Literature DB >> 29698720

Comparison of Two Lidocaine Administration Techniques on Perceived Pain From Bedside Procedures: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Bhakti K Patel1, Blair N Wendlandt2, Krysta S Wolfe1, Shruti B Patel3, Elizabeth R Doman4, Anne S Pohlman1, Jesse B Hall1, John P Kress5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lidocaine is used to alleviate procedural pain but paradoxically increases pain during injection. Pain perception can be modulated by non-noxious stimuli such as temperature or touch according to the gate control theory of pain. We postulated that lidocaine dripped onto the skin prior to injection would cool or add the sensation of touch at the skin surface to reduce pain perception from the procedure.
METHODS: A randomized clinical trial of patients referred to the procedure service from February 2011 through March 2015 was conducted. All patients received 1% subcutaneous lidocaine injection. Patients randomized to the intervention group had approximately 1 to 2 ml of lidocaine squirted onto the skin surface prior to subcutaneous lidocaine injection. Patients were blinded to the details of the intervention and were surveyed by a blinded investigator to document the primary outcome (severity of pain from the procedure) using a visual analog scale.
RESULTS: A total of 481 patients provided consent and were randomized to treatment. There was a significant improvement in the primary outcome of procedural pain (control, 16.6 ± 24.8 mm vs 12.2 ± 19.4 mm; P = .03) with the intervention group as assessed by using the visual analog scale score. Pain scores were primarily improved for peripherally inserted central catheters (control, 18.8 ± 25.6 mm vs 12.2 ± 18.2 mm; P = .02) upon subgroup analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: Bedside procedures are exceedingly common. Data regarding the severity of procedural pain and strategies to mitigate it are important for the informed consent process and patient satisfaction. Overall, pain reported from common bedside procedures is low, but pain can be further reduced with the addition of lidocaine onto the skin surface to modulate pain perception. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT01330134; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
Copyright © 2018 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bedside procedure; central lines; lidocaine; pain

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29698720      PMCID: PMC6207790          DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.04.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  31 in total

1.  Innocuous skin cooling modulates perception and neurophysiological correlates of brief CO2 laser stimuli in humans.

Authors:  Hicham Nahra; Léon Plaghki
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2004-12-18       Impact factor: 3.931

2.  A comparison of pain rating scales by sampling from clinical trial data.

Authors:  E K Breivik; G A Björnsson; E Skovlund
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.442

Review 3.  A proposal to use confidence intervals for visual analog scale data for pain measurement to determine clinical significance.

Authors:  S Mantha; R Thisted; J Foss; J E Ellis; M F Roizen
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 5.108

4.  A Randomized Controlled Trial of Procedural Techniques for Large Volume Paracentesis.

Authors:  Amy Shriver; Sean Rudnick; Nicolas Intagliata; Amanda Wang; Stephen H Caldwell; Patrick Northup
Journal:  Ann Hepatol       Date:  2017 March-April       Impact factor: 2.400

5.  The importance of needle gauge for pain during injection of lidocaine.

Authors:  Kathrine J Wågø; Trine I Skarsvåg; Janne S Lundbom; Lena F Tangen; Solveig Ballo; Tonje Hjelseng; Vilhjalmur Finsen
Journal:  J Plast Surg Hand Surg       Date:  2015-11-23

6.  Buffered versus plain lidocaine for digital nerve blocks.

Authors:  J M Bartfield; D T Ford; P J Homer
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 5.721

7.  The effect of vibration on pain during local anaesthesia injections.

Authors:  E Nanitsos; R Vartuli; A Forte; P J Dennison; C C Peck
Journal:  Aust Dent J       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.291

Review 8.  Risk of Procedural Hemorrhage.

Authors:  Krysta S Wolfe; John P Kress
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  Does topical lidocaine attenuate the pain of infiltration of buffered lidocaine?

Authors:  J M Bartfield; N Raccio-Robak; R F Salluzzo
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.451

10.  Implementation of the quality management system improves postoperative pain treatment: a prospective pre-/post-interventional questionnaire study.

Authors:  T I Usichenko; I Röttenbacher; T Kohlmann; A Jülich; J Lange; A Mustea; G Engel; M Wendt
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 9.166

View more
  3 in total

1.  Skin Cooling to Reduce the Pain Associated with Local Anesthetic Injection; a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Saeed Majidinejad; Farhad Heidari; Amirhosein Famil Chitgarian
Journal:  Arch Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2022-03-10

2.  Efficacy of Local Anesthesia in the Face and Scalp: A Prospective Trial.

Authors:  Tyler Safran; Dino Zammit; Jonathan Kanevsky; Manish Khanna
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-05-16

3.  Comparing the Effect of Lidocaine-Prilocaine Cream and Infiltrative Lidocaine on Overall Pain Perception During Thoracentesis and Abdominocentesis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Hanieh Halili; Reza Azizkhani; Saeid Tavakoli Garmaseh; Mohammad Saleh Jafarpisheh; Farhad Heydari; Babak Masoumi; Asieh Maghami Mehr
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2020-11-18
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.