Literature DB >> 29697704

An ice sheet model validation framework for the Greenland ice sheet.

Stephen F Price1, Matthew J Hoffman1, Jennifer A Bonin2, Ian M Howat3, Thomas Neumann4, Jack Saba4,5, Irina Tezaur6, Jeffrey Guerber4,7, Don P Chambers2, Katherine J Evans8, Joseph H Kennedy8, Jan Lenaerts9, William H Lipscomb1, Mauro Perego10, Andrew G Salinger10, Raymond S Tuminaro10, Michiel R van den Broeke9, Sophie M J Nowicki4.   

Abstract

We propose a new ice sheet model validation framework - the Cryospheric Model Comparison Tool (CmCt) - that takes advantage of ice sheet altimetry and gravimetry observations collected over the past several decades and is applied here to modeling of the Greenland ice sheet. We use realistic simulations performed with the Community Ice Sheet Model (CISM) along with two idealized, non-dynamic models to demonstrate the framework and its use. Dynamic simulations with CISM are forced from 1991 to 2013 using combinations of reanalysis-based surface mass balance and observations of outlet glacier flux change. We propose and demonstrate qualitative and quantitative metrics for use in evaluating the different model simulations against the observations. We find that the altimetry observations used here are largely ambiguous in terms of their ability to distinguish one simulation from another. Based on basin- and whole-ice-sheet scale metrics, we find that simulations using both idealized conceptual models and dynamic, numerical models provide an equally reasonable representation of the ice sheet surface (mean elevation differences of <1 m). This is likely due to their short period of record, biases inherent to digital elevation models used for model initial conditions, and biases resulting from firn dynamics, which are not explicitly accounted for in the models or observations. On the other hand, we find that the gravimetry observations used here are able to unambiguously distinguish between simulations of varying complexity, and along with the CmCt, can provide a quantitative score for assessing a particular model and/or simulation. The new framework demonstrates that our proposed metrics can distinguish relatively better from relatively worse simulations and that dynamic ice sheet models, when appropriately initialized and forced with the right boundary conditions, demonstrate predictive skill with respect to observed dynamic changes occurring on Greenland over the past few decades. An extensible design will allow for continued use of the CmCt as future altimetry, gravimetry, and other remotely sensed data become available for use in ice sheet model validation.

Year:  2017        PMID: 29697704      PMCID: PMC5911937          DOI: 10.5194/gmd-10-255-2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Geosci Model Dev        ISSN: 1991-959X            Impact factor:   6.135


  13 in total

1.  Recent contributions of glaciers and ice caps to sea level rise.

Authors:  Thomas Jacob; John Wahr; W Tad Pfeffer; Sean Swenson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Spatial and temporal distribution of mass loss from the Greenland Ice Sheet since AD 1900.

Authors:  Kristian K Kjeldsen; Niels J Korsgaard; Anders A Bjørk; Shfaqat A Khan; Jason E Box; Svend Funder; Nicolaj K Larsen; Jonathan L Bamber; William Colgan; Michiel van den Broeke; Marie-Louise Siggaard-Andersen; Christopher Nuth; Anders Schomacker; Camilla S Andresen; Eske Willerslev; Kurt H Kjær
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Large fluctuations in speed on Greenland's Jakobshavn Isbrae glacier.

Authors:  Ian Joughin; Waleed Abdalati; Mark Fahnestock
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-12-02       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  21st-century evolution of Greenland outlet glacier velocities.

Authors:  T Moon; I Joughin; B Smith; I Howat
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Enhanced basal lubrication and the contribution of the Greenland ice sheet to future sea-level rise.

Authors:  Sarah R Shannon; Antony J Payne; Ian D Bartholomew; Michiel R van den Broeke; Tamsin L Edwards; Xavier Fettweis; Olivier Gagliardini; Fabien Gillet-Chaulet; Heiko Goelzer; Matthew J Hoffman; Philippe Huybrechts; Douglas W F Mair; Peter W Nienow; Mauro Perego; Stephen F Price; C J P Paul Smeets; Andrew J Sole; Roderik S W van de Wal; Thomas Zwinger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Extensive dynamic thinning on the margins of the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets.

