Literature DB >> 29700148

Reevaluation of the Complete Genome Sequence of Magnetospirillum gryphiswaldense MSR-1 with Single-Molecule Real-Time Sequencing Data.

René Uebe1, Dirk Schüler2, Christian Jogler3, Sandra Wiegand4.   

Abstract

Magnetospirillum gryphiswaldense is a key organism for understanding magnetosome formation and magnetotaxis. As earlier studies suggested a high genomic plasticity, we (re)sequenced the type strain MSR-1 and the laboratory strain R3/S1. Both sequences differ by only 11 point mutations, but organization of the magnetosome island deviates from that of previous genome sequences.
Copyright © 2018 Uebe et al.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 29700148      PMCID: PMC5920173          DOI: 10.1128/genomeA.00309-18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Announc


GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Magnetospirillum gryphiswaldense MSR-1 was isolated from river sediments in 1990 (1) and classified as the type species of the genus Magnetospirillum (2). It serves as a model organism for the analysis of bacterial magnetotaxis and magnetosome formation (3). A first version of the complete genome sequence, based on Illumina Solexa and Roche 454 reads, was published in 2014 (4). Notably, extensive rearrangements between this genome sequence and a previous draft genome sequence were observed, indicating a high genomic flexibility and “domestication” effects (4). To more deeply investigate this finding with state-of-the-art long-read sequencing, we sequenced one archetypal strain of M. gryphiswaldense, MSR-1, that was directly obtained from the DSMZ strain collection and the often-passaged, spontaneously rifampicin- and streptomycin-resistant lab strain R3/S1 (5). DNA was extracted and purified using 20/G Genomic-tips (Qiagen, Venlo, The Netherlands). The 10-kb SMRTbell template libraries were prepared according to Pacific Biosciences (Menlo Park, CA) instructions. Briefly, 8 µg of genomic DNA was sheared using g-tubes (Covaris, Woburn, MA). Fragments were end repaired and ligated overnight to hairpin adapters using the DNA/polymerase binding kit 2.0 (Pacific Biosciences). The 4-kb size selection was performed using a BluePippin system (Sage Science, Beverly, MA) according to the supplier’s instructions. Single-molecule real-time (SMRT) long-read sequencing was carried out utilizing P6 chemistry on a PacBio RS II instrument, taking 240-min movies for each SMRT cell. The 550-bp paired-end short-read libraries were prepared with the TruSeq DNA PCR-free LT library preparation kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA), according to instructions given in the TruSeq DNA PCR-free library prep reference guide's low sample (LS) protocol. The libraries were sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq system, employing a MiSeq reagent kit v3 (Illumina) and 600 cycles. Long-read genome assembly was performed using the RS_HGAP_Assembly.3 protocol SMRT Portal version 2.3.0 with standard parameters. Final contigs were error corrected by Illumina read mapping and subsequent variant and consensus calling using the Burrows-Wheeler Aligner (BWA), VarScan v2.3.7, and GenomeAnalysisTK (6–8). Resulting consensus sequences were trimmed, circularized, and aligned. Genome annotation was performed with Prokka v1.11 (9). Both genomes consist of one circularized contig each, having a size of 4,155,740 bp, a G+C content of 63.2%, and 3,980 genes. Unexpectedly, only 11 point mutations could be observed. Two are located within genes described to mediate rifampicin (rpoB) or streptomycin (rpsL) resistance upon modification (10, 11). These results explain the antibiotic resistances of strain R3/S1 and verify the different sources of the strains. In contrast to previous observations (12), no major genomic rearrangements could be detected. One possible explanation might be the high density of transposases found in the genome (88 genes annotated as transposase/integrase), impeding previous attempts at assembly without long-read data. The significantly reduced size of the new genome sequences also supports this interpretation (4, 13). Alternatively, the previously reported large deletions might occur only under specific stress conditions. Additionally, an ∼10-kb genomic region containing several magnetosome-related genes (e.g., feoAB1 and mmxF) and flanked by transposases, which was absent from a previous draft genome sequence (12) or was located at the 3′ end of the magnetosome island in the first complete genome sequence of M. gryphiswaldense (3), is located at the 5′ region of the magnetosome island in our new genome sequences.

Accession number(s).

The whole-genome sequences described here have been deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers CP027526 and CP027527.
  11 in total

1.  The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data.

Authors:  Aaron McKenna; Matthew Hanna; Eric Banks; Andrey Sivachenko; Kristian Cibulskis; Andrew Kernytsky; Kiran Garimella; David Altshuler; Stacey Gabriel; Mark Daly; Mark A DePristo
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  VarScan 2: somatic mutation and copy number alteration discovery in cancer by exome sequencing.

