Literature DB >> 29696356

Successful endoscopic third ventriculostomy in children depends on age and etiology of hydrocephalus: outcome analysis in 51 pediatric patients.

Soner Duru1,2, Jose L Peiro3, Marc Oria3, Emrah Aydin3, Canan Subasi4, Cengiz Tuncer4, Harold L Rekate5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) has become the method of choice in the treatment of hydrocephalus. Age and etiology could determine success rates (SR) of ETV. The purpose of this study is to assess these factors in pediatric population.
METHODS: Retrospective study on 51 children with obstructive hydrocephalus that underwent ETV was performed. The patients were divided into three groups per their age at the time of the treatment: < 6, 6-24, and > 24 months of age. All ETV procedures were performed by the same neurosurgeon.
RESULTS: Overall SR of ETV was 80% (40/51) for all etiologies and ages. In patients < 6 months of age SR was 56.2% (9/16), while 6-24 months of age was 88.9% (16/18) and > 24 months was 94.1% (16/17) (p = 0.012). The highest SR was obtained on aqueductal stenosis. SR of posthemorrhagic, postinfectious, and spina bifida related hydrocephalus was 60% (3/5), 50% (1/2), and 14.3% (1/7), respectively. While SR rate at the first ETV attempt was 85.3%, it was 76.9% in patients with V-P shunt performed previously (p = 0.000).
CONCLUSIONS: Factors indicating a potential failure of ETV were young age and etiology such as spina bifida, other than isolated aqueductal stenosis. ETV is the method of choice even in patients with former shunting. Fast healing, distensible skulls, and lower pressure gradient in younger children, all can play a role in ETV failure. Based on our experience, ETV could be the first method of choice for hydrocephalus even in children younger than 6 months of age.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aqueductal stenosis; Infant; Neuroendoscopy; Outcome

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29696356     DOI: 10.1007/s00381-018-3811-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst        ISSN: 0256-7040            Impact factor:   1.475


  47 in total

Review 1.  Neuroendoscopy in the youngest age group.

Authors:  Shlomi Constantini; Spyros Sgouros; Abhaya Kulkarni
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 2.104

2.  Functional analysis of third ventriculostomy patency by quantification of CSF stroke volume by using cine phase-contrast MR imaging.

Authors:  Núria Bargalló; Lourdes Olondo; Ana I Garcia; Sebastian Capurro; Luis Caral; Jordi Rumia
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Evaluating the Children's Hospital of Alabama endoscopic third ventriculostomy experience using the Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy Success Score: an external validation study.

Authors:  Robert P Naftel; Gavin T Reed; Abhaya V Kulkarni; John C Wellons
Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.375

4.  Analysis of the success and failure of endoscopic third ventriculostomy in infants less than 1 year of age.

Authors:  A J R Balthasar; H Kort; E M J Cornips; E A M Beuls; J W Weber; J S H Vles
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2006-09-09       Impact factor: 1.475

5.  Failed endoscopic third ventriculostomy in children: management options.

Authors:  Aaron Mohanty; M K Vasudev; S Sampath; S Radhesh; V R Sastry Kolluri
Journal:  Pediatr Neurosurg       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.162

6.  Predicting who will benefit from endoscopic third ventriculostomy compared with shunt insertion in childhood hydrocephalus using the ETV Success Score.

Authors:  Abhaya V Kulkarni; James M Drake; John R W Kestle; Conor L Mallucci; Spyros Sgouros; Shlomi Constantini
Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  Repeat endoscopic third ventriculostomy: is it worth trying?

Authors:  V Siomin; H Weiner; J Wisoff; G Cinalli; A Pierre-Kahn; C Saint-Rose; R Abbott; H Elran; L Beni-Adani; G Ouaknine; S Constantini
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.475

8.  Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in children younger than 1 year of age.

Authors:  Rodrigo Panico Gorayeb; Sergio Cavalheiro; Samuel Tau Zymberg
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 9.  Selecting patients for endoscopic third ventriculostomy.

Authors:  Harold L Rekate
Journal:  Neurosurg Clin N Am       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.509

10.  Neuroendoscopic third ventriculostomy. A practical alternative to extracranial shunts in non-communicating hydrocephalus.

Authors:  R F Jones; B C Kwok; W A Stening; M Vonau
Journal:  Acta Neurochir Suppl       Date:  1994
View more
  3 in total

1.  Surgical intervention for hydrocephalus in infancy; etiology, age and treatment data in a Dutch cohort.

Authors:  J C Holwerda; E J van Lindert; D R Buis; E W Hoving
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 1.475

2.  Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in children: problems and surgical outcome: analysis of 34 cases.

Authors:  Md Moshiur Rahman; S I M Khairun Nabi Khan; Robert Ahmed Khan; Rokibul Islam; Mainul Haque Sarker
Journal:  Chin Neurosurg J       Date:  2021-01-06

3.  ETV in infancy and childhood below 2 years of age for treatment of hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Ahmed El Damaty; Sascha Marx; Gesa Cohrs; Marcus Vollmer; Ahmed Eltanahy; Ehab El Refaee; Joerg Baldauf; Steffen Fleck; Heidi Baechli; Ahmed Zohdi; Michael Synowitz; Andreas Unterberg; Henry W S Schroeder
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2020-03-28       Impact factor: 1.475

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.