in Nam Tra My district (a) and Trà Cang (b)
Characteristics of participants at the census and surveys in Trà Cang commune
| Description | Census | S1 | S2 | S3 | S4 | S5 | S6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Months | Aug/Sept 2014 | Nov 2014 | Jan 2015 | Mar 2015 | May 2015 | July 2015 | Nov/Dec 2015 |
| No. surveyed | 441 (100%) | 347 (78.7%) | 358 (81.2%) | 295 (66.9%) | 296 (67.1%) | 280 (63.5%) | 323 (73.2%) |
| Village, n (%) | |||||||
| Tu Nak | 209 (47.4%) | 149 (42.9%) | 160 (44.7%) | 126 (42.7%) | 141 (47.6%) | 134 (47.9%) | 152 (54.3%) |
| Xe Xua | 189 (42.9%) | 161 (49.3%) | 167 (49.3%) | 146 (49.5%) | 132 (44.6%) | 114 (40.7%) | 138 (49.3%) |
| Tak Lang | 43 (9.8%) | 7 (10.7%) | 31 (8.7%) | 23 (7.8%) | 23 (7.8%) | 32 (11.4%) | 33 (11.8%) |
| Agegroups (years) | |||||||
| 0.5–5 | 76 (17.2%) | 73 (21.0%) | 76 (21.2%) | 72 (24.4%) | 63 (21.3%) | 69 (24.6%) | 78 (24.2%) |
| 6–20 | 188 (42.6%) | 136 (39.2%) | 142 (39.7%) | 98 (33.2%) | 132 (44.6%) | 105 (37.5%) | 121 (37.5%) |
| 21–40 | 116 (26.3%) | 88 (25.4%) | 88 (24.6%) | 80 (27.1%) | 59 (19.9%) | 64 (22.9%) | 77 (23.8%) |
| 41–60 | 43 (9.8%) | 36 (10.4%) | 38 (10.6%) | 30 (10.2%) | 29 (9.8%) | 29 (10.4%) | 34 (10.5%) |
| > 60 | 18 (4.1%) | 14 (4.0%) | 14 (3.9%) | 15 (5.1%) | 13 (4.4%) | 13 (4.6%) | 13 (4.0%) |
| Males, (%) | 237 (53.7%) | 176 (50.7%) | 181 (50.6%) | 143 (48.5%) | 143 (48.3%) | 134 (47.9%) | 163 (50.5%) |
| Occupation, n (%) | |||||||
| Farmer | 199 (45.1%) | ||||||
| School | 160 (36.3%) | ||||||
| Other | 82 (18.6%) | ||||||
| Bednet use in previous month (%) | |||||||
| Always using bednet | 85.3 | 80.5 | 82.4 | 88.9 | 93.2 | 90.1 | |
| Never using bednet | 5.8 | 7.5 | 8.5 | 5.7 | 5.7 | 4.3 | |
| Bednet-users using LLIN | 100.0 | 98.5 | 100.0 | 99.7 | 100.0 | 93.2 | |
| Forest fields in previous month (%) | |||||||
| Proportion that worked in field | 18.2 | 56.7 | 59.7 | 74.0 | 71.4 | 53.3 | |
| Slept in field | 10.7 | 12.3 | 16.6 | 27.0 | 26.1 | 3.7 | |
| Deep forest activities | 8.6 | 10.1 | 4.8 | 0.3 | 7.5 | 9.3 | |
| Slept in deep forest | 1.4 | 0.8 | 1.4 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.3 | |
| Slept in other village in previous month | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 8.1 | |
| Fever (%) | |||||||
| Reported fever in previous month | 7.5 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| Measured fever at survey | 11.0 | 1.4 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 2.1 | 0.0 | |
Microscopy and qPCR detected Plasmodium spp. infections per village across the six surveys in the study population in Trà Cang commune
| Village | Survey 1 | Survey 2 | Survey 3 | Survey 4 | Survey 5 | Survey 6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tak Lang | 0/37 | 0/31 | 0/23 | 0/23 | 0/32 | 0/33 |
| Tu Nak | 1 PV/149a | 0/160 | 0/126 | 0/141 | 0/104 | 0/152 |
| Xe Xua | 1 PF/161a | 1 PV/167bd | 0/146 | 1 PF/132c | 0/114 | 0/138 |
| Total | 2/347 | 1/358 | 0/295 | 1/296 | 0/280 | 0/323 |
