| Literature DB >> 29695705 |
Cecilia Galbete1, Mary Nicolaou2, Karlijn Meeks2, Kerstin Klipstein-Grobusch3,4, Ama de-Graft Aikins5, Juliet Addo6, Stephen K Amoah7, Liam Smeeth6, Ellis Owusu-Dabo8, Joachim Spranger9, Charles Agyemang2, Frank P Mockenhaupt7, Erik Beune2, Karien Stronks2, Matthias B Schulze10, Ina Danquah10,11.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29695705 PMCID: PMC5917045 DOI: 10.1038/s41387-018-0029-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutr Diabetes ISSN: 2044-4052 Impact factor: 5.097
Fig. 1Flow-chart of excluded RODAM study participants, because of missing or implausible data.
The exclusion of those participants with total energy intake >percentile 95 (4934 kcal per day) allowed to control for normality. The 1355 participants without information on the Ghana-FPQ comprise participants in who this was not conducted (n = 1262), and participants with the whole questionnaire or one or more whole sections blank (n = 93). FPQ Food Propensity Questionnaire, MI multiple imputation, PE physical examination
General characteristics of the RODAM study participants (n = 4213)
| All ( | Men ( | Women ( | Rural Ghana ( | Urban Ghana ( | Europe ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex (% male) | 38.0 | — | — | 38.7 | 28.8 | 43.3 |
| Age (years) | 46.2 ± 11.0 | 47.0 ± 11.3 | 45.8 ± 10.8 | 46.8 ± 12.7 | 45.3 ± 11.4 | 46.7 ± 9.6 |
| Education (%) | ||||||
| Never or elementary | 37.4 | 22.1 | 46.4 | 56.9 | 43.6 | 22.7 |
| Low | 37.5 | 41.4 | 35.1 | 31.9 | 39.0 | 39.1 |
| Intermediate | 16.5 | 22.5 | 12.9 | 7.6 | 12.7 | 23.9 |
| Higher vocational | 8.7 | 14.0 | 5.6 | 3.6 | 4.8 | 14.3 |
| Smoking (% current or former) | 9.4 | 19.7 | 3.2 | 7.9 | 6.9 | 12.0 |
| Total energy intake (kcal per day) | 2532 ± 838 | 2626 ± 862 | 2476 ± 818 | 2620 ± 842 | 2313 ± 668 | 2654 ± 916 |
| Physical activity (METs-h per week)* | 72 (14, 170) | 96 (28, 198) | 60 (10, 156) | 90 (36, 168) | 60 (6, 156) | 64 (14,188) |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 26.8 ± 5.5 | 24.9 ± 4.4 | 27.9 ± 5.7 | 22.6 ± 4.3 | 26.9 ± 5.3 | 28.8 ± 4.9 |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 89.7 ± 12.6 | 87.0 ± 12.2 | 91.3 ± 12.6 | 81.2 ± 10.8 | 89.3 ± 11.8 | 94.4 ± 11.6 |
| T2D‡ (%) | 9.4 | 11.1 | 8.4 | 4.9 | 9.5 | 11.7 |
Data are shown as mean ± standard deviation, unless otherwise stated
* Data are shown as median (percentile 25, percentile 75). ‡ T2D was defined according to the WHO diagnostic criteria (fasting plasma glucose ≥7.0 mmol/L, or current use of medication prescribed to treat diabetes, or self-reported diabetes). In this sub-sample of the RODAM study, 397 participants were diabetic. From them 338 participants presented fasting blood glucose values ≥7 mmol/L, 201 reported the use of tablets for diabetes and 259 self-reported to be diabetic
BMI body mass index, T2D type 2 diabetes, MET Metabolic Equivalent of Task, RODAM Research on Obesity and Diabetes among African Migrants, WHO World Health Organization
Fig. 2Site-specific dietary patterns derived by principal component analysis and rotated factor loadings.
Food groups and their rotated factors loadings are shown. EV, explained variance (%)
ORs and 95% CIs for type 2 diabetes through tertiles of the dietary patterns’ scores and per 1 SD of the dietary pattern scores (n = 4213)
| Tertile 1 | Tertile 2 | Tertile 3 | per 1 SD | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ref. | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | ||
| “Mixed” dietary pattern | ||||||||
| Diabetes/no diabetes | 115/1289 | 120/1285 | 162/1242 | |||||
| Model 1 | 1.00 | 0.89 | 0.64–1.22 | 0.77 | 0.49–1.21 | 0.279 | 0.86 | 0.73–1.03 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 | 0.93 | 0.67–1.29 | 0.92 | 0.57–1.48 | 0.815 | 0.95 | 0.78–1.15 |
| Model 3 | 1.00 | 0.93 | 0.67–1.29 | 1.00 | 0.62–1.61 | 0.874 | 1.02 | 0.83–1.24 |
| Screen-detecteddiabetes/no diabetes* | 46/1272 | 52/1266 | 40/1278 | |||||
| Model 3 | 1.00 | 1.14 | 0.72–1.82 | 0.87 | 0.41–1.85 | 0.617 | 0.80 | 0.56–1.13 |
| “Rice, pasta, meat and fish” pattern | ||||||||
| Diabetes/no diabetes | 176/1228 | 128/1277 | 93/1311 | |||||
| Model 1 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.61–1.00 | 0.65 | 0.49–0.86 | 0.003 | 0.80 | 0.71–0.91 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 | 0.81 | 0.63–1.05 | 0.74 | 0.55–1.01 | < 0.001 | 0.85 | 0.74–0.97 |
| Model 3 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.57–0.97 | 0.66 | 0.48–0.90 | 0.007 | 0.80 | 0.70–0.92 |