Authors:  Daniel C Koboldt; Qunyuan Zhang; David E Larson; Dong Shen; Michael D McLellan; Ling Lin; Christopher A Miller; Elaine R Mardis; Li Ding; Richard K Wilson
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Frequent mutations within the genomic magnetosome island of Magnetospirillum gryphiswaldense are mediated by RecA.

Authors:  Isabel Kolinko; Christian Jogler; Emanuel Katzmann; Dirk Schüler
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation.

Authors:  Torsten Seemann
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 5.  Magnetosome biogenesis in magnetotactic bacteria.

Authors:  René Uebe; Dirk Schüler
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 60.633

6.  Rifampicin resistance and mutation of the rpoB gene in Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  H Taniguchi; H Aramaki; Y Nikaido; Y Mizuguchi; M Nakamura; T Koga; S Yoshida
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  1996-10-15       Impact factor: 2.742

7.  Inactivation of the flagellin gene flaA in Magnetospirillum gryphiswaldense results in nonmagnetotactic mutants lacking flagellar filaments.

Authors:  Daniel Schultheiss; Michael Kube; Dirk Schüler
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Comparative genome analysis of four magnetotactic bacteria reveals a complex set of group-specific genes implicated in magnetosome biomineralization and function.

Authors:  Michael Richter; Michael Kube; Dennis A Bazylinski; Thierry Lombardot; Frank Oliver Glöckner; Richard Reinhardt; Dirk Schüler
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2007-04-20       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform.

Authors:  Heng Li; Richard Durbin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  Complete Genome Sequence of Magnetospirillum gryphiswaldense MSR-1.

Authors:  Xu Wang; Qing Wang; Weijia Zhang; Yinjia Wang; Li Li; Tong Wen; Tongwei Zhang; Yang Zhang; Jun Xu; Junying Hu; Shuqi Li; Lingzi Liu; Jinxin Liu; Wei Jiang; Jiesheng Tian; Ying Li; Dirk Schüler; Lei Wang; Jilun Li
Journal:  Genome Announc       Date:  2014-03-13
View more
  8 in total

1.  Spatiotemporal Organization of Chemotaxis Pathways in Magnetospirillum gryphiswaldense.

Authors:  Daniel Pfeiffer; Julian Herz; Julia Schmiedel; Felix Popp; Dirk Schüler
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Bacterioferritin of Magnetospirillum gryphiswaldense Is a Heterotetraeicosameric Complex Composed of Functionally Distinct Subunits but Is Not Involved in Magnetite Biomineralization.

Authors:  René Uebe; Frederik Ahrens; Jörg Stang; Katharina Jäger; Lars H Böttger; Christian Schmidt; Berthold F Matzanke; Dirk Schüler
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 7.867

3.  Long-term observation of Magnetospirillum gryphiswaldense in a microfluidic channel.

Authors:  Tijmen A G Hageman; Marc P Pichel; Per A Löthman; Jiung Cho; Miri Choi; Nuriye Korkmaz; Andreas Manz; Leon Abelmann
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 2.552

4.  Towards a 'chassis' for bacterial magnetosome biosynthesis: genome streamlining of Magnetospirillum gryphiswaldense by multiple deletions.

Authors:  Theresa Zwiener; Marina Dziuba; Frank Mickoleit; Christian Rückert; Tobias Busche; Jörn Kalinowski; René Uebe; Dirk Schüler
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 5.328

5.  Identification and elimination of genomic regions irrelevant for magnetosome biosynthesis by large-scale deletion in Magnetospirillum gryphiswaldense.

Authors:  Theresa Zwiener; Frank Mickoleit; Marina Dziuba; Christian Rückert; Tobias Busche; Jörn Kalinowski; Damien Faivre; René Uebe; Dirk Schüler
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 3.605

6.  Reply to Monteil et al.: Universal presence of core magnetite biomineralization genes points to ancient symbiosis.

Authors:  M Renee Bellinger; Uwe Hartmann; Hervé Cadiou; Michael Winklhofer; Michael A Banks
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 12.779

7.  The transcriptomic landscape of Magnetospirillum gryphiswaldense during magnetosome biomineralization.

Authors:  Cornelius N Riese; Manuel Wittchen; Valérie Jérôme; Ruth Freitag; Tobias Busche; Jörn Kalinowski; Dirk Schüler
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 4.547

8.  Genome-Wide Identification of Essential and Auxiliary Gene Sets for Magnetosome Biosynthesis in Magnetospirillum gryphiswaldense.

Authors:  Karen T Silva; Margarete Schüler; Frank Mickoleit; Theresa Zwiener; Frank D Müller; Ram Prasad Awal; Alfons Weig; Andreas Brachmann; René Uebe; Dirk Schüler
Journal:  mSystems       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 6.496

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.