Literature DB >> 29698738

Uranyl acetate induced DNA single strand breaks and AP sites in Chinese hamster ovary cells.

Monica Yellowhair1, Michelle R Romanotto2, Diane M Stearns2, R Clark Lantz3.   

Abstract

The aim of this study is to characterize the genotoxicity of depleted uranium (DU) in Chinese Hamster Ovary cells (CHO) with mutations in various DNA repair pathways. CHO cells were exposed to 0-300 μM of soluble DU as uranyl acetate (UA) for 0-48 h. Intracellular UA concentrations were measured via inductively coupled mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) and visualized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Cytotoxicity was assessed in vitro by clonogenic survival assay. DNA damage response was assessed via Fast Micromethod® to determine UA-induced DNA single strand breaks. Results indicate that UA is entering the CHO cells, with the highest concentration localizing in the nucleus. Clonogenic assays show that UA is cytotoxic in each cell line with the greatest cytotoxicity in the base excision repair deficient EM9 cells and the nuclear excision repair deficient UV5 cells compared to the non-homologous end joining deficient V3.3 cells and the parental AA8 cells after 48 h. This indicates that UA is producing single strand breaks and forming UA-DNA adducts rather than double strand breaks in CHO cells. Fast Micromethod® results indicate an increased amount of single strand breaks in the EM9 cells after 48 h UA exposure compared to the V3.3 and AA8 cells. These results indicate that DU induces DNA damage via strand breaks and uranium-DNA adducts in treated cells. These results suggest that: (1) DU is genotoxic in CHO cells, and (2) DU is inducing single strand breaks rather than double strand breaks in vitro.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cytotoxicity; DNA Damage; Depleted Uranium; Uranyl Acetate

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29698738      PMCID: PMC5972677          DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2018.04.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol        ISSN: 0041-008X            Impact factor:   4.219


  45 in total

Review 1.  Repair of abasic sites in DNA.

Authors:  Grigory L Dianov; Kate M Sleeth; Irina I Dianova; Sarah L Allinson
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2003-10-29       Impact factor: 2.433

2.  Chromosomal aberrations in the leucocytes of men occupationally exposed to uranyl compounds.

Authors:  P A Prabhavathi; P Padmavathi; P P Reddy
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.151

3.  Uranium induces apoptosis and is genotoxic to normal rat kidney (NRK-52E) proximal cells.

Authors:  Céline Thiébault; Marie Carrière; Sarah Milgram; Angélique Simon; Laure Avoscan; Barbara Gouget
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Microbial communities in contaminated sediments, associated with bioremediation of uranium to submicromolar levels.

Authors:  Erick Cardenas; Wei-Min Wu; Mary Beth Leigh; Jack Carley; Sue Carroll; Terry Gentry; Jian Luo; David Watson; Baohua Gu; Matthew Ginder-Vogel; Peter K Kitanidis; Philip M Jardine; Jizhong Zhou; Craig S Criddle; Terence L Marsh; James M Tiedje
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-05-02       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Particulate depleted uranium is cytotoxic and clastogenic to human lung epithelial cells.

Authors:  Carolyne LaCerte; Hong Xie; AbouEl-Makarim Aboueissa; John Pierce Wise
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 2.433

6.  Molecular cloning of the human XRCC1 gene, which corrects defective DNA strand break repair and sister chromatid exchange.

Authors:  L H Thompson; K W Brookman; N J Jones; S A Allen; A V Carrano
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Uranyl acetate causes DNA single strand breaks in vitro in the presence of ascorbate (vitamin C).

Authors:  Monica Yazzie; Shania L Gamble; Edgar R Civitello; Diane M Stearns
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.739

8.  XRCC1 coordinates the initial and late stages of DNA abasic site repair through protein-protein interactions.

Authors:  A E Vidal; S Boiteux; I D Hickson; J P Radicella
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  Analysis of heat-labile sites generated by reactions of depleted uranium and ascorbate in plasmid DNA.

Authors:  Janice Wilson; Ashley Young; Edgar R Civitello; Diane M Stearns
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 3.358

10.  Transformation of human osteoblast cells to the tumorigenic phenotype by depleted uranium-uranyl chloride.

Authors:  A C Miller; W F Blakely; D Livengood; T Whittaker; J Xu; J W Ejnik; M M Hamilton; E Parlette; T S John; H M Gerstenberg; H Hsu
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  A review of heavy metal cation binding to deoxyribonucleic acids for the creation of chemical sensors.

Authors:  Vangelis George Kanellis; Cristobal G Dos Remedios
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2018-09-18

2.  Uranium directly interacts with the DNA repair protein poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase 1.

Authors:  Xixi Zhou; Bingye Xue; Sebastian Medina; Scott W Burchiel; Ke Jian Liu
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 4.219

Review 3.  Review of Knowledge of Uranium-Induced Kidney Toxicity for the Development of an Adverse Outcome Pathway to Renal Impairment.

Authors:  Yann Guéguen; Marie Frerejacques
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 6.208

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.