Literature DB >> 29700964

Refractive regression after laser in situ keratomileusis.

Mabel K Yan1, John Sm Chang2,3, Tommy Cy Chan2,3.   

Abstract

Uncorrected refractive errors are a leading cause of visual impairment across the world. In today's society, laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) has become the most commonly performed surgical procedure to correct refractive errors. However, regression of the initially achieved refractive correction has been a widely observed phenomenon following LASIK since its inception more than two decades ago. Despite technological advances in laser refractive surgery and various proposed management strategies, post-LASIK regression is still frequently observed and has significant implications for the long-term visual performance and quality of life of patients. This review explores the mechanism of refractive regression after both myopic and hyperopic LASIK, predisposing risk factors and its clinical course. In addition, current preventative strategies and therapies are also reviewed.
© 2018 Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Ophthalmologists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  LASIK; laser in situ keratomileusis; refractive surgery; regression

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29700964     DOI: 10.1111/ceo.13315

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1442-6404            Impact factor:   4.207


  8 in total

1.  Machine learning predicting myopic regression after corneal refractive surgery using preoperative data and fundus photography.

Authors:  Juntae Kim; Ik Hee Ryu; Jin Kuk Kim; In Sik Lee; Hong Kyu Kim; Eoksoo Han; Tae Keun Yoo
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 3.535

2.  Myopic regression and recurrent Salzmann nodule degeneration after laser in situ keratomileusis in Ehlers Danlos Syndrome.

Authors:  Grant C Hopping; Anisha N Somani; Uma Vaidyanathan; Harry Liu; James R Barnes; Yasmyne C Ronquillo; Phillip C Hoopes; Majid Moshirfar
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep       Date:  2020-05-04

3.  Survey of Ehlers-Danlos Patients' ophthalmic surgery experiences.

Authors:  Anita Louie; Catherine Meyerle; Clair Francomano; Divya Srikumaran; Farhan Merali; Jefferson J Doyle; Kraig Bower; Lara Bloom; Michael V Boland; Nicholas Mahoney; Yassine Daoud; Eric L Singman
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 2.183

4.  SmartSurfACE transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy with mitomycin C enhancement after small incision lenticule extraction.

Authors:  Amr A Gab-Alla
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2021-09-01

5.  Applying Information Gain to Explore Factors Affecting Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Shuang Liang; Shufan Ji; Xiao Liu; Min Chen; Yulin Lei; Jie Hou; Mengdi Li; Haohan Zou; Yusu Peng; Zhixing Ma; Yuanyuan Liu; Vishal Jhanji; Yan Wang
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-05-03

6.  Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) Enhancement for Residual Refractive Error after Primary LASIK.

Authors:  Majid Moshirfar; Noor F Basharat; Nour Bundogji; Emilie L Ungricht; Ines M Darquea; Matthew E Conley; Yasmyne C Ronquillo; Phillip C Hoopes
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 4.964

7.  Is the axial length a risk factor for post-LASIK myopic regression?

Authors:  Amr A Gab-Alla
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 8.  Complications of laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Pranita Sahay; Rahul Kumar Bafna; Jagadesh C Reddy; Rasik B Vajpayee; Namrata Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 1.848

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.