Literature DB >> 29698052

Reward-based motor adaptation can generalize across actions.

Katinka van der Kooij1, Jeroen B J Smeets1.   

Abstract

Recently it has been shown that rewarded variability can be used to adapt visuomotor behavior. However, its relevance seems limited because adaptation to binary rewards has been demonstrated only when the same movement is repeated throughout the experiment. We therefore investigated whether the adaptation is action-specific and whether the amount of exploration depends on spatial complexity. Participants pointed to 3-D visual targets without seeing their hand and could use only binary reward feedback to adapt their movements. We varied the number of target positions and the number of dimensions the feedback was based on. Because the feedback was based on a 5-cm rightward shifted hand position, adaptation was needed for good performance. The participants started naïve to the perturbation. If actions were made toward a single target position and the feedback was based on the lateral component of their response only, participants adapted completely within 200 trials. Having more than 1 target position or more than 1 dimension of performance resulted in considerably less adaptation but did not affect the exploration. Thus, reward-based adaptation can generalize across actions but is reduced by spatial complexity, whereas exploration is not affected by spatial complexity. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29698052     DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000573

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  6 in total

1.  Reinforcement regulates timing variability in thalamus.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Eghbal Hosseini; Nicolas Meirhaeghe; Adam Akkad; Mehrdad Jazayeri
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 8.140

2.  The gradient of the reinforcement landscape influences sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  Joshua G A Cashaback; Christopher K Lao; Dimitrios J Palidis; Susan K Coltman; Heather R McGregor; Paul L Gribble
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 4.475

3.  Clustering analysis of movement kinematics in reinforcement learning.

Authors:  Ananda Sidarta; John Komar; David J Ostry
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Quantifying exploration in reward-based motor learning.

Authors:  Nina M van Mastrigt; Jeroen B J Smeets; Katinka van der Kooij
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Parental praise and children's exploration: a virtual reality experiment.

Authors:  Eddie Brummelman; Stathis Grapsas; Katinka van der Kooij
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Pitfalls in quantifying exploration in reward-based motor learning and how to avoid them.

Authors:  Nina M van Mastrigt; Katinka van der Kooij; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 2.086

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.