Literature DB >> 17449609

Comparative genome analysis of four magnetotactic bacteria reveals a complex set of group-specific genes implicated in magnetosome biomineralization and function.

Michael Richter1, Michael Kube, Dennis A Bazylinski, Thierry Lombardot, Frank Oliver Glöckner, Richard Reinhardt, Dirk Schüler.   

Abstract

Magnetotactic bacteria (MTB) are a heterogeneous group of aquatic prokaryotes with a unique intracellular organelle, the magnetosome, which orients the cell along magnetic field lines. Magnetotaxis is a complex phenotype, which depends on the coordinate synthesis of magnetosomes and the ability to swim and orient along the direction caused by the interaction with the Earth's magnetic field. Although a number of putative magnetotaxis genes were recently identified within a conserved genomic magnetosome island (MAI) of several MTB, their functions have remained mostly unknown, and it was speculated that additional genes located outside the MAI might be involved in magnetosome formation and magnetotaxis. In order to identify genes specifically associated with the magnetotactic phenotype, we conducted comparisons between four sequenced magnetotactic Alphaproteobacteria including the nearly complete genome of Magnetospirillum gryphiswaldense strain MSR-1, the complete genome of Magnetospirillum magneticum strain AMB-1, the complete genome of the magnetic coccus MC-1, and the comparative-ready preliminary genome assembly of Magnetospirillum magnetotacticum strain MS-1 against an in-house database comprising 426 complete bacterial and archaeal genome sequences. A magnetobacterial core genome of about 891 genes was found shared by all four MTB. In addition to a set of approximately 152 genus-specific genes shared by the three Magnetospirillum strains, we identified 28 genes as group specific, i.e., which occur in all four analyzed MTB but exhibit no (MTB-specific genes) or only remote (MTB-related genes) similarity to any genes from nonmagnetotactic organisms and which besides various novel genes include nearly all mam and mms genes previously shown to control magnetosome formation. The MTB-specific and MTB-related genes to a large extent display synteny, partially encode previously unrecognized magnetosome membrane proteins, and are either located within (18 genes) or outside (10 genes) the MAI of M. gryphiswaldense. These genes, which represent less than 1% of the 4,268 open reading frames of the MSR-1 genome, as yet are mostly of unknown functions but are likely to be specifically involved in magnetotaxis and, thus, represent prime targets for future experimental analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17449609      PMCID: PMC1913459          DOI: 10.1128/JB.00119-07

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bacteriol        ISSN: 0021-9193            Impact factor:   3.490


  39 in total

1.  Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes.

Authors:  A Krogh; B Larsson; G von Heijne; E L Sonnhammer
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-01-19       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Potential genomic determinants of hyperthermophily.

Authors:  Kira S Makarova; Yuri I Wolf; Eugene V Koonin
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 11.639

3.  Common extracellular sensory domains in transmembrane receptors for diverse signal transduction pathways in bacteria and archaea.

Authors:  Igor B Zhulin; Anastasia N Nikolskaya; Michael Y Galperin
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 4.  Ecological role of energy taxis in microorganisms.

Authors:  Gladys Alexandre; Suzanne Greer-Phillips; Igor B Zhulin
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 16.408

5.  Cyanobacterial signature genes.

Authors:  Kirt A Martin; Janet L Siefert; Sailaja Yerrapragada; Yue Lu; Thomas Z McNeill; Pedro A Moreno; George M Weinstock; William R Widger; George E Fox
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Orphans as taxonomically restricted and ecologically important genes.

Authors:  G A Wilson; N Bertrand; Y Patel; J B Hughes; E J Feil; D Field
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.777

7.  Magnetosomes are cell membrane invaginations organized by the actin-like protein MamK.

Authors:  Arash Komeili; Zhuo Li; Dianne K Newman; Grant J Jensen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Consed: a graphical tool for sequence finishing.

Authors:  D Gordon; C Abajian; P Green
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  Origin of magnetosome membrane: proteomic analysis of magnetosome membrane and comparison with cytoplasmic membrane.

Authors:  Masayoshi Tanaka; Yoshiko Okamura; Atsushi Arakaki; Tsuyoshi Tanaka; Haruko Takeyama; Tadashi Matsunaga
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.984

10.  Biochemical and proteomic analysis of the magnetosome membrane in Magnetospirillum gryphiswaldense.

Authors:  Karen Grünberg; Eva-Christina Müller; Albrecht Otto; Regina Reszka; Dietmar Linder; Michael Kube; Richard Reinhardt; Dirk Schüler
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  57 in total

1.  The MagA protein of Magnetospirilla is not involved in bacterial magnetite biomineralization.

Authors:  René Uebe; Verena Henn; Dirk Schüler
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Reconstruction of iron metabolism pathways of bacteria Magnetospirillum aberrantis SpK spp. based on sequenced genome analysis.

Authors:  M V Dzyuba; A V Mardanov; A V Beletskii; T V Kolganova; M V Sukhacheva; A A Shelenkov; V M Gorlenko; B B Kuznetsov; K G Skryabin
Journal:  Dokl Biol Sci       Date:  2012-07-05

Review 3.  Cell biology of prokaryotic organelles.

Authors:  Dorothee Murat; Meghan Byrne; Arash Komeili
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 10.005

4.  Visualization and structural analysis of the bacterial magnetic organelle magnetosome using atomic force microscopy.

Authors:  Daisuke Yamamoto; Azuma Taoka; Takayuki Uchihashi; Hideaki Sasaki; Hiroki Watanabe; Toshio Ando; Yoshihiro Fukumori
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-05-03       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  MMS6 protein regulates crystal morphology during nano-sized magnetite biomineralization in vivo.

Authors:  Masayoshi Tanaka; Eri Mazuyama; Atsushi Arakaki; Tadashi Matsunaga
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-12-18       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 6.  Biogenesis and subcellular organization of the magnetosome organelles of magnetotactic bacteria.

Authors:  Shannon E Greene; Arash Komeili
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 8.382

Review 7.  From invagination to navigation: The story of magnetosome-associated proteins in magnetotactic bacteria.

Authors:  Shiran Barber-Zucker; Noa Keren-Khadmy; Raz Zarivach
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 6.725

8.  Complete genome sequence of the chemolithoautotrophic marine magnetotactic coccus strain MC-1.

Authors:  Sabrina Schübbe; Timothy J Williams; Gary Xie; Hajnalka E Kiss; Thomas S Brettin; Diego Martinez; Christian A Ross; Dirk Schüler; B Lea Cox; Kenneth H Nealson; Dennis A Bazylinski
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Genetic dissection of the mamAB and mms6 operons reveals a gene set essential for magnetosome biogenesis in Magnetospirillum gryphiswaldense.

Authors:  Anna Lohße; Sarah Borg; Oliver Raschdorf; Isabel Kolinko; Eva Tompa; Mihály Pósfai; Damien Faivre; Jens Baumgartner; Dirk Schüler
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Noncovalent immobilization of streptavidin on in vitro- and in vivo-biotinylated bacterial magnetic particles.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Maeda; Tomoko Yoshino; Masaaki Takahashi; Harumi Ginya; Junko Asahina; Hideji Tajima; Tadashi Matsunaga
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.