Literature DB >> 32676174

Design and results of the ice sheet model initialisation experiments initMIP-Greenland: an ISMIP6 intercomparison.

Heiko Goelzer1,2, Sophie Nowicki3, Tamsin Edwards4, Matthew Beckley3, Ayako Abe-Ouchi5, Andy Aschwanden6, Reinhard Calov7, Olivier Gagliardini8, Fabien Gillet-Chaulet8, Nicholas R Golledge9, Jonathan Gregory10,11, Ralf Greve12, Angelika Humbert13,14, Philippe Huybrechts15, Joseph H Kennedy16,17, Eric Larour18, William H Lipscomb19,20, Sébastien Le Clećh21, Victoria Lee22, Mathieu Morlighem23, Frank Pattyn2, Antony J Payne22, Christian Rodehacke24,13, Martin Rückamp13, Fuyuki Saito25, Nicole Schlegel18, Helene Seroussi18, Andrew Shepherd26, Sainan Sun2, Roderik van de Wal1, Florian A Ziemen27.   

Abstract

Earlier large-scale Greenland ice sheet sea-level projections (e.g., those run during the ice2sea and SeaRISE initiatives) have shown that ice sheet initial conditions have a large effect on the projections and give rise to important uncertainties. The goal of the initMIP-Greenland intercomparison exercise is to compare, evaluate and improve the initialisation techniques used in the ice sheet modelling community and to estimate the associated uncertainties in modelled mass changes. initMIP-Greenland is the first in a series of ice sheet model intercomparison activities within ISMIP6 (the Ice Sheet Model Intercomparison Project for CMIP6), which is the primary activity within the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project - phase 6 (CMIP6) focusing on the ice sheets. Two experiments for the large-scale Greenland ice sheet have been designed to allow intercomparison between participating models of 1) the initial present-day state of the ice sheet and 2) the response in two idealised forward experiments. The forward experiments serve to evaluate the initialisation in terms of model drift (forward run without additional forcing) and in response to a large perturbation (prescribed surface mass balance anomaly), and should not be interpreted as sea-level projections. We present and discuss results that highlight the diversity of data sets, boundary conditions and initialisation techniques used in the community to generate initial states of the Greenland ice sheet. We find good agreement across the ensemble for the dynamic response to surface mass balance changes in areas where the simulated ice sheets overlap, but differences arising from the initial size of the ice sheet. The model drift in the control experiment is reduced for models that participated in earlier intercomparison exercises.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 32676174      PMCID: PMC7365265          DOI: 10.5194/tc-12-1433-2018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cryosphere        ISSN: 1994-0416            Impact factor:   5.771


  16 in total

1.  High-resolution record of Northern Hemisphere climate extending into the last interglacial period.

Authors:  K K Andersen; N Azuma; J-M Barnola; M Bigler; P Biscaye; N Caillon; J Chappellaz; H B Clausen; D Dahl-Jensen; H Fischer; J Flückiger; D Fritzsche; Y Fujii; K Goto-Azuma; K Grønvold; N S Gundestrup; M Hansson; C Huber; C S Hvidberg; S J Johnsen; U Jonsell; J Jouzel; S Kipfstuhl; A Landais; M Leuenberger; R Lorrain; V Masson-Delmotte; H Miller; H Motoyama; H Narita; T Popp; S O Rasmussen; D Raynaud; R Rothlisberger; U Ruth; D Samyn; J Schwander; H Shoji; M-L Siggard-Andersen; J P Steffensen; T Stocker; A E Sveinbjörnsdóttir; A Svensson; M Takata; J-L Tison; Th Thorsteinsson; O Watanabe; F Wilhelms; J W C White
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-09-09       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Heat flux anomalies in Antarctica revealed by satellite magnetic data.

Authors:  Cathrine Fox Maule; Michael E Purucker; Nils Olsen; Klaus Mosegaard
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-06-09       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Enhanced basal lubrication and the contribution of the Greenland ice sheet to future sea-level rise.

Authors:  Sarah R Shannon; Antony J Payne; Ian D Bartholomew; Michiel R van den Broeke; Tamsin L Edwards; Xavier Fettweis; Olivier Gagliardini; Fabien Gillet-Chaulet; Heiko Goelzer; Matthew J Hoffman; Philippe Huybrechts; Douglas W F Mair; Peter W Nienow; Mauro Perego; Stephen F Price; C J P Paul Smeets; Andrew J Sole; Roderik S W van de Wal; Thomas Zwinger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Partitioning recent Greenland mass loss.

Authors:  Michiel van den Broeke; Jonathan Bamber; Janneke Ettema; Eric Rignot; Ernst Schrama; Willem Jan van de Berg; Erik van Meijgaard; Isabella Velicogna; Bert Wouters
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  800,000 years of abrupt climate variability.

Authors:  Stephen Barker; Gregor Knorr; R Lawrence Edwards; Frédéric Parrenin; Aaron E Putnam; Luke C Skinner; Eric Wolff; Martin Ziegler
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Committed sea-level rise for the next century from Greenland ice sheet dynamics during the past decade.

Authors:  Stephen F Price; Antony J Payne; Ian M Howat; Benjamin E Smith
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Antarctic contribution to meltwater pulse 1A from reduced Southern Ocean overturning.

Authors:  N R Golledge; L Menviel; L Carter; C J Fogwill; M H England; G Cortese; R H Levy
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Ice Sheet Model Intercomparison Project (ISMIP6) contribution to CMIP6.

Authors:  Sophie M J Nowicki; Tony Payne; Eric Larour; Helene Seroussi; Heiko Goelzer; William Lipscomb; Jonathan Gregory; Ayako Abe-Ouchi; Andrew Shepherd
Journal:  Geosci Model Dev       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 6.135

Review 9.  Recent Progress in Greenland Ice Sheet Modelling.

Authors:  Heiko Goelzer; Alexander Robinson; Helene Seroussi; Roderik S W van de Wal
Journal:  Curr Clim Change Rep       Date:  2017-11-13

10.  Radiostratigraphy and age structure of the Greenland Ice Sheet.

Authors:  Joseph A MacGregor; Mark A Fahnestock; Ginny A Catania; John D Paden; S Prasad Gogineni; S Keith Young; Susan C Rybarski; Alexandria N Mabrey; Benjamin M Wagman; Mathieu Morlighem
Journal:  J Geophys Res Earth Surf       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 4.041

View more
  2 in total

1.  Retreat of Humboldt Gletscher, North Greenland, Driven by Undercutting From a Warmer Ocean.

Authors:  Eric Rignot; Lu An; Nolwenn Chauche; Mathieu Morlighem; Seongsu Jeong; Michael Wood; Jeremie Mouginot; Josh K Willis; Ingo Klaucke; Wilhelm Weinrebe; Andreas Muenchow
Journal:  Geophys Res Lett       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 4.720

2.  Impact of paleoclimate on present and future evolution of the Greenland Ice Sheet.

Authors:  Hu Yang; Uta Krebs-Kanzow; Thomas Kleiner; Dmitry Sidorenko; Christian Bernd Rodehacke; Xiaoxu Shi; Paul Gierz; Lu Niu; Evan J Gowan; Sebastian Hinck; Xingxing Liu; Lennert B Stap; Gerrit Lohmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.