PV, P. vivax; PF, P. falciparum
aDetected by qPCR and light microscopy
bDetected by light microscopy only
cDetected by qPCR only
dOne RDT positive detected (but negative by light microscopy and qPCR)
Fig. 4Plasmodium falciparum (red) and Plasmodium vivax (blue) seroprevalence in individuals participating at survey 1 (S1) and at survey 6 (S6) in different hamlets. Error bars show 95% confidence intervals for the estimated proportions. Seropositivity was defined as being in CART category 2, 3 or 4
Fig. 5Reversible catalytic model of Plasmodium falciparum (red) and Plasmodium vivax (blue) seroprevalence versus age in individuals participating at survey 1 and at survey 6 using two seroconversion rates (λ) and seroreversion rate (ρ) estimated at maximum likelihood. Dots represents calculated seroprevalence in 5-years age groups for ages up to 55, and one average for all ages above 55 and are plotted at the median age of the age group
Predictive factors of seropositivity against any species of malaria parasites (Plasmodium falciparum and/or Plasmodium vivax) in the study area at survey 1 and survey 6
| Seropositivity S1 | Seropositivity S6 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proportion (%) | aOR | 95% CI | p value | Proportion (%) | aOR | 95% CI | p value | |
| Village |
| 0.7022 | ||||||
| Xe Xua | 56.9 | 1.00 | 51.6 | 1.00 | ||||
| Tu Nak | 40.4 | 432.80 | [0.5–403,860] | 56.9 | 1.12 | [0.6–2.2] | ||
| Tak Lang | 44.4 | 0.02 | [0.001–0.6] | 31.3 | 0.70 | [0.2–2.1] | ||
| Age group (years) |
|
| ||||||
| 0.5–10 | 18.8 | 1.00 | 26.7 | 1.00 | ||||
| 11–25 | 47.1 | 1.99 | [0.8–5] | 46.7 | 1.31 | [0.5–3.3] | ||
| > 25 | 87.9 | 17.38 | [5–58] | 92.6 | 16.96 | [4.0–71.2] | ||
| Occupation |
| 0.1167 | ||||||
| School | 33.9 | 1.00 | 33.0 | 1.00 | ||||
| Farmer | 78.2 | 1.83 | [0.7–5] | 86.0 | 2.01 | [0.6–6.6] | ||
| Other | 7.7 | 0.13 | [0.04–0.4] | 24.3 | 0.54 | [0.2–1.2] | ||
| Main material of roof | 0.738 | NS | ||||||
| Leaves | 36.4 | 1.00 | ||||||
| Aluminium (tole) | 50.3 | 1.09 | [0.7–2] | |||||
| Education | 0.95 | [0.8–1.1] | 0.477 | NS | ||||
| Household | 1.04 | [1.0–1.1] |
| NS | ||||
| House structure | NS |
| ||||||
| On ground | 82.4 | 1.00 | ||||||
| On stilts | 48.1 | 0.24 | [0.1–0.7] | |||||
| Nr of buffaloes owned | NS | 0.63 | [0.4–0.9] |
| ||||
| Total number of bednets in the household | NS | 0.72 | [0.5–1.0] | 0.051 | ||||
| Total number of nights spent in the field | NA | 1.00 | [1.0–1.0] | 0.854 | ||||
| Working in the forest during the study | NA | 0.55 | [0.2–1.5] | 0.255 | ||||
| Total number of nights spent in the forest | NA | 1.93 | [0.6–6.5] | 0.286 | ||||
| Having slept in another cluster during the study | NA | 0.98 | [0.3–3.1] | 0.973 | ||||
Italic values indicate significant p values
NS not significant in univariate analysis, therefore not included in multivariate model; NA variable measured during survey, therefore not relevant for seropositivity at survey 1