Authors:  Hamish D Pritchard; Robert J Arthern; David G Vaughan; Laura A Edwards
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Sharply increased mass loss from glaciers and ice caps in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago.

Authors:  Alex S Gardner; Geir Moholdt; Bert Wouters; Gabriel J Wolken; David O Burgess; Martin J Sharp; J Graham Cogley; Carsten Braun; Claude Labine
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Laser altimetry reveals complex pattern of Greenland Ice Sheet dynamics.

Authors:  Beata M Csatho; Anton F Schenk; Cornelis J van der Veen; Gregory Babonis; Kyle Duncan; Soroush Rezvanbehbahani; Michiel R van den Broeke; Sebastian B Simonsen; Sudhagar Nagarajan; Jan H van Angelen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  A reconciled estimate of ice-sheet mass balance.

Authors:  Andrew Shepherd; Erik R Ivins; Geruo A; Valentina R Barletta; Mike J Bentley; Srinivas Bettadpur; Kate H Briggs; David H Bromwich; René Forsberg; Natalia Galin; Martin Horwath; Stan Jacobs; Ian Joughin; Matt A King; Jan T M Lenaerts; Jilu Li; Stefan R M Ligtenberg; Adrian Luckman; Scott B Luthcke; Malcolm McMillan; Rakia Meister; Glenn Milne; Jeremie Mouginot; Alan Muir; Julien P Nicolas; John Paden; Antony J Payne; Hamish Pritchard; Eric Rignot; Helmut Rott; Louise Sandberg Sørensen; Ted A Scambos; Bernd Scheuchl; Ernst J O Schrama; Ben Smith; Aud V Sundal; Jan H van Angelen; Willem J van de Berg; Michiel R van den Broeke; David G Vaughan; Isabella Velicogna; John Wahr; Pippa L Whitehouse; Duncan J Wingham; Donghui Yi; Duncan Young; H Jay Zwally
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Complex Greenland outlet glacier flow captured.

Authors:  Andy Aschwanden; Mark A Fahnestock; Martin Truffer
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  3 in total

1.  Design and results of the ice sheet model initialisation experiments initMIP-Greenland: an ISMIP6 intercomparison.

Authors:  Heiko Goelzer; Sophie Nowicki; Tamsin Edwards; Matthew Beckley; Ayako Abe-Ouchi; Andy Aschwanden; Reinhard Calov; Olivier Gagliardini; Fabien Gillet-Chaulet; Nicholas R Golledge; Jonathan Gregory; Ralf Greve; Angelika Humbert; Philippe Huybrechts; Joseph H Kennedy; Eric Larour; William H Lipscomb; Sébastien Le Clećh; Victoria Lee; Mathieu Morlighem; Frank Pattyn; Antony J Payne; Christian Rodehacke; Martin Rückamp; Fuyuki Saito; Nicole Schlegel; Helene Seroussi; Andrew Shepherd; Sainan Sun; Roderik van de Wal; Florian A Ziemen
Journal:  Cryosphere       Date:  2019-04-19       Impact factor: 5.771

Review 2.  Rising Oceans Guaranteed: Arctic Land Ice Loss and Sea Level Rise.

Authors:  Twila Moon; Andreas Ahlstrøm; Heiko Goelzer; William Lipscomb; Sophie Nowicki
Journal:  Curr Clim Change Rep       Date:  2018-07-10

Review 3.  Recent Progress in Greenland Ice Sheet Modelling.

Authors:  Heiko Goelzer; Alexander Robinson; Helene Seroussi; Roderik S W van de Wal
Journal:  Curr Clim Change Rep       Date:  2017-11-13
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.