Ze-Tian Shen1, Han Zhou1, Ao-Mei Li1, Xiao-Qin Ji1, Chang-Chen Jiang1, Xi Yuan1, Bing Li1, Xi-Xu Zhu2, Gui-Chun Huang3. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210002, Jiangsu, China. 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210002, Jiangsu, China. simon_doctor@163.com. 3. Department of Medical Oncology, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210002, Jiangsu, China. huangguichun@nju.edu.cn.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes, toxicity, and prognostic factors of SBRT combined with gemcitabine plus capecitabine (GEM-CAP) in treating locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). METHODS: A total of 56 patients with LAPC treated with SBRT combined with GEM-CAP were reviewed from October 2010 to October 2016. The median total prescription dose at five fractions was 40 Gy (30-50 Gy). The patients were subjected to two cycles of GEM-CAP before SBRT. GEM-CAP chemotherapy was then offered for four cycles or until disease tolerance or progression. The primary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: The median OS and PFS from the date of diagnosis was 19 (95% CI 14.6-23.4) and 12 months (95% CI 8.34-15.66), respectively. The 1-year and 2-year survival rates were 82.1% and 35.7%, whereas the 1-year and 2-year PFS rates were 48.2% and 14.3%, respectively. The median carbohydrate antigen 19-9-determined PFS time was 11 months (95% CI 5.77-16.24). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that tumor diameter, lymph node metastasis, pre-treatment CA19-9 level, and post-treatment CA19-9 decline were independent prognostic factors (p < 0.05). Acute toxicity was minimal, with two cases (3.6%) experiencing grade 3 duodenal obstruction. No adverse events greater than grade 3 occurred. In late toxicity, three patients (5.4%) developed grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity and two (3.6%) suffered from perforation caused by grade 4 radiation enteritis and intestinal fistula. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of Cyberknife SBRT and GEM-CAP achieved excellent efficacy with acceptable toxicity for LAPC.
PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes, toxicity, and prognostic factors of SBRT combined with gemcitabine plus capecitabine (GEM-CAP) in treating locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). METHODS: A total of 56 patients with LAPC treated with SBRT combined with GEM-CAP were reviewed from October 2010 to October 2016. The median total prescription dose at five fractions was 40 Gy (30-50 Gy). The patients were subjected to two cycles of GEM-CAP before SBRT. GEM-CAP chemotherapy was then offered for four cycles or until disease tolerance or progression. The primary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: The median OS and PFS from the date of diagnosis was 19 (95% CI 14.6-23.4) and 12 months (95% CI 8.34-15.66), respectively. The 1-year and 2-year survival rates were 82.1% and 35.7%, whereas the 1-year and 2-year PFS rates were 48.2% and 14.3%, respectively. The median carbohydrate antigen 19-9-determined PFS time was 11 months (95% CI 5.77-16.24). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that tumor diameter, lymph node metastasis, pre-treatment CA19-9 level, and post-treatment CA19-9 decline were independent prognostic factors (p < 0.05). Acute toxicity was minimal, with two cases (3.6%) experiencing grade 3 duodenal obstruction. No adverse events greater than grade 3 occurred. In late toxicity, three patients (5.4%) developed grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity and two (3.6%) suffered from perforation caused by grade 4 radiation enteritis and intestinal fistula. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of Cyberknife SBRT and GEM-CAP achieved excellent efficacy with acceptable toxicity for LAPC.
Authors: Shalini Moningi; Avani S Dholakia; Siva P Raman; Amanda Blackford; John L Cameron; Dung T Le; Ana M C De Jesus-Acosta; Amy Hacker-Prietz; Lauren M Rosati; Ryan K Assadi; Shirl Dipasquale; Timothy M Pawlik; Lei Zheng; Matthew J Weiss; Daniel A Laheru; Christopher L Wolfgang; Joseph M Herman Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2015-01-07 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Jim Zhong; Kirtesh Patel; Jeffrey Switchenko; Richard J Cassidy; William A Hall; Theresa Gillespie; Pretesh R Patel; David Kooby; Jerome Landry Journal: Cancer Date: 2017-05-10 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: E A Eisenhauer; P Therasse; J Bogaerts; L H Schwartz; D Sargent; R Ford; J Dancey; S Arbuck; S Gwyther; M Mooney; L Rubinstein; L Shankar; L Dodd; R Kaplan; D Lacombe; J Verweij Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: David Cunningham; Ian Chau; Deborah D Stocken; Juan W Valle; David Smith; William Steward; Peter G Harper; Janet Dunn; Catrin Tudur-Smith; Julia West; Stephen Falk; Adrian Crellin; Fawzi Adab; Joyce Thompson; Pauline Leonard; Joe Ostrowski; Martin Eatock; Werner Scheithauer; Richard Herrmann; John P Neoptolemos Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-10-26 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: B Chauffert; F Mornex; F Bonnetain; P Rougier; C Mariette; O Bouché; J F Bosset; T Aparicio; L Mineur; A Azzedine; P Hammel; J Butel; N Stremsdoerfer; P Maingon; L Bedenne Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2008-05-07 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Michael D Chuong; Gregory M Springett; Jessica M Freilich; Catherine K Park; Jill M Weber; Eric A Mellon; Pamela J Hodul; Mokenge P Malafa; Kenneth L Meredith; Sarah E Hoffe; Ravi Shridhar Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2013-04-05 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Janet E Murphy; Jennifer Y Wo; David P Ryan; Jeffrey W Clark; Wenqing Jiang; Beow Y Yeap; Lorraine C Drapek; Leilana Ly; Christian V Baglini; Lawrence S Blaszkowsky; Cristina R Ferrone; Aparna R Parikh; Colin D Weekes; Ryan D Nipp; Eunice L Kwak; Jill N Allen; Ryan B Corcoran; David T Ting; Jason E Faris; Andrew X Zhu; Lipika Goyal; David L Berger; Motaz Qadan; Keith D Lillemoe; Nilesh Talele; Rakesh K Jain; Thomas F DeLaney; Dan G Duda; Yves Boucher; Carlos Fernández-Del Castillo; Theodore S Hong Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2019-07-01 Impact factor: 31.777