| Literature DB >> 29702580 |
Shulin Fu1,2, Huashan Liu3,4, Xiao Chen5,6, Yinsheng Qiu7,8, Chun Ye9,10, Yu Liu11,12, Zhongyuan Wu13,14, Ling Guo15,16, Yongqing Hou17,18, Chien-An Andy Hu19,20.
Abstract
Haemophilus parasuis (H. parasuis) can cause Glässer’s disease in pigs. However, the molecular mechanism of the inflammation response induced by H. parasuis remains unclear. The high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) protein is related to the pathogenesis of various infectious pathogens, but little is known about whether H. parasuis can induce the release of HMGB1 in piglet peripheral blood monocytes. Baicalin displays important anti-inflammatory and anti-microbial activities. In the present study, we investigated whether H. parasuis can trigger the secretion of HMGB1 in piglet peripheral blood monocytes and the anti-inflammatory effect of baicalin on the production of HMGB1 in peripheral blood monocytes induced by H. parasuis during the inflammation response. In addition, host cell responses stimulated by H. parasuis were determined with RNA-Seq. The RNA-Seq results showed that H. parasuis infection provokes the expression of cytokines and the activation of numerous pathways. In addition, baicalin significantly reduced the release of HMGB1 in peripheral blood monocytes induced by H. parasuis. Taken together, our study showed that H. parasuis can induce the release of HMGB1 and baicalin can inhibit HMGB1 secretion in an H. parasuis-induced peripheral blood monocytes model, which may provide a new strategy for preventing the inflammatory disorders induced by H. parasuis.Entities:
Keywords: HMGB1; Haemophilus parasuis; RNA-Seq; baicalin; inflammation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29702580 PMCID: PMC5983759 DOI: 10.3390/ijms19051307
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Detection of high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) release in the piglet peripheral blood monocytes triggered by H. parasuis or lipopolysaccharide (LPS) using the real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) method (A) and Western blot method (B). * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; HPS: H. parasuis; 36 h: LPS vs. Control (p < 0.01) and HPS vs. Control (p < 0.01); 48 h: LPS vs. Control (p < 0.01) and HPS vs. Control (p < 0.05).
Figure 2The effect of baicalin on HMGB1 release in piglet peripheral blood monocytes induced by H. parasuis. 1 × 106 piglet peripheral blood monocytes were pretreated with baicalin at 12.5, 25, 50, 100 μg/mL or NAC (1 mM/mL) for 1 h. 1 × 106 CFU/mL H. parasuis were added to the wells and co-infected for 24, 36 and 48 h. The HMGB1 concentration was measured. ## p < 0.01 vs. control. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; HPS: H. parasuis.
Figure 3The effect of LPS on HMGB1 release in the piglet model. The piglets were inoculated with LPS for 3, 6, 9, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 72 h, blood samples were collected for the detection of HMGB1 release. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.
Statistical summary analysis of RNA-seq datasets of infection cells and control cells.
| Samples_ID | All Reads | Mapped Reads | Mapped Pair Reads | Mapped Broken-Pair Reads | Mapped Unique Reads | Mapped Multi Reads | Mapping Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H1 | 55,854,342 | 44,980,513 | 40,035,218 | 4,945,295 | 43,121,932 | 1,858,581 | 80.53% |
| H2 | 54,986,838 | 44,145,405 | 39,108,774 | 5,036,631 | 42,172,615 | 1,972,790 | 80.28% |
| H3 | 50,658,012 | 40,793,438 | 36,277,250 | 4,516,188 | 39,182,384 | 1,611,054 | 80.53% |
| K1 | 61,627,718 | 49,131,998 | 43,393,550 | 5,738,448 | 46,888,148 | 2,243,850 | 79.72% |
| K2 | 55,917,120 | 44,938,810 | 39,598,978 | 5,339,832 | 42,736,227 | 2,202,583 | 80.37% |
| K3 | 54,216,750 | 43,563,887 | 38,251,636 | 5,312,251 | 41,401,511 | 2,162,376 | 80.35% |
H1, H2, H3: the infected cells; K1, K2, K3: the control cells.
Figure 4Analysis of the top 30 pathway enrichment (A) and gene ontology (GO) enrichment (B) by RNA-Seq.
Figure 5Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes/Proteins (STRING) analysis of the relationship between 12 choosed DEGs.
Figure 6Relative quantification of DEGs for verification by RT-PCR. RT-PCR relative expression levels of selected genes were chosen for the cells infected for 24 h.
Primers for qRT-PCR.
| Gene | Nucleotide Sequence (5′–3′) | |
|---|---|---|
|
| Forward | TGCGGGACATCAAGGAGAAG |
| Reverse | AGTTGAAGGTGGTCTCGTGG | |
|
| Forward | ATGCCCAGTTTTCTACGGGG |
| Reverse | CCGGGCACTTGCTTTAGAGA | |
|
| Forward | CACTGCCTAGTGCCAAGGAT |
| Reverse | CCCACGTTCGCTACACTTCT | |
|
| Forward | CATCCCTTGGATGTCAGGCA |
| Reverse | AAACTGGATATCGCTGGGGC | |
|
| Forward | TGTTGACCACAGGGAGGGTA |
| Reverse | TGGATCCACATTGCATGGCT | |
|
| Forward | CCTCCATGGTCTCTTTGGGC |
| Reverse | GGCGGTGGCCAACTTTTACT | |
|
| Forward | GCCATTGATGCAAGCCTGAC |
| Reverse | ATAGCCTTTGTTGCCCCAGT | |
|
| Forward | AACAGCCCGTGTCAACATGA |
| Reverse | GTGGAAAGGTGTGGAATGCG | |
|
| Forward | CCCCGTGTCTAATAGGGGAG |
| Reverse | ATCCAAGGGGCCAGAAACTG | |
|
| Forward | TGTACTGTGCACCCCTCAAG |
| Reverse | AACTCGTGCAGAGCAAAGGAT | |
|
| Forward | CTTCACATACACCGTGCGGA |
| Reverse | AGACCTGCCTGCCCTTTTTG | |