Predictive factors of recent exposure to Plasmodium falciparum and/or Plasmodium vivax in the study area between survey 1 and survey 6
| Exposure any species (N = 301) | Exposure | Exposure | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proportion (%) | aOR | 95% CI | p value | Proportion (%) | aOR | 95% CI | p value | Proportion (%) | aOR | 95% CI | p value | |
| Village |
| NS | 0.057 | |||||||||
| Xe Xua | 11.0 | 1.00 | 7.1 | 7.2 | 1.00 | |||||||
| Tak Lang | 6.3 | 1.14 | [0.2–5.9] | 6.3 | 0.0 | 8.1E−07 | ||||||
| Tu Nak west | 30.0 | 5.07 | [1.8–14.1] | 12.0 | 21.2 | 3.64 | [1.2–11.2] | |||||
| Tu Nak east | 12.0 | 0.96 | [0.3–2.7] | 17.3 | 5.3 | 0.87 | [0.2–3.2] | |||||
| Age group (years) |
|
| 0.163 | |||||||||
| 6–20a | 7.8 | 1.00 | 0.9 | 1.00 | 6.8 | 1.00 | ||||||
| 0.5–5 | 4.2 | 0.25 | [0.01–4.5] | 0.0 | 2.58E−06 | 3.9 | 0.54 | [0.1–2.3] | ||||
| 21–40 | 16.7 | 6.17 | [0.5–81.2] | 9.7 | 28.38 | [0.1–11,511] | 6.6 | 1.29 | [0.3–5.2] | |||
| 41–60 | 41.4 | 15.83 | [1.1–231] | 41.4 | 138.0 | [0.3–59,721] | 16.7 | 2.21 | [0.5–10.1] | |||
| 61–90 | 46.2 | 12.73 | [0.9–181] | 46.2 | 174.2 | [0.4–79,207] | 30.8 | 4.51 | [1.0–20.8] | |||
| Occupation | 0.441 | 0.973 | NS | |||||||||
| School | 7.3 | 1.00 | 0.9 | 1.00 | 6.4 | |||||||
| Farmer | 24.6 | 0.52 | [0.04–6.7] | 20.2 | 0.49 | [0.001–198] | 11.9 | |||||
| Other | 7.2 | 2.85 | [0.2–42.1] | 1.4 | 0.49 | [0.001–362] | 5.4 | |||||
| House structure |
|
| NS | |||||||||
| On ground | 28.1 | 1.00 | 21.2 | 1.00 | 11.4 | |||||||
| On stilts | 12.3 | 0.34 | [0.1–1.0] | 7.1 | 0.23 | [0.1–0.9] | 7.5 | |||||
| Reported bednet use |
|
| NS | |||||||||
| Always | 7.8 | 1.00 | 3.6 | 1.00 | 5.1 | |||||||
| Sometimes | 21.5 | 3.20 | [1.4–7.1] | 14.8 | 5.25 | [1.7–16.4] | 11.7 | |||||
| Total number of nights spent in the field | 1.02 | [1.0–1.1] | 0.173 | 1.02 | [0.98–1.1] | 0.268 | 1.03 | [1.0–1.1] | 0.095 | |||
| Working in the field during the study | NS | NS | 0.41 | [0.1–1.4] | 0.158 | |||||||
| Number of surveys attended | NS | NS | 1.56 | [0.9–2.7] | 0.111 | |||||||
| Proportion of bednets in the household | NS | NS | 0.05 | [0.0–1.5] | 0.086 | |||||||
Italic values indicate significant p values
NS not significant in univariate analysis, therefore not included in multivariate model
aThe age group of 6–20 years old was used as the reference group as it contained the largest number of individuals
Fig. 6Households with a Plasmodium falciparum- and b Plasmodium vivax-exposed individuals (red) and non-exposed individuals (blue) in the study hamlets and c Plasmodium vivax-exposed individuals (red) and non-exposed individuals (blue) in Tu Nak village. A hotspot of high rate of P. vivax exposed individuals (yellow circle; RR = 6.57, p = 0.006) within TuNak village was identified using SatScan spatial analysis searching the whole area for high and low rates of exposure using the Bernoulli model. No other significant hotspots or cold spots were identified for either species