Literature DB >> 29701973

Conformal Regression for Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Modeling-Quantifying Prediction Uncertainty.

Fredrik Svensson1,2, Natalia Aniceto1, Ulf Norinder3,4, Isidro Cortes-Ciriano1, Ola Spjuth5, Lars Carlsson6,7, Andreas Bender1.   

Abstract

Making predictions with an associated confidence is highly desirable as it facilitates decision making and resource prioritization. Conformal regression is a machine learning framework that allows the user to define the required confidence and delivers predictions that are guaranteed to be correct to the selected extent. In this study, we apply conformal regression to model molecular properties and bioactivity values and investigate different ways to scale the resultant prediction intervals to create as efficient (i.e., narrow) regressors as possible. Different algorithms to estimate the prediction uncertainty were used to normalize the prediction ranges, and the different approaches were evaluated on 29 publicly available data sets. Our results show that the most efficient conformal regressors are obtained when using the natural exponential of the ensemble standard deviation from the underlying random forest to scale the prediction intervals, but other approaches were almost as efficient. This approach afforded an average prediction range of 1.65 pIC50 units at the 80% confidence level when applied to bioactivity modeling. The choice of nonconformity function has a pronounced impact on the average prediction range with a difference of close to one log unit in bioactivity between the tightest and widest prediction range. Overall, conformal regression is a robust approach to generate bioactivity predictions with associated confidence.

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29701973     DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  7 in total

1.  Ranking-Oriented Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Modeling Combined with Assay-Wise Data Integration.

Authors:  Katsuhisa Matsumoto; Tomoyuki Miyao; Kimito Funatsu
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2021-04-28

2.  QSAR-derived affinity fingerprints (part 1): fingerprint construction and modeling performance for similarity searching, bioactivity classification and scaffold hopping.

Authors:  C Škuta; I Cortés-Ciriano; W Dehaen; P Kříž; G J P van Westen; I V Tetko; A Bender; D Svozil
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 5.514

3.  KnowTox: pipeline and case study for confident prediction of potential toxic effects of compounds in early phases of development.

Authors:  Andrea Morger; Miriam Mathea; Janosch H Achenbach; Antje Wolf; Roland Buesen; Klaus-Juergen Schleifer; Robert Landsiedel; Andrea Volkamer
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 5.514

4.  Studying and mitigating the effects of data drifts on ML model performance at the example of chemical toxicity data.

Authors:  Andrea Morger; Marina Garcia de Lomana; Ulf Norinder; Fredrik Svensson; Johannes Kirchmair; Miriam Mathea; Andrea Volkamer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  ChemBioSim: Enhancing Conformal Prediction of In Vivo Toxicity by Use of Predicted Bioactivities.

Authors:  Marina Garcia de Lomana; Andrea Morger; Ulf Norinder; Roland Buesen; Robert Landsiedel; Andrea Volkamer; Johannes Kirchmair; Miriam Mathea
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 4.956

6.  Machine Learning Strategies When Transitioning between Biological Assays.

Authors:  Staffan Arvidsson McShane; Ernst Ahlberg; Tobias Noeske; Ola Spjuth
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  Changing the HTS Paradigm: AI-Driven Iterative Screening for Hit Finding.

Authors:  Gabriel H S Dreiman; Magda Bictash; Paul V Fish; Lewis Griffin; Fredrik Svensson
Journal:  SLAS Discov       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 3.341

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.