K Blix1,2, O V Gran1,2, M T Severinsen3,4, S C Cannegieter5, H Jensvoll1,2, K Overvad6, J Hammerstrøm7, A Tjønneland8, I A Naess9, S K Braekkan1,2, F R Rosendaal1,5, S R Kristensen3,10, J-B Hansen1,2. 1. K. G. Jebsen Thrombosis Research and Expertise Center (TREC), Department of Clinical Medicine, UiT - the Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway. 2. Division of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway. 3. Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark. 4. Department of Hematology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark. 5. Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. 6. Department of Public Health, Section for Epidemiology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark. 7. Department of Hematology, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway. 8. Diet, Genes and Environment, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark. 9. Department of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway. 10. Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Abstract
Essentials Competing risk by death may lead to overestimation of venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk in cancers. We assessed the risk of VTE in cancer with and without accounting for competing risk by death. The risk of VTE was influenced by the mortality rate and the time since cancer diagnosis. Competing risk by death should be taken into account when exploring VTE risk in cancer. SUMMARY: Background Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common complication in cancer, and studies have suggested that aggressive cancers create the highest risk of VTE. However, competing risk by death may result in overestimation of VTE risk in patients with cancers associated with high mortality. Therefore, we estimated the risk of VTE by cancer site, accounting for the differential mortality between cancers. Methods The Scandinavian Thrombosis and Cancer cohort included 144 952 participants followed from 1993-1997 to 2008-2012. Incidence rates, cause-specific hazard ratios (HRs) and subdistribution HRs (SHRs) were assessed for overall cancer and by cancer site according to time intervals since cancer diagnosis. Results During follow-up, 14 272 subjects developed cancer, and 567 had cancer-related VTE. In cause-specific analyses, the VTE risk was highest in the first 6 months after cancer diagnosis (HR 17.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 15.1-20.3), and declined rapidly thereafter. However, when mortality was taken into account, the risk was similar in the periods 6 months before (SHR 4.8, 95% CI 3.6-6.4) and 6 months after (SHR 4.6, 95% CI 3.9-5.4) cancer diagnosis. The range of the 2-year cumulative VTE incidence rates was substantially narrowed for all cancer sites after competing risk by death was taken into account (from 1-10% to 1-4%). Conclusion VTE risk by cancer site was influenced by the mortality rate and the time since cancer diagnosis. Our findings suggest that the cancer itself is a major contributor to VTE risk, and that competing risk by death should be taken into account when VTE risk in cancer is explored.
Essentials Competing risk by death may lead to overestimation of venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk in cancers. We assessed the risk of VTE in cancer with and without accounting for competing risk by death. The risk of VTE was influenced by the mortality rate and the time since cancer diagnosis. Competing risk by death should be taken into account when exploring VTE risk in cancer. SUMMARY: Background Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common complication in cancer, and studies have suggested that aggressive cancers create the highest risk of VTE. However, competing risk by death may result in overestimation of VTE risk in patients with cancers associated with high mortality. Therefore, we estimated the risk of VTE by cancer site, accounting for the differential mortality between cancers. Methods The Scandinavian Thrombosis and Cancer cohort included 144 952 participants followed from 1993-1997 to 2008-2012. Incidence rates, cause-specific hazard ratios (HRs) and subdistribution HRs (SHRs) were assessed for overall cancer and by cancer site according to time intervals since cancer diagnosis. Results During follow-up, 14 272 subjects developed cancer, and 567 had cancer-related VTE. In cause-specific analyses, the VTE risk was highest in the first 6 months after cancer diagnosis (HR 17.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 15.1-20.3), and declined rapidly thereafter. However, when mortality was taken into account, the risk was similar in the periods 6 months before (SHR 4.8, 95% CI 3.6-6.4) and 6 months after (SHR 4.6, 95% CI 3.9-5.4) cancer diagnosis. The range of the 2-year cumulative VTE incidence rates was substantially narrowed for all cancer sites after competing risk by death was taken into account (from 1-10% to 1-4%). Conclusion VTE risk by cancer site was influenced by the mortality rate and the time since cancer diagnosis. Our findings suggest that the cancer itself is a major contributor to VTE risk, and that competing risk by death should be taken into account when VTE risk in cancer is explored.
Authors: Swaroopa Yerrabothala; Brett L Gourley; James C Ford; Syed Rakin Ahmed; Stephen J Guerin; Marc Porter; Heather A Wishart; Marc S Ernstoff; Camilo E Fadul; Deborah L Ornstein Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2021-10-15 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Frits I Mulder; Erzsébet Horváth-Puhó; Nick van Es; Lars Pedersen; Harry R Büller; Hans Erik Bøtker; Henrik T Sørensen Journal: JACC CardioOncol Date: 2021-04-20
Authors: Benedikte Paulsen; Olga V Gran; Marianne T Severinsen; Jens Hammerstrøm; Søren R Kristensen; Suzanne C Cannegieter; Hanne Skille; Anne Tjønneland; Frits R Rosendaal; Kim Overvad; Inger Anne Næss; John-Bjarne Hansen; Sigrid K Brækkan Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-09-21 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Trond Børvik; Line H Evensen; Vania M Morelli; Hasse Melbye; Sigrid K Brækkan; John-Bjarne Hansen Journal: Res Pract Thromb Haemost Date: 2020-01-09