Literature DB >> 29694613

Is Zika virus outbreak a solved issue in Brazil?

Vivian Iida Avelino-Silva1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29694613      PMCID: PMC5968801          DOI: 10.1590/s1679-45082018ed4325

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Einstein (Sao Paulo)        ISSN: 1679-4508


× No keyword cloud information.
Zika vírus (ZIKV) was isolated for the first time in 1947 from a sample of a non-human primate identified at Zika forest in Uganda.( ) This is a ribonucleic acid (RNA) virus in the Flaviviridae family that also includes Dengue and Yellow Fever.( , ) Although the virus is primarily transmitted through the bite of mosquitoes from Aedes genus,( ) it has also been isolated from human body fluids, such as semen and saliva.( - ) Sexual transmission of the virus has been increasingly reported, including men to women, men to men, and women to men transmission cases.( - ) In addition, possible disease transmission through blood transfusion has also been reported.( - ) Human cases of Zika virus infection have been described since 1956,( ) but the disease has gained epidemiologic importance after an outbreak and epidemic dissemination of the virus in the Micronesia Islands( , - ) and in South and Central America countries.( , ) Although the first cases of Zika virus infection in Brazil were confirmed only in the first semester of 2015, recent publications suggest that the disease is probably among us since the beginning of 2014.( ) Brazil played an important scientific role and has been internationally recognized within the last two years for reporting the emergency situation of Zika virus outbreak, and also for the identification of neurologic outcomes in infants exposed to the infection during gestation.( ) The disease received striking visibility from the scientific community, emphasized by the increase in related publications within the last years. However, in the last months Zika virus infection seems to be no longer considered a relevant threat among healthcare providers and, more importantly, to the non-expert public. After the great media coverage of the disease in 2015 and 2016, in the year of 2017 little information was broadcasted about Zika – exception made to the substantial attention given to the fact that the incidence of Zika and others arboviruses such as Dengue and Chikungunya declined abruptly in Brazil.( , ) In 2015 the Brazilian Ministry of Health advised women to avoid becoming pregnant,( ) and in 2016 Zika virus was declared a Public Health Emergency of international concern by the World Health Organization( ) resulting in a reduction of birth rates in some regions.( ) In 2017, however, the number of consultations in fertilization clinics increased again (Glina and Alvarenga, personal communication), which may reflect a decrease in levels of concern of general population regarding Zika virus infection. Of note, this expressive reduction in the levels of concern about Zika virus infection in our setting can be premature, if not mistaken. Statistical modeling studies have been used to predict regions around the world that might be more affected by Zika virus. Such predicting models are important not only to guide preventive measures and help plan allocation of therapeutic resources, but are also important to guide where projects should concentrate efforts to clarify a number of unknown aspects of the disease. Modeling studies use information such as presence, efficiency and density of disease vectors, population density, temperature and local humidity, altitude, immunity or susceptibility of resident population, history of incidence of others arboviruses and population movements among geographic regions.( , ) Many regions in Brazil remain signposted as high risk areas for Zika occurrence,( ) including the state of São Paulo, where available surveillance data show that disease incidence was lower compared with the Northeast region of the country,( ) and a large proportion of the population remains susceptible to the infection. The arboviral transmission season in Brazil is just around the corner, and the risk for Zika virus infection must not be neglected, specially among women at reproductive age and pregnant women.
  27 in total

1.  Zika virus. II. Pathogenicity and physical properties.

Authors:  G W A DICK
Journal:  Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg       Date:  1952-09       Impact factor: 2.184

2.  Late sexual transmission of Zika virus related to persistence in the semen.

Authors:  Jean Marie Turmel; Pierre Abgueguen; Bruno Hubert; Yves Marie Vandamme; Marianne Maquart; Hélène Le Guillou-Guillemette; Isabelle Leparc-Goffart
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Zika virus: a new threat to the safety of the blood supply with worldwide impact and implications.

Authors:  Marion C Lanteri; Steven H Kleinman; Simone A Glynn; Didier Musso; W Keith Hoots; Brian S Custer; Ester C Sabino; Michael P Busch
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 3.157

4.  An autochthonous case of Zika due to possible sexual transmission, Florence, Italy, 2014.

Authors:  Giulietta Venturi; Lorenzo Zammarchi; Claudia Fortuna; Maria Elena Remoli; Eleonora Benedetti; Cristiano Fiorentini; Michele Trotta; Caterina Rizzo; Antonia Mantella; Giovanni Rezza; Alessandro Bartoloni
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2016

Review 5.  The alphaviruses: gene expression, replication, and evolution.

Authors:  J H Strauss; E G Strauss
Journal:  Microbiol Rev       Date:  1994-09

6.  Potential for Zika virus transmission through blood transfusion demonstrated during an outbreak in French Polynesia, November 2013 to February 2014.

Authors:  D Musso; T Nhan; E Robin; C Roche; D Bierlaire; K Zisou; A Shan Yan; V M Cao-Lormeau; J Broult
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2014-04-10

7.  Zika virus, French polynesia, South pacific, 2013.

Authors:  Van-Mai Cao-Lormeau; Claudine Roche; Anita Teissier; Emilie Robin; Anne-Laure Berry; Henri-Pierre Mallet; Amadou Alpha Sall; Didier Musso
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 6.883

8.  Mapping global environmental suitability for Zika virus.

Authors:  Jane P Messina; Moritz Ug Kraemer; Oliver J Brady; David M Pigott; Freya M Shearer; Daniel J Weiss; Nick Golding; Corrine W Ruktanonchai; Peter W Gething; Emily Cohn; John S Brownstein; Kamran Khan; Andrew J Tatem; Thomas Jaenisch; Christopher Jl Murray; Fatima Marinho; Thomas W Scott; Simon I Hay
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Cytokine kinetics of Zika virus-infected patients from acute to reconvalescent phase.

Authors:  Dennis Tappe; José Vicente Pérez-Girón; Lorenzo Zammarchi; Jürgen Rissland; Davis F Ferreira; Thomas Jaenisch; Sergio Gómez-Medina; Stephan Günther; Alessandro Bartoloni; César Muñoz-Fontela; Jonas Schmidt-Chanasit
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Zika Virus Outbreak in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Clinical Characterization, Epidemiological and Virological Aspects.

Authors:  Patrícia Brasil; Guilherme Amaral Calvet; André Machado Siqueira; Mayumi Wakimoto; Patrícia Carvalho de Sequeira; Aline Nobre; Marcel de Souza Borges Quintana; Marco Cesar Lima de Mendonça; Otilia Lupi; Rogerio Valls de Souza; Carolina Romero; Heruza Zogbi; Clarisse da Silveira Bressan; Simone Sampaio Alves; Ricardo Lourenço-de-Oliveira; Rita Maria Ribeiro Nogueira; Marilia Sá Carvalho; Ana Maria Bispo de Filippis; Thomas Jaenisch
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2016-04-12
View more
  1 in total

1.  Personal protective measures of pregnant women against Zika virus infection.

Authors:  Vladimir Antonio Dantas Melo; José Rodrigo Santos Silva; Roseli La Corte
Journal:  Rev Saude Publica       Date:  2019-09-02       Impact factor: 2.106

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.