| Screen-detected diabetes/no diabetes* | 54/1264 | 48/1270 | 36/1282 | |||||
| Model 3 | 1.00 | 0.88 | 0.58–1.34 | 0.70 | 0.42–1.16 | 0.171 | 0.85 | 0.68–1.06 |
| “Roots, tubers, and plantain” pattern | ||||||||
| Diabetes/no diabetes | 155/1249 | 139/1266 | 103/1301 | |||||
| Model 1 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.74–1.24 | 0.82 | 0.61–1.10 | 0.180 | 0.93 | 0.81–1.06 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.77–1.30 | 0.94 | 0.69–1.29 | 0.715 | 1.02 | 0.88–1.18 |
| Model 3 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.77–1.31 | 0.98 | 0.71–1.35 | 0.900 | 1.04 | 0.90–1.21 |
| Screen-detected diabetes/no diabetes* | 59/1259 | 45/1273 | 34/1284 | |||||
| Model 3 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.43–1.02 | 0.52 | 0.31–0.88 | 0.016 | 0.88 | 0.69–1.12 |
Model 1: age, sex, study site (5 study sites)
Model 2: Model 1 plus education (never or elementary; low; intermediate; high vocational), total energy intake (kcal per day), smoking (never; former; current), physical activity (METs-h per week)
Model 3: Model 2 plus BMI (kg/m2), waist circumference (cm)
*The sensitivity analyses were performed by excluding those with self-reported diabetes at the time of the physical examination (final n = 3954) and the adjustment set is the same as in Model 3
OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, SD standard deviation
ORs and 95% CIs for type 2 diabetes across tertiles of the dietary patterns’ scores and per 1 SD of the dietary patterns' scores
| Tertile 1 | Tertile 2 | Tertile 3 | per 1 SD | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ref. | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | ||
| Europe ( | ||||||||
| Factor 1 | ||||||||
| Diabetes/no diabetes | 94/523 | 63/554 | 59/558 | |||||
| Model 1 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.49–0.98 | 0.71 | 0.49–1.01 | 0.055 | 0.88 | 0.76–1.03 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.50–1.02 | 0.79 | 0.54–1.16 | 0.204 | 0.94 | 0.79–1.11 |
| Model 3 | 1.00 | 0.62 | 0.43–0.90 | 0.70 | 0.47–1.03 | 0.058 | 0.89 | 0.75–1.06 |
| Factor 2 | ||||||||
| Diabetes/no diabetes | 69/548 | 82/535 | 65/552 | |||||
| Model 1 | 1.00 | 1.07 | 0.75–1.53 | 0.71 | 0.49–1.04 | 0.051 | 0.95 | 0.82–1.10 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 | 1.11 | 0.77–1.59 | 0.78 | 0.52–1.16 | 0.175 | 1.00 | 0.85–1.18 |
| Model 3 | 1.00 | 1.11 | 0.77–1.61 | 0.94 | 0.62–1.42 | 0.716 | 1.09 | 0.92–1.29 |
| Urban Ghana ( | ||||||||
| Factor 1 | ||||||||
| Diabetes/no diabetes | 72/401 | 36/438 | 27/446 | |||||
| Model 1 | 1.00 | 0.57 | 0.37–0.88 | 0.53 | 0.32–0.86 | 0.007 | 0.74 | 0.60–0.93 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 | 0.58 | 0.37–0.91 | 0.58 | 0.33–1.05 | 0.045 | 0.77 | 0.59–1.02 |
| Model 3 | 1.00 | 0.55 | 0.34–0.87 | 0.55 | 0.30–0.98 | 0.027 | 0.74 | 0.56–0.97 |
| Factor 2 | ||||||||
| Diabetes/no diabetes | 42/431 | 50/424 | 43/430 | |||||
| Model 1 | 1.00 | 1.11 | 0.71–1.72 | 0.99 | 0.63–1.57 | 0.941 | 0.98 | 0.82–1.18 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 | 1.12 | 0.71–1.79 | 1.14 | 0.67–1.94 | 0.644 | 1.07 | 0.85–1.34 |
| Model 3 | 1.00 | 1.13 | 0.71–1.81 | 1.17 | 0.68–2.01 | 0.575 | 1.08 | 0.87–1.36 |
| Rural Ghana ( | ||||||||
| Factor 1 | ||||||||
| Diabetes/no diabetes | 20/294 | 19/295 | 7/307 | |||||
| Model 1 | 1.00 | 1.18 | 0.61–2.31 | 0.47 | 0.19–1.15 | 0.103 | 0.81 | 0.57–1.15 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 | 1.39 | 0.70–2.78 | 0.70 | 0.27–1.80 | 0.533 | 0.98 | 0.67–1.45 |
| Model 3 | 1.00 | 1.60 | 0.79–3.26 | 0.69 | 0.26–1.83 | 0.557 | 0.99 | 0.67–1.48 |
| Factor 2 | ||||||||
| Diabetes/no diabetes | 24/290 | 10/304 | 12/302 | |||||
| Model 1 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 0.21–0.98 | 0.62 | 0.30–1.27 | 0.185 | 0.75 | 0.53–1.05 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 0.20–0.98 | 0.81 | 0.35–1.89 | 0.518 | 0.81 | 0.54–1.20 |
| Model 3 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 0.20–1.02 | 0.76 | 0.32–1.79 | 0.459 | 0.79 | 0.52–1.19 |
Model 1: age, sex
Model 2: Model 1 plus education (never or elementary; low; intermediate; high vocational), total energy intake (kcal/day), smoking (never; current; former), physical activity (METs-h per week);
Model 3: Model 2 plus BMI (kg/m2), waist circumference (cm)
OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, SD standard deviation