| Literature DB >> 29701651 |
Yaming Wang1, Guangxin Wang2, Zhi Lu3, Wuhui Li4, Yanfu Yan5, Yongfa Song6, Osaka Akiyoshi7,8.
Abstract
Titanium and its alloys are frequently employed in medical and dental clinics due to their good tissue compatibility, including commercially available pure Ti, Ti6A4V, or Ti-15Zr-4Ta-4Nb. Yet, they may behave very differently when in contact with our plasma because of their own chemical composition. The present study was designed to compare the in vitro behavior of highly pure Ti (>99.99%; hpTi) with those of the above titanium specimens when they were subjected to heating in air (HT), H₂O₂ and heating (CHT), and heating in air after forming grooves on the surface (GT). Since one of the measures of material-tissue compatibility has been in vitro apatite formation in artificial plasma, like simulated body fluid (SBF) of the Kokubo recipe, the apatite deposition in SBF on their surface and in their grooves were examined in terms of the X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, and energy dispersion X-ray analysis. The results showed that hpTi was as active in in vitro apatite deposition as the other reference titanium samples mentioned above. Moreover, GT specimens of hpTi induced apatite deposition on the platform of the grooves as well as in the grooves. Therefore, hpTi was concluded to have better activity, and to be clinically applicable.Entities:
Keywords: high-purity titanium biological activity; inhibitory effect; microstructure; nucleation and growth of apatite; rutile titanium dioxide
Year: 2018 PMID: 29701651 PMCID: PMC5978052 DOI: 10.3390/ma11050675
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Basic element content of high purity Titanium (99.99%).
| Element | Ti | Al | P | V | Cr | Fe | Ni | Cu | Zn |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| content (ppm) | substrate | 4.577 | 4.540 | 1.122 | 3.992 | 200.113 | 14.541 | 2.329 | 1.166 |
Different chemical/heat treatments of specimens.
| Sample | Size (mm3) | Treatment Method | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type A | CHT | 10 × 20 × 1 | Chemically treated with 30% wt H2O2 at 80 °C for 3 h, then heated at 400 °C for 1 h |
| HT | Heated at 400 °C for 5 h covered with 50 µm Na2O∙2B2O3 powder | ||
| Type B | GT | 10 × 10 × 3 | Machined micro-grooves of 50 µm both in depth and in width, then heated at 600 °C for 5 h |
Figure 1Schematic diagram of the sample setting, where a pair of the specimens was held together at four corners with 0.3 mm copper wires in diameter. A 0.3 mm gap between the two specimens was formed, and the opposing surfaces were denoted as contact surfaces [9].
Figure 2XRD patterns of different specimens: pure Ti, CHT, HT, and GT (T: Titanium; □: Anatase; ♦: Rutile; •: Ti4O7).
Figure 3SEM on surface of GT: (a) No apatite on surface of pure titanium after soaking in SBF for five days; (b) Rutile crystals on surface of GT after heat treatment at 600 °C for 5 h; (c) Apatite on surface of GT after soaking in SBF for five days (pH 7.4, 36.5 °C).
Figure 4EDS of different point on surface layer of GT (a) EDS of point R on surface layer of GT; (b) EDS of point A on surface layer of GT (R: rutile-type titania substrate; A: apatite).
Figure 5SEM micrographs of surface layer of pure titanium and GT after immersion in SBF at 37 °C for different days ((a) pure titanium immersed for 15 days; GT immersed for (b) 5 days; (c) 14 days; (d) dense apatite particles in the platform (P) and on the grooves (G); 14 days in SBF).
Figure 6XRD patterns of GT before (control) and after immersion in SBF at 37 °C for 5 and 14 days.
Figure 7SEM photographs and EDS of HT after soaking in SBF for five days: (a) surface morphology of HT before soaking in SBF; (b)surface morphology of HT after soaking in SBF for five days; (c) surface morphology of copper wire; (d) EDS of point P on surface layer of HT.
Figure 8Color change: (i) without copper wire; (ii) with copper wire.