Literature DB >> 29696479

Natural Language Processing Accurately Calculates Adenoma and Sessile Serrated Polyp Detection Rates.

Jennifer Nayor1,2, Lawrence F Borges3,4, Sergey Goryachev5, Vivian S Gainer5, John R Saltzman3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: ADR is a widely used colonoscopy quality indicator. Calculation of ADR is labor-intensive and cumbersome using current electronic medical databases. Natural language processing (NLP) is a method used to extract meaning from unstructured or free text data. AIMS: (1) To develop and validate an accurate automated process for calculation of adenoma detection rate (ADR) and serrated polyp detection rate (SDR) on data stored in widely used electronic health record systems, specifically Epic electronic health record system, Provation® endoscopy reporting system, and Sunquest PowerPath pathology reporting system.
METHODS: Screening colonoscopies performed between June 2010 and August 2015 were identified using the Provation® reporting tool. An NLP pipeline was developed to identify adenomas and sessile serrated polyps (SSPs) on pathology reports corresponding to these colonoscopy reports. The pipeline was validated using a manual search. Precision, recall, and effectiveness of the natural language processing pipeline were calculated. ADR and SDR were then calculated.
RESULTS: We identified 8032 screening colonoscopies that were linked to 3821 pathology reports (47.6%). The NLP pipeline had an accuracy of 100% for adenomas and 100% for SSPs. Mean total ADR was 29.3% (range 14.7-53.3%); mean male ADR was 35.7% (range 19.7-62.9%); and mean female ADR was 24.9% (range 9.1-51.0%). Mean total SDR was 4.0% (0-9.6%).
CONCLUSIONS: We developed and validated an NLP pipeline that accurately and automatically calculates ADRs and SDRs using data stored in Epic, Provation® and Sunquest PowerPath. This NLP pipeline can be used to evaluate colonoscopy quality parameters at both individual and practice levels.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adenoma detection rate; Electronic health record; Natural language processing; Quality

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29696479     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-018-5078-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  10 in total

1.  Developing a natural language processing application for measuring the quality of colonoscopy procedures.

Authors:  Henk Harkema; Wendy W Chapman; Melissa Saul; Evan S Dellon; Robert E Schoen; Ateev Mehrotra
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  High colonoscopic prevalence of proximal colon serrated polyps in average-risk men and women.

Authors:  Charles J Kahi; Xiaochun Li; George J Eckert; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Quality indicators for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; Philip S Schoenfeld; Jonathan Cohen; Irving M Pike; Douglas G Adler; M Brian Fennerty; John G Lieb; Walter G Park; Maged K Rizk; Mandeep S Sawhney; Nicholas J Shaheen; Sachin Wani; David S Weinberg
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Multi-center colonoscopy quality measurement utilizing natural language processing.

Authors:  Timothy D Imler; Justin Morea; Charles Kahi; Eric A Sherer; Jon Cardwell; Cynthia S Johnson; Huiping Xu; Dennis Ahnen; Fadi Antaki; Christopher Ashley; Gyorgy Baffy; Ilseung Cho; Jason Dominitz; Jason Hou; Mark Korsten; Anil Nagar; Kittichai Promrat; Douglas Robertson; Sameer Saini; Amandeep Shergill; Walter Smalley; Thomas F Imperiale
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Applying a natural language processing tool to electronic health records to assess performance on colonoscopy quality measures.

Authors:  Ateev Mehrotra; Evan S Dellon; Robert E Schoen; Melissa Saul; Faraz Bishehsari; Carrie Farmer; Henk Harkema
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Natural language processing as an alternative to manual reporting of colonoscopy quality metrics.

Authors:  Gottumukkala S Raju; Phillip J Lum; Rebecca S Slack; Selvi Thirumurthi; Patrick M Lynch; Ethan Miller; Brian R Weston; Marta L Davila; Manoop S Bhutani; Mehnaz A Shafi; Robert S Bresalier; Alexander A Dekovich; Jeffrey H Lee; Sushovan Guha; Mala Pande; Boris Blechacz; Asif Rashid; Mark Routbort; Gladis Shuttlesworth; Lopa Mishra; John R Stroehlein; William A Ross
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Anatomic and advanced adenoma detection rates as quality metrics determined via natural language processing.

Authors:  Andrew J Gawron; William K Thompson; Rajesh N Keswani; Luke V Rasmussen; Abel N Kho
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Natural language processing accurately categorizes findings from colonoscopy and pathology reports.

Authors:  Timothy D Imler; Justin Morea; Charles Kahi; Thomas F Imperiale
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 11.382

9.  Impact of a quarterly report card on colonoscopy quality measures.

Authors:  Charles J Kahi; Darren Ballard; Anand S Shah; Raenita Mears; Cynthia S Johnson
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  Reliability of adenoma detection rate is based on procedural volume.

Authors:  Albert Do; Janice Weinberg; Aarti Kakkar; Brian C Jacobson
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 9.427

  10 in total
  7 in total

1.  TAX-Corpus: Taxonomy based Annotations for Colonoscopy Evaluation.

Authors:  Shorabuddin Syed; Adam Jackson Angel; Hafsa Bareen Syeda; Carole Franc Jennings; Joseph VanScoy; Mahanazuddin Syed; Melody Greer; Sudeepa Bhattacharyya; Shaymaa Al-Shukri; Meredith Zozus; Fred Prior; Benjamin Tharian
Journal:  Biomed Eng Syst Technol Int Jt Conf BIOSTEC Revis Sel Pap       Date:  2022-02

2.  The h-ANN Model: Comprehensive Colonoscopy Concept Compilation Using Combined Contextual Embeddings.

Authors:  Shorabuddin Syed; Adam Jackson Angel; Hafsa Bareen Syeda; Carole France Jennings; Joseph VanScoy; Mahanazuddin Syed; Melody Greer; Sudeepa Bhattacharyya; Meredith Zozus; Benjamin Tharian; Fred Prior
Journal:  Biomed Eng Syst Technol Int Jt Conf BIOSTEC Revis Sel Pap       Date:  2022-02

3.  Leveraging electronic medical record functionality to capture adenoma detection rate.

Authors:  Blake Jones; Frank I Scott; Jeannine Espinoza; Sydney Laborde; Micah Chambers; Sachin Wani; Steven Edmundowicz; Gregory Austin; Jonathan Pell; Swati G Patel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Development of a Large Colonoscopy-Based Longitudinal Cohort for Integrated Research of Colorectal Cancer: Partners Colonoscopy Cohort.

Authors:  Mathew Vithayathil; Scott Smith; Sergey Goryachev; Jennifer Nayor; Mingyang Song
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Validation of an automated adenoma detection rate calculating system for quality improvement of colonoscopy.

Authors:  Dae Kyung Sohn; Il Won Shin; Jeonghwa Yeon; Jin Yoo; Byung Chang Kim; Bun Kim; Chang Won Hong; Kyung Su Han
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 1.859

Review 6.  Assessment of Electronic Health Record for Cancer Research and Patient Care Through a Scoping Review of Cancer Natural Language Processing.

Authors:  Liwei Wang; Sunyang Fu; Andrew Wen; Xiaoyang Ruan; Huan He; Sijia Liu; Sungrim Moon; Michelle Mai; Irbaz B Riaz; Nan Wang; Ping Yang; Hua Xu; Jeremy L Warner; Hongfang Liu
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2022-07

Review 7.  The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Early Cancer Diagnosis.

Authors:  Benjamin Hunter; Sumeet Hindocha; Richard W Lee
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 6.639

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.