Literature DB >> 11359261

A prospective multicenter clinical trial comparing one- and two-stage titanium screw-shaped fixtures with one-stage plasma-sprayed solid-screw fixtures.

W Becker1, B E Becker, A Ricci, O Bahat, E Rosenberg, L F Rose, M Handelsman, H Israelson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Brånemark fixtures were originally placed in two stages, whereas titanium plasma-sprayed (TPS) solid-screws are placed in one stage. Long-term survival rates for both types of implants are excellent. Excellent survival rates have also been reported for machined screw-shaped (MS) titanium implants placed in one stage. A small number of studies have compared different implant systems and methods of implant placement.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to report clinical outcomes from a prospective longitudinal, multicenter study comparing Brånemark MS fixtures (Nobel Biocare, Yorba Linda, California, USA) placed in either one or two stages with a one-stage TPS system (ITI Straumann, Waldenburg, Switzerland).
METHODS: A protocol was designed to compare implant survival rates, changes in crestal bone for titanium MS fixtures placed in one and two stages, and plasma-sprayed solid-screw fixtures placed in one surgical stage. Twenty-nine patients ranging in age from 24 to 82 years received MS fixtures in one stage. The average age for males was 58 years (n = 11), whereas the ages for females (n = 18) ranged from 15 to 84 years (average 58 years). Twenty-nine patients received machined titanium fixtures placed in two stages. There were 20 females ranging in age from 23 to 74 years (average 54 years) and 9 females ranging from 24 to 74 years (average 46 years). Twenty-five patients received TPS fixtures. There were 15 males, ranging in age from 57 to 79 (average 70), and 10 females, ranging in age from 40 to 83 years (average 62 years). Bone quality and quantity were determined from radiographs and during site preparation. Patient age, sex, location of implant placement according to jaw, length of fixtures, and number of lost fixtures were entered onto computer code sheets and continuously entered into a locked computer system. For one- and two-stage MS fixtures, nonstandardized periapical radiographs were taken at abutment connection and follow-up. Solid screws were x-rayed at prostheses connection and follow-up. The average time between implant restoration and radiographic follow-up was 15 months. The x-rays were scanned into a computer, and a program designed to measure radiographs was used to determine changes in crestal bone. Measurements for one- and two-stage MS fixtures were made from the top of the implant shoulder to the first bone to implant contact mesial and distally. Plasma-sprayed screws were measured from the bottom of the implant to the coronal most bone to implant contacts mesial and distally. Mesial-distal radiographic measurements were averaged and changes were compared using the t-test for related samples.
RESULTS: This report presents data from the 2- to 3-year follow-up examinations. Twenty-nine patients received 80 one-stage MS fixtures. Between 0 and 1 year, two fixtures were lost, resulting in a 97.5% cumulative survival rate (CSR). The CSR remained unchanged through the 2- to 3-year follow-up. Twenty-eight patients received 78 two-stage MS fixtures. One implant was lost prior to loading and two were lost between 0- and 1-year follow-up, yielding a 96.2% CSR at the end of 1 year. The CSR remained unchanged through the 2- to 3-year follow-up. Twenty-three patients received 78 solid-screw plasma-sprayed screws. One implant was lost prior to loading and one between the 0- to 1-year follow-up, accounting for a 97.4% CSR at the 2- to 3-year follow-up. Changes in bone crest measurements for one-stage titanium threaded fixtures were insignificant (-0.11 mm, p = .08, maxillary; 0.07 mm, p = .42, mandibular). For two-stage MS fixtures, crestal bone loss was insignificant in maxillae (-0.16 mm, p = .92) and significant in mandibles (-0.43 mm, p = .000). There was significant bone loss for TPS implants in maxillae and mandibles (maxillae, 1.31 mm, p = .04; mandibles, 0.98 mm, p = .000).
CONCLUSIONS: Cumulative survival rates for MS fixtures placed in one and two stages as well as one-stage TPS screws up to the 2- to 3-year follow-up examination were similar, indicating excellent clinical results. Radiographic measurements for changes in crestal bone loss were clinically insignificant for fixtures placed in one stage. For two-stage fixtures, maxillary changes were insignificant, whereas mandibular bone loss was statistically significant but clinically insignificant. Changes in crestal bone loss for TPS implants were statistically significant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11359261     DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2000.tb00007.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res        ISSN: 1523-0899            Impact factor:   3.932


  13 in total

1.  Enhanced cell integration to titanium alloy by surface treatment with microarc oxidation: a pilot study.

Authors:  Young Wook Lim; Soon Yong Kwon; Doo Hoon Sun; Hyoun Ee Kim; Yong Sik Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Enhancing osseointegration of titanium implants through large-grit sandblasting combined with micro-arc oxidation surface modification.

Authors:  Wulin He; Xing Yin; Li Xie; Zeping Liu; Jingtao Li; Shujuan Zou; Jianwei Chen
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 3.  Nanomaterials and synergistic low-intensity direct current (LIDC) stimulation technology for orthopedic implantable medical devices.

Authors:  Rohan A Shirwaiker; Meghan E Samberg; Paul H Cohen; Richard A Wysk; Nancy A Monteiro-Riviere
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2013-01-17

4.  Alveolar bone regeneration for immediate implant placement using an injectable bone substitute: an experimental study in dogs.

Authors:  Damien Boix; Olivier Gauthier; Jérôme Guicheux; Paul Pilet; Pierre Weiss; Gaël Grimandi; Guy Daculsi
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 6.993

5.  Implant-retained craniofacial prostheses for facial defects.

Authors:  Philipp A Federspil
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-03-10

Review 6.  Immediate placement of endosseous implants into the extraction sockets.

Authors:  Vijay Ebenezer; K Balakrishnan; R Vigil Dev Asir; Banu Sragunar
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2015-04

7.  Effects of Pre-Treatments on Bioactivity of High-Purity Titanium.

Authors:  Yaming Wang; Guangxin Wang; Zhi Lu; Wuhui Li; Yanfu Yan; Yongfa Song; Osaka Akiyoshi
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 8.  Nanomodified Peek Dental Implants: Bioactive Composites and Surface Modification-A Review.

Authors:  Shariq Najeeb; Zohaib Khurshid; Jukka Pekka Matinlinna; Fahad Siddiqui; Mohammad Zakaria Nassani; Kusai Baroudi
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2015-10-01

9.  Surface properties and osteoblastic cytocompatibility of two blasted and Acid-etched titanium implant systems with distinct microtopography.

Authors:  Pedro Mesquita; Pedro de Sousa Gomes; Paula Sampaio; Gintaras Juodzbalys; Américo Afonso; Maria Helena Fernandes
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2012-04-01

Review 10.  Effectiveness of Antibacterial Surfaces in Osseointegration of Titanium Dental Implants: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Nansi López-Valverde; Bruno Macedo-de-Sousa; Antonio López-Valverde; Juan Manuel Ramírez
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.