Literature DB >> 22044376

Evaluating the Children's Hospital of Alabama endoscopic third ventriculostomy experience using the Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy Success Score: an external validation study.

Robert P Naftel1, Gavin T Reed, Abhaya V Kulkarni, John C Wellons.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) success is dependent on patient characteristics including age, origin of hydrocephalus, and history of shunt therapy. Using these factors, an Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy Success Score (ETVSS) model was constructed to predict success of therapy. This study reports a single-institution experience with ETV and explores the ETVSS model validity.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review identified 151 consecutive patients who underwent ETV at a pediatric hospital between August 1995 and December 2009. Of these 151, 136 patients had at least 6 months of clinical follow-up. Data concerning patient characteristics, operative characteristics, radiological findings, complications, and success of ETV were collected. The actual success rates were compared with those predicted by the ETVSS model.
RESULTS: The actual success rate of ETV at 6 months was 68.4% (93 of 136 patients), which compared well to the predicted ETVSS of 76.5% ± 12.5% (± SD). The C-statistic was 0.74 (95% CI 0.65-0.83), suggesting that the ability of the ETVSS to discriminate failures from successes was good. Secondary ETV was found to have a hazard ratio for failure of 4.2 (95% CI 2.4-7.2) compared with primary ETV (p < 0.001). The complication rate was 9.3% with no deaths. At the first radiological follow-up, the increased size of ventricles had a hazard ratio for failure of 3.0 (95% CI 1.5-6.0) compared with patients in whom ventricle size either remained stable or decreased (p = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: The ETVSS closely predicts the actual success of ETV, fitting the statistical model well. Shortcomings of the model were identified in overestimating success in patients with ETVSS ≤ 70, which may be attributable to the poor success of secondary ETVs in the authors' patient population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22044376     DOI: 10.3171/2011.8.PEDS1145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr        ISSN: 1933-0707            Impact factor:   2.375


  14 in total

1.  International Infant Hydrocephalus Study: initial results of a prospective, multicenter comparison of endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) and shunt for infant hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Abhaya V Kulkarni; Spyros Sgouros; Shlomi Constantini
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 1.475

2.  Prediction of endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) success with 3D-SPACE technique.

Authors:  Oktay Algin
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach to sellar lesions: a detailed account of our mononostril technique.

Authors:  Stefan Linsler; Michael Robert Gaab; Joachim Oertel
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2013-03-19

4.  Prediction of endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) success with preoperative third ventricle floor bowing (TVFB): a supplement to ETV success score.

Authors:  Qiguang Wang; Jian Cheng; Si Zhang; Qiang Li; Xuhui Hui; Yan Ju
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 3.042

5.  External validation of the ETV success score in 313 pediatric patients: a Brazilian single-center study.

Authors:  Leopoldo Mandic Ferreira Furtado; José Aloysio da Costa Val Filho; Eustaquio Claret Dos Santos Júnior
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 3.042

6.  Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy Success Score (ETVSS) predicting success in a series of 50 pediatric patients. Are the outcomes of our patients predictable?

Authors:  Laura González García; Bienvenido Ros López; Guillermo Ibáñez Botella; Miguel Domínguez Páez; Sandra Pérez da Rosa; Francisca Rius; Miguel Angel Arráez Sánchez
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2012-06-17       Impact factor: 1.475

7.  Endoscopic third ventriculocisternostomy in hydrocephalic children under 2 years of age: appropriate or not? A single-center retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  L Fani; T H R de Jong; R Dammers; M L C van Veelen
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 1.475

8.  The role of the Liliequist membrane in the third ventriculostomy.

Authors:  José Aloysio da Costa Val Filho; Sebastião Nataniel da Silva Gusmão; Leopoldo Mandic Ferreira Furtado; Guaracy de Macedo Machado Filho; Fernando Levi Alencar Maciel
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 3.042

9.  Endoscopic third ventriculostomy: can we predict success during surgery?

Authors:  L Romero; B Ros; G Ibáñez; F Ríus; L González; Ma Arráez
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 3.042

10.  An external validation of the ETVSS for both short-term and long-term predictive adequacy in 104 pediatric patients.

Authors:  G E Breimer; D A Sival; M G J Brusse-Keizer; E W Hoving
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2013-05-05       Impact factor: 1.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.