Rosario Mazzola1, Sergio Fersino2, Dario Aiello3, Fabiana Gregucci4, Umberto Tebano4, Stefanie Corradini5, Gioacchino Di Paola6, Massimo Cirillo7, Luca Tondulli8, Giacomo Ruffo9, Ruggero Ruggieri2, Filippo Alongi2,10. 1. Radiation Oncology, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar-Verona, Italy. rosariomazzola@hotmail.it. 2. Radiation Oncology, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar-Verona, Italy. 3. Radiation Oncology School, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy. 4. Radiation Oncology School, University of Padua, Padua, Italy. 5. Radiation Oncology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany. 6. University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy. 7. Medical Oncology, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar-Verona, Italy. 8. Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata (AOUI), Verona, Italy. 9. Surgical Oncology, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar-Verona, Italy. 10. University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) represents a new treatment option for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). An accurate treatment planning with risk-adapted dose prescription with adherence to specific dose constraints for organs at risk (OARs) and the use of daily cone beam CT (CBCT) for image guidance could allow an effective and safe treatment delivery. Here, feasibility and efficacy of SBRT in LAPC treated in our cancer care center are reported. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 33 unresectable LAPC patients underwent SBRT. In order to respect OAR dose constraints, a risk-adapted dose prescription strategy was adopted, choosing between the following schedules: 42 Gy or 45 Gy in 6 daily fractions with a biologically effective dose (BED) > 70 Gy10 or 36 Gy/6 fractions (estimating a BED 57.6 Gy10). SBRT was delivered with volumetric modulated arc technique (VMAT) and flattening filter-free (FFF) mode. Image guidance was performed by means of CBCT before every treatment session. The patients were evaluated at the end of treatment for acute toxicity and at 3, 6, and 12 months for late toxicity and treatment response. RESULTS: At the time of analysis, the median follow-up was 18 months (range 5-34 months). Prior to SBRT, 24 out of 33 patients received induction chemotherapy. Although all patients were previously judged as unresectable, 6 out of 33 (18%) underwent surgery after SBRT; all of them received a BED > 70 Gy10. One-year LC and OS were 81% and 75%, respectively. A total of 12 patients (37%) had an extra-pancreatic progression. No cases of ≥G3 acute or late toxicity were reported. CONCLUSION: In our experience, risk-adapted dose prescription and image-guided SBRT represents an effective treatment option for LAPC patients.
BACKGROUND: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) represents a new treatment option for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). An accurate treatment planning with risk-adapted dose prescription with adherence to specific dose constraints for organs at risk (OARs) and the use of daily cone beam CT (CBCT) for image guidance could allow an effective and safe treatment delivery. Here, feasibility and efficacy of SBRT in LAPC treated in our cancer care center are reported. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 33 unresectable LAPC patients underwent SBRT. In order to respect OAR dose constraints, a risk-adapted dose prescription strategy was adopted, choosing between the following schedules: 42 Gy or 45 Gy in 6 daily fractions with a biologically effective dose (BED) > 70 Gy10 or 36 Gy/6 fractions (estimating a BED 57.6 Gy10). SBRT was delivered with volumetric modulated arc technique (VMAT) and flattening filter-free (FFF) mode. Image guidance was performed by means of CBCT before every treatment session. The patients were evaluated at the end of treatment for acute toxicity and at 3, 6, and 12 months for late toxicity and treatment response. RESULTS: At the time of analysis, the median follow-up was 18 months (range 5-34 months). Prior to SBRT, 24 out of 33 patients received induction chemotherapy. Although all patients were previously judged as unresectable, 6 out of 33 (18%) underwent surgery after SBRT; all of them received a BED > 70 Gy10. One-year LC and OS were 81% and 75%, respectively. A total of 12 patients (37%) had an extra-pancreatic progression. No cases of ≥G3 acute or late toxicity were reported. CONCLUSION: In our experience, risk-adapted dose prescription and image-guided SBRT represents an effective treatment option for LAPC patients.
Authors: Kush Goyal; Douglas Einstein; Rafael A Ibarra; Min Yao; Charles Kunos; Rod Ellis; James Brindle; Deepjot Singh; Jeffrey Hardacre; Yuxia Zhang; Jeffrey Fabians; Gary Funkhouser; Mitchell Machtay; Juan R Sanabria Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2011-09-05 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Angelo Andriulli; Virginia Festa; Edoardo Botteri; Maria R Valvano; Maurizio Koch; Claudio Bassi; Patrick Maisonneuve; Pierluigi Di Sebastiano Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2011-10-20 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Giuseppe Ferrera; Gianluca Mortellaro; Mariella Mannino; Giovanni Caminiti; Antonio Spera; Vanessa Figlia; Giuseppina Iacoviello; Gioacchino Di Paola; Rosario Mazzola; Antonio Lo Casto; Filippo Alongi; Maria Pia Pappalardo; Roberto Lagalla Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2015-05-24 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: Albert C Koong; Erin Christofferson; Quynh-Thu Le; Karyn A Goodman; Anthony Ho; Timothy Kuo; James M Ford; George A Fisher; Ralph Greco; Jeffrey Norton; George P Yang Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2005-10-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Sonja Gillen; Tibor Schuster; Christian Meyer Zum Büschenfelde; Helmut Friess; Jörg Kleeff Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2010-04-20 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Lawrence H Schwartz; Saskia Litière; Elisabeth de Vries; Robert Ford; Stephen Gwyther; Sumithra Mandrekar; Lalitha Shankar; Jan Bogaerts; Alice Chen; Janet Dancey; Wendy Hayes; F Stephen Hodi; Otto S Hoekstra; Erich P Huang; Nancy Lin; Yan Liu; Patrick Therasse; Jedd D Wolchok; Lesley Seymour Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2016-05-14 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Joseph M Herman; Daniel T Chang; Karyn A Goodman; Avani S Dholakia; Siva P Raman; Amy Hacker-Prietz; Christine A Iacobuzio-Donahue; Mary E Griffith; Timothy M Pawlik; Jonathan S Pai; Eileen O'Reilly; George A Fisher; Aaron T Wild; Lauren M Rosati; Lei Zheng; Christopher L Wolfgang; Daniel A Laheru; Laurie A Columbo; Elizabeth A Sugar; Albert C Koong Journal: Cancer Date: 2014-12-23 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Stanley L Liauw; Lisa Ni; Tianming Wu; Fauzia Arif; Denise Cloutier; Mitchell C Posner; Mark Kozloff; Hedy L Kindler Journal: J Gastrointest Oncol Date: 2020-12
Authors: Jinhong Jung; Sang Min Yoon; Jin-Hong Park; Dong-Wan Seo; Sang Soo Lee; Myung-Hwan Kim; Sung Koo Lee; Do Hyun Park; Tae Jun Song; Baek-Yeol Ryoo; Heung-Moon Chang; Kyu-Pyo Kim; Changhoon Yoo; Jae Ho Jeong; Song Cheol Kim; Dae Wook Hwang; Jae Hoon Lee; Ki Byung Song; Yoon Young Jo; Jongmoo Park; Jong Hoon Kim Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-04-12 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Isacco Desideri; Giulio Francolini; Giulio Alberto Carta; Vanessa Di Cataldo; Laura Masi; Icro Meattini; Pierluigi Bonomo; Mauro Loi; Daniela Greto; Luca Visani; Monica Lo Russo; Roberta Grassi; Maria Ausilia Teriaca; Pietro Garlatti; Cosimo Nardi; Lorenzo Livi Journal: Technol Cancer Res Treat Date: 2019-01-01
Authors: U A Wittel; D Lubgan; M Ghadimi; O Belyaev; W Uhl; W O Bechstein; R Grützmann; W M Hohenberger; A Schmid; L Jacobasch; R S Croner; A Reinacher-Schick; U T Hopt; A Pirkl; H Oettle; R Fietkau; H Golcher Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2019-10-22 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Alba Fiorentino; Antonio Di Monaco; Alessia Surgo; Nicola Vitulano; Fabiana Gregucci; Elena Ludovico; Roberta Carbonara; Federico Quadrini; Giuseppe Rubini; Ilaria Bonaparte; Massimo Grimaldi Journal: Clin Case Rep Date: 2020-11-21
Authors: A Allam Mohamed; Andreas Thomsen; Marie Follo; Costantinos Zamboglou; Peter Bronsert; Hanan Mostafa; Aber Amen; Mohamed Mekawy; Anca L Grosu; Thomas B Brunner Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2020-07-23 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Tae Hyun Kim; Woo Jin Lee; Sang Myung Woo; Eun Sang Oh; Sang Hee Youn; Hye Young Jang; Sung-Sik Han; Sang-Jae Park; Yang-Gun Suh; Sung Ho Moon; Sang Soo Kim; Dae Yong Kim Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-12-10 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: R Fietkau; R Grützmann; U A Wittel; R S Croner; L Jacobasch; U P Neumann; A Reinacher-Schick; D Imhoff; S Boeck; L Keilholz; H Oettle; W M Hohenberger; H Golcher; W O Bechstein; W Uhl; A Pirkl; W Adler; S Semrau; S Rutzner; M Ghadimi; D Lubgan Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2020-09-10 Impact factor: 